- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/28/11 at 10:18 am to TigerPhan27
quote:
Without access to Bartman this 30 for 30 was pretty much worthless.
Agreed, but the recreation of game 6 and the stadium atmosphere was great stuff...really great stuff
Posted on 9/28/11 at 10:37 am to TigerPhan27
quote:
without access to Bartman this 30 for 30 was pretty much worthless.
they could have done a good "where is he now" thing instead of mythologizing bartman's lack of public appearances
they spent more time on buckner than where bartman was today
i DID like the other fans who were right there being interviewed. i thought it was stupid to have the a-hole guy 15 rows behind act like a cool bro for acting hard
Posted on 9/28/11 at 10:38 am to DelU249
It was worth the watch. I never for a second thought that Bartman would appear in an interview.
The detective work that they did, and the special effects to do the recreations were pretty impressive. I liked the thing about the seven second radio delay, and how Bartman didn't hear the play until it was over.
The a-hole sales rep who thought he was still a bad-arse for throwing a beer on Bartman needs his clock cleaned. What a pussy.
The detective work that they did, and the special effects to do the recreations were pretty impressive. I liked the thing about the seven second radio delay, and how Bartman didn't hear the play until it was over.
The a-hole sales rep who thought he was still a bad-arse for throwing a beer on Bartman needs his clock cleaned. What a pussy.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 10:41 am to DelU249
I love sports, I have season tickets in the North endzone. I never comment when regarding sports but love to hear the interactions among fans about topics I care about, I guess my 7 big posts are indicative of the above statement. This documentary made me think the only individual worth a shite was Bartman.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 10:42 am to Fewer Kilometers
quote:
The a-hole sales rep who thought he was still a bad-arse for throwing a beer on Bartman needs his clock cleaned. What a pussy.
agreed
Posted on 9/28/11 at 10:51 am to medtiger
quote:2003 broke my heart. 2008 just pissed me off. It was like, "Why even bother being so dominate in the season if ou are going to not compete in the playoffs?" Just suck so we don't bother getting our hopes up. Which they have done since then.
As bad as those 2 nights in October, 2003 were, I took 2008 much harder. As much as the World Series was in their hands, the Cubs were a Cinderella of sorts in 2003. In 2008, they were hands down the best team in the NL and choked it away again. I'm still not over that
This post was edited on 9/28/11 at 10:52 am
Posted on 9/28/11 at 10:51 am to SlowFlowPro
the radio delay aspect was interesting
the 180-page report written by the 2 attorneys was pretty weak
the 180-page report written by the 2 attorneys was pretty weak
Posted on 9/28/11 at 10:53 am to Rouge
quote:
the radio delay aspect was interesting
No, that was stupid, at least during the play. I seriously doubt that he was listening word for word while the ball was in the air.
Now a minute or two after it all happened, yeah it's interesting that he was listening to that.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 10:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The a-hole sales rep who thought he was still a bad-arse for throwing a beer on Bartman needs his clock cleaned. What a pussy.
I like the guy who reached for the ball and later pointed out Bartman. He said he didn't, but yeah it was obvious.
He also said that once he saw Alou's glove he knew not to touch the ball.
This post was edited on 9/28/11 at 10:56 am
Posted on 9/28/11 at 10:55 am to Rouge
quote:
the radio delay aspect was interesting
the 180-page report written by the 2 attorneys was pretty weak
yeah i wanted to slap those frickers
Posted on 9/28/11 at 10:56 am to PortCityTiger24
quote:
I like the guy who reached for the ball and later pointed out Bartman. He said he didn't, but yeah it was obvious.
He also said that once he saw Alou's glove he knew not to touch the ball.
yeah a big bunch of bullshite
that guy was on an episode of bar rescue this year and he kind of came off as a cock on the show, too
Posted on 9/28/11 at 10:58 am to SlowFlowPro
Alex Gonzalez made $30.2 MM during his career.
He could throw Bartman $500K for being the biggest sports scapegoat of a decade
He could throw Bartman $500K for being the biggest sports scapegoat of a decade
Posted on 9/28/11 at 11:00 am to Rouge
The thing that pissed me off the most about this document is the relief pitcher for Boston who basically laid all the blame on Buckner. You came in and threw the wild pitch that gave up the lead...idiot.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 11:01 am to PortCityTiger24
quote:EXACTLY
The thing that pissed me off the most about this document is the relief pitcher for Boston who basically laid all the blame on Buckner. You came in and threw the wild pitch that gave up the lead...idiot.
Stanley was considered a dope at that time too
it just seems like they could have done a shitload more with this piece
Posted on 9/28/11 at 11:05 am to Rouge
It was better watching it the 2nd time. I think most everybody was like I was when I first watched it a month ago, pretty let down. After watching it again and knowing that it's not really just about Bartman and more about how extremely ridiculous scapegoating is, I appreciated it more.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 11:06 am to PortCityTiger24
true, but i want to hear more from those that benefitted from the scapegoating as opposed to those that got screwed by it
Posted on 9/28/11 at 11:09 am to Rouge
I agree. I'm guessing none wanted anything to do with it.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 11:15 am to PortCityTiger24
i did learn where the term scapegoat came from. i guess that was worth 2 hours of my time
Posted on 9/28/11 at 11:15 am to PortCityTiger24
quote:
I like the guy who reached for the ball and later pointed out Bartman. He said he didn't, but yeah it was obvious
they were trying to eject him from the game, I don't blame him...I'm not getting canned from a saints game for something i didn't do.
i'm sure the guy is a cocksucker, but him pointing really added nothing to the end result...fox sports fricked bartman over, moises alou fricked him over, and so did that cock swab mark prior (makes me kind of glad that his career was ruined by injuries...justice)
Popular
Back to top


0






