- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NBA Semi's Predictions
Posted on 5/4/09 at 2:10 am to shel311
Posted on 5/4/09 at 2:10 am to shel311
this thread is about the playoffs. one poster said the east is garbage, which clearly after the first round, it is, and someone else used the dumbass regular season stats that are skewed by terrible teams at the bottom.
Posted on 5/4/09 at 2:35 am to shel311
quote:
And that point is still wrong, lol.
If you take the Kings record vs the East out, then you have to take out the Wizards record vs the West.
And when you do that, the East is STILL better head to head.
I said if you take GS to Sac in the West, not just Sac by themselves. Read the whole post before you respond next time
Posted on 5/4/09 at 2:58 am to TEXASTIGER22
quote:
I said if you take GS to Sac in the West, not just Sac by themselves. Read the whole post before you respond next time
And if you take out the 2 worst East teams, i bet head to head would be pretty similar.
And last I checked, those playoff teams in the West did get to play GS and SAC to help boost there records up.
Posted on 5/4/09 at 9:11 am to shel311
The ultra competitive west, right guys? I mean those first round games were sure thrillers:
Nuggets 4-1
Lakers 4-1
Rockets 4-2
Mavs 4-1
West is over-fricking-rated.
Nuggets 4-1
Lakers 4-1
Rockets 4-2
Mavs 4-1
West is over-fricking-rated.
Posted on 5/4/09 at 9:17 am to mattz1122
1 Cavs vs 4 Hawks - Cavs 4-2
2 C's vs 3 Magic - 4-2 Celtics
1 Lakers vs 5 Rockets - 4-2 Lakers
2 Nuggets vs 6 Mavs - 4-2 Nuggets
2 C's vs 3 Magic - 4-2 Celtics
1 Lakers vs 5 Rockets - 4-2 Lakers
2 Nuggets vs 6 Mavs - 4-2 Nuggets
Posted on 5/4/09 at 10:51 am to SprintFun
quote:
The ultra competitive west, right guys? I mean those first round games were sure thrillers:
pistons were the worst team in the playoffs. BOS is so overrated that they let a .500 team take them to 7. ORL was supposed to challenge the Cavs, but they drop 2 to the second worst playoff team in PHI. MIA is a one man show that ATL should have beaten in 5 at worst.
the only team you have a case with is NOLA. i dont think anyone with a brain would say that UTAH, SA, or POR couldnt take any of those EAST bottomdwellers
Posted on 5/4/09 at 10:52 am to SprintFun
quote:
West is over-fricking-rated.
Posted on 5/4/09 at 5:15 pm to 2010LSU
quote:
the only team you have a case with is NOLA. i dont think anyone with a brain would say that UTAH, SA, or POR couldnt take any of those EAST bottomdwellers
I think you're mistaken if you think it is a no brainer that Utah could take Chicago.
Sure, Utah had a better regular season record.
But look at how each team played in the final month. Chicago was playing MUCH better than Utah, who finished something like 7-11 over there last 18.
And the Bulls almost beat the Celtics, and i'm fairly certain the Jazz wouldn't have given the Celtics as many problems.
So, I think the Bull-Jazz would be a very close series, not even close to a no brainer.
Posted on 5/4/09 at 5:17 pm to AlexLSU
1 Cavs vs 4 Hawks - Cavs 4-1 Calfs
2 C's vs 3 Magic - 4-3 Boston
1 Lakers vs 5 Rockets - 4-3 Lakers
2 Nuggets vs 6 Mavs - 4-1 Nuggets
2 C's vs 3 Magic - 4-3 Boston
1 Lakers vs 5 Rockets - 4-3 Lakers
2 Nuggets vs 6 Mavs - 4-1 Nuggets
This post was edited on 5/4/09 at 5:19 pm
Back to top

0






