Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

How does the 2016 CFB National Championship Game rank among instant classics?

Posted on 6/16/16 at 8:55 pm
Posted by Toolman
Member since Jun 2016
27 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 8:55 pm
Id say its up there. I recently just rewatched it and I have to tell you, even knowing the outcome, it is quite an amazing game compared to a pathetic championship thats on now.
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167460 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

compared to a pathetic championship thats on now.





This series has been some good basketball except for game 1
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 8:58 pm to
2nd best championship game I've seen.(1.UT/USCW 3.Auburn/FSU)
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36707 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

2nd best championship game I've seen.(1.UT/USCW 3.Auburn/FSU)



:kige:
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 9:02 pm to
I was there and my team won so I'm a little biased but it was the GOAT
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35603 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 9:11 pm to
Not enough star power...

And Clemson.

And then clemsoning.

There are other close Nattys where both teams played A+ and had huge stars...going back to the 70's.

Nebraska-Miami, etc.
This post was edited on 6/16/16 at 9:12 pm
Posted by tigeroarz1
Winston-Salem, NC
Member since Oct 2013
3382 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 9:15 pm to
Still haven't watched the replay. The week after most fans and sports sites had it ranging from #5-#10. What a year though. It's so hard to win it all with conference championships, playoff then the National Title game.
This post was edited on 6/16/16 at 9:18 pm
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 9:19 pm to
The term "clemsoning" really needs t be retired. Baby boomers keep running it into the ground.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 9:19 pm to
That onside kick was one for the ages
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34502 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 9:22 pm to
It would have been better if either team had fielded a defense worth a shite.
Posted by Fus0623
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jan 2015
88854 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

mizzoubuckeyeiowa

I don't think you know the meaning of Clemsoning
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 9:24 pm to
quote:


It would have been better if either team had fielded a defense worth a shite.
No, that would have made it less competitive.
Posted by Toolman
Member since Jun 2016
27 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

It would have been better if either team had fielded a defense worth a shite.




lol Clemson would have blown LSU out.
Posted by tigeroarz1
Winston-Salem, NC
Member since Oct 2013
3382 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

And then clemsoning.

And I was there for that 62-9 thumping of Mizzou and then the 40-35 win over the Buckeyes.
This post was edited on 6/16/16 at 9:38 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram