- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: More egregious decision by Seattle.....
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:46 pm to usc6158
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:46 pm to usc6158
quote:I'm looking at that article quickly from my phone, so maybe I'm missing the explanation.
usc6158
It doesn't make sense why under both assumptions the probablity of scoring on second down and losing the game is greater for running than passing. I mean the time left should be essentially the same; close enough that it's more reasonable to treat them as equal.
ETA: Nevermind I now see that both are 5% of their respective probability that they will score.
This post was edited on 2/2/15 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 2/2/15 at 2:02 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
Well Seattle scores a TD running the ball in that position 83% of the time, and NE gives up a rushing TD 81% of the time in that position.
This is exactly the matchup that Seattle wanted and they threw an inside slant. Unbelievable.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 2:19 pm to Chaz95
Nobody wants to admit it, but this is the real reason.
Popular
Back to top

0





