Started By
Message

re: In case you still think the Mavs aren't soft

Posted on 6/2/11 at 12:12 pm to
Posted by TheRoarRestoredInBR
Member since Dec 2004
31030 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 12:12 pm to
Chandler factor is overrated, he has been worked in quite a few games this offseason, and isn't called out for it due to Mavs winning their series and majority of games.

Portland had some success, Bynum ate him up, and Miami made easy entry passes for easy layups in Gm-1.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

You are acting like a moron on this issue.
Possibly, but I'm one of a select few who actually gets it when it comes to this.

There's no excuse for two starting 7-footers to average less than 10 rebounds a game. That's pussy ball.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

I never said he would be top 20 if he wins a title. I said he'd move up a few spots into top 25.


Fine. However, if he's worthy of being in your top 25 after winning a title, then he's worthy of being in your top 25 right now, as he's the same player right now as he will be in two weeks, just as all the other players are the same now as they will be in two weeks.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

You can say this 1,000 times and I still don't think he will get it. Just saying.


I'm going to say it until I'm blue in the face (which would be quite a feat, I must admit).
Posted by WHATDOINO
Member since Dec 2008
6903 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

quote:

MJ
Magic
Larry Bird
Wilt
Kareem
Russell
Shaq
Kobe
Duncan
Oscar




No Lebron James? Top ten? That's questionable insanity IMO.
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31210 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

2nd highest payroll in the nba. nobody worth a shite around him

What a fricking joke of an argument. The Mets and the Cubs have two of the highest payrolls in baseball.
Posted by Philosoraptor
Member since Oct 2010
4523 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

Fine. However, if he's worthy of being in your top 25 after winning a title, then he's worthy of being in your top 25 right now, as he's the same player right now as he will be in two weeks, just as all the other players are the same now as they will be in two weeks.


Fine. I guess he'll never be in my top 25.
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

There's no excuse for two starting 7-footers to average less than 10 rebounds a game. That's pussy ball.

So that's a reason not to cheer for them? They were in the middle of the pack in rebounding as a team during the regular season (14th). There are many "reasons" to cheer for or against any team. I don't think this one outweighs the rest of them.

For me, I'd rather not cheer for the team that is most likely going to win 3, 4, or 5 championships in the next half-decade. What's the fun in them winning in their first year together, with no real adversity? They're only going to get better. As a fan, I'd rather there still be some drama in the next few years as to who is going to win the title. Obviously, injuries can happen. But if they don't, who is going to beat this core on the Heat as they just get a better supporting cast around them?

Posted by Philosoraptor
Member since Oct 2010
4523 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 12:27 pm to
quote:


No Lebron James? Top ten? That's questionable insanity IMO.




It's tough to kick anyone out.

quote:

MJ
Magic
Larry Bird
Wilt
Kareem
Russell
Shaq
Kobe
Duncan
Oscar/LBJ
Posted by Philosoraptor
Member since Oct 2010
4523 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

What's the fun in them winning in their first year together, with no real adversity? They're only going to get better. As a fan, I'd rather there still be some drama in the next few years as to who is going to win the title.


They'll get a lot of competition next year. No way teams are just gonna let them get to the finals every year.

The knicks might make a big move for CP3. The Lakers can make a big move.

I'd really love for the Spurs to go after Dwight Howard... That'd be epic. frick the salary cap. But it won't happen.
Posted by bomber77
Member since Aug 2008
14783 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 12:30 pm to
I love peoples perception that every player from the past played good defense. Dirk is a below average defender but no much below and a top tier all time scorer. He averages 25 and 10 in the playoffs.

Numerous players that keep getting mentioned as better were actually poor defenders. Barkley, Malone, and Doc J just to mention a few off the top of my head.

Is Dirk Anthony Mason or Charles Oakley? No but just because the popular stance on this board is that white players are soft he gets an exaggerated tag imo.

He's never been hauled off the floor in a wheelchair for a shoulder injury. He has never had to switch shooting hands during the game because his elbow suddenly hurt so bad. He doesnt lay around on the floor for 15 minutes writhing in pain then come back in the game 3 minutes later.

Just sayin', I think its way overblown.

Not directed at you Soph, just the thread.

BTW, figuring if Dirk stays around another 5 years he will most likely be a top 5 all-time scorer. That puts him in anybodys all-time top 15.
This post was edited on 6/2/11 at 12:32 pm
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

They'll get a lot of competition next year. No way teams are just gonna let them get to the finals every year.

The Celtics' current group is pretty much done. All the Bulls can do is add a Rip Hamilton type. The Magic are going no where fast, and who knows about Dwight's future there.
quote:

The knicks might make a big move for CP3

I'd like to know how they can afford to pay him enough, or if they can even do it legally with the new CBA.
quote:

The Lakers can make a big move.

Well that wouldn't keep them from the Finals.
Posted by WHATDOINO
Member since Dec 2008
6903 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 12:33 pm to
I would start with Tim Duncan

He has ZERO business anywhere near top ten all time. You must be a huge Spur fan for that pick.

He is a great player, but not top ten all time.

I would also take out Oscar. Just my opinion
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Dirk is a below average defender

And he's actually gotten better this year, IMO. That could have a lot to do with Chandler's presence. Chandler is to Dallas what Garnett was to Boston in '08.

People act like Dirk is a liability on defense, but that's not the case at all. He's certainly not good, but he's not horrible either. I'd say he's just short of serviceable.
Posted by TheRoarRestoredInBR
Member since Dec 2004
31030 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Chandler is to Dallas what Garnett was to Boston in '08.


An impact? Yes. An Garnett impact? No, not in stats, maybe in clubhouse mentality/culture change.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Fine. I guess he'll never be in my top 25


No problems.

BTW, the "one dimensional" argument holds A LOT more weight than "he doesn't have a ring"...
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31210 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Fine. However, if he's worthy of being in your top 25 after winning a title, then he's worthy of being in your top 25 right now, as he's the same player right now as he will be in two weeks, just as all the other players are the same now as they will be in two weeks.

There is another way that Dirk can move up on his all-time list. Dirk can play at his current level for a few more years, and his sustained prime can be worthy of moving up the list.

I think the biggest problem with all of these arguments is that, collectively as a message board, we seem to be obsessed with individually ranking players in a team game. Of course, there are many different ways to interpret the worth of an individual. From some (whether it is intellectually lazy or not), championships and clutch matter. For others, it is simply the numbers and production, especially the metrics. The former is definitely advantageous on the surface, such as having Derrick Rose as the MVP, because it seems to be logical, especially for the casual fan. The latter definitely does a more thorough job at extracting the individual from the team to measure their value. They both have their merits and potential shortcomings.

My favorite point from this thread was Sophandros's statement that just because the majority of the people believe something, does not mean it is right (see the massive math thread for reference).

The rest of the Finals should be a fun one, and I hope the Mavs emerge victorious. Either way, I try to prevent my rooting interests from altering my opinions.
Posted by ocelot4ark
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2009
12536 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Dirk is such a terrible rebounder because he is one of only FOUR players in NBA history to average 25pts and 10 rebounds a game for his playoff career. If only he could rebound in important games...


Still waiting on an xiv response to this one. Did I miss it? 1 of 4 players EVER to accomplish such a feat. Four.

I have no idea why his rebounding has been down these playoffs. It's traditionally gone the other way. He's always, ALWAYS become a much more aggressive rebounder in the playoffs (see above). I seem to remember his rebounding being good against portland, okay against LA, and bad against OKC. He wasn't great in game 1, but he certainly wasn't the mavs problem on the boards. He had 8, which I think was tied for the lead?

I know the mavs played a TON of zone. If you know anything about basketball, you're extremely susceptible to offensive rebounds. There are open lanes to the basket that aren't normally there. Dallas played a lot of zone versus OKC, too. So, perhaps, that's why his rebounds are down.

Dallas isn't soft. They're just not a great rebounding team. That tends to happen when your best 7 footer is a perimeter oriented player. It's geography.
Posted by Philosoraptor
Member since Oct 2010
4523 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

BTW, the "one dimensional" argument holds A LOT more weight than "he doesn't have a ring"...


I never said he wasn't in my top 25 because he doesn't have a ring.

Here's what I said:

-Not in my top 25.
-Could be in the top 25 if he wins a ring or two.
-Or if he maintains the same level of productivity for a while.

The main reason he's not in my top 25 is his lack of defensive presence for being a 7 footer. If he tried a little harder and used his length to disrupt on the defensive end, then he'd def be in my top 25 and probably in the my top 20.

He should be able to rebound, defend, and block a lot better then he does at the moment.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

The main reason he's not in my top 25 is his lack of defensive presence for being a 7 footer. If he tried a little harder and used his length to disrupt on the defensive end, then he'd def be in my top 25 and probably in the my top 20.

He should be able to rebound, defend, and block a lot better then he does at the moment.


So if he doesn't change his game AT ALL, but his team wins the next two titles, you'd put him in the top 25?
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 18
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram