- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Merril Hodge would pick Big Ben over Brees/Rogers
Posted on 8/24/11 at 4:35 pm to Kracka
Posted on 8/24/11 at 4:35 pm to Kracka
quote:
brees was 32/39 for 288 and 2 TD
Rodgers completed 24 of 39 passes for 304 yards, three touchdowns and no interceptions. 8 less completions is no big deal.
they were both money. but the comparison isnt brees vs rodgers. its brees/rodgers vs ben.
why you put brees and rodgers stats against each other while leaving ben's out i dont know.
0
Posted on 8/24/11 at 4:37 pm to kevv824
quote:
1. Brady
2. Rogers
3. Brees
4. Manning
5. Rothlisberger
Rivers over Ben for sure.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 4:40 pm to bbap
quote:
Rivers over Ben for sure.
Disagree. Rivers is a good QB, BUT hasn't won shite in SD. Ben has two SBs under his belt and that puts him over Rivers EASY.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 4:42 pm to dukke v
superbowl rings is your argument? lol.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 4:46 pm to bbap
quote:
superbowl rings is your argument? lol.
Over Rivers... YES. I like Rivers, he has a attitude and brings it. I would still take Big Ben because he has been more sucssefl than Rivers when it counts.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 4:47 pm to dukke v
going 9 for 21 for 100something yards with 0 TDs and 2 picks is the stuff superbowl legends are made of. i cant argue with you there.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 4:51 pm to bbap
quote:
going 9 for 21 for 100something yards with 0 TDs and 2 picks is the stuff superbowl legends are made of. i cant argue with you there.
He helped win the game. Since you wanna be a PUNK. Give me his stats from the win over Zona. SMART arse.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 4:51 pm to dukke v
quote:
He helped win the game
clearly.
quote:you look them up if you want.
Give me his stats from the win over Zona.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 4:52 pm to bbap
Ben has gotten his team there three times while Rivers hasn't come close to the SB with the #1 O + D in the NFL
As Peej stated, Ben is perfect for what the Steelers do on O. He isn't in a system where he has the chance to put up Brees type numbers
As Peej stated, Ben is perfect for what the Steelers do on O. He isn't in a system where he has the chance to put up Brees type numbers
Posted on 8/24/11 at 4:52 pm to bbap
quote:Without question. He is just as firmly entrenched in the top 5 as any of the others. I think the top 5 QBs in the league are so clearly above everyone else that it's amazing that the line happens to be drawn at such a round number. I'll listen to any top 5 that has Brady, Brees, Manning, Rodgers, and Rivers in any order. But I won't listen to one that leaves any of those guys out. The only argument that can be made for anyone else would be for Vick, not Roethlisberger.
Rivers over Ben for sure.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 4:53 pm to bbap
quote:
Give me his stats from the win over Zona.
you look them up if you want.
FINE GTFO. BEN >>>>>>>>>>>Rivers.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 4:53 pm to bddwolfpack
quote:Ben's team has gotten him there three times. Again, this attributing of team success to the QB is the most annoying and lazy concept in all of sports analysis.
Ben has gotten his team there three times
Posted on 8/24/11 at 4:55 pm to dukke v
quote:
BEN >>>>>>>>>>>Rivers.
yeah in a world where stats lie.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 4:55 pm to Jamohn
quote:
The only argument that can be made for anyone else would be for Vick, not Roethlisberger.
Are you serious??? So I guess PITTSburgh would have made three SB'S with Vick???
Posted on 8/24/11 at 4:57 pm to bbap
quote:
yeah in a world where stats lie.
Ya see I am NOT a stat GUY I am into winning. And at least getting close. Rivers has ALL the stats, but has shite to show for it. And before you say Marino, He has the stats as well, but never had a running game.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 4:57 pm to dukke v
quote:With last year's version of Vick, yes. They would've won at least 3 Superbowls. But I won't argue this point with you as we have many times before. You have your opinion on it and I have mine.
So I guess PITTSburgh would have made three SB'S with Vick???
Posted on 8/24/11 at 4:58 pm to Jamohn
quote:
Ben's team has gotten him there three times. Again, this attributing of team success to the QB is the most annoying and lazy concept in all of sports analysis.
So I guess John Elway sucked????
Posted on 8/24/11 at 5:00 pm to Jamohn
quote:
With last year's version of Vick, yes. They would've won at least 3 Superbowls
I will disagree with this. ONLY because Pitts Offense is NOT designed for a QB like VICK.
BUT Your opinion is yours. I respect it.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 5:02 pm to dukke v
quote:
Ya see I am NOT a stat GUY I am into winning
winning is a team stat. really not hard to understand that, although for you i can see how it would be.
quote:which Rivers has.
And at least getting close
Posted on 8/24/11 at 5:09 pm to bbap
quote:
winning is a team stat.
Ok according to your logic, BEN >>>>> RIVERS.
Ya see that was simple.
quote:
although for you i can see how it would be.
quote:
One day I am gonna CUT you just for the principal of it. You are the MOST flaming and worst poster on here.
Page 4 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News