Started By
Message

Clayton Kershaw vs Tony Romo

Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:23 pm
Posted by SECFan1995
Member since Sep 2015
7880 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:23 pm
Also a special dose of Matt Ryan!

This post was edited on 10/12/15 at 10:22 pm
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:26 pm to
Not his fault Kershaw can't win postseason games.







































Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145106 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:27 pm to
hopefully this winter. but that shite aint gone happen
Posted by SECFan1995
Member since Sep 2015
7880 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:30 pm to
I mean this team is rich and they can't win anything. Just crazy.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145106 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:31 pm to
eh. we are only in year four of the ownership in a sport thats real wish washy. if we go another four years without a WS championship then ill get pissed
Posted by BCMCubs
Colorado
Member since Nov 2011
22146 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:32 pm to
I was just wondering what will happen to Mattingly if they don't get out of the NLDS
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
11806 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:33 pm to
On Wednesday morning after Kershaw "chokes" again.
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
11806 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:34 pm to
Just like your boy Romo.
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:50 pm to
Kershaw 1 postseason win in 9 starts (12 appearances). 6 losses. 4,99 ERA

Romo is 2-4 by comparison. Only 2 of those games did he play a dud.

Romo > Kershaw in the playoffs. sorry bout it.

Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145106 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

Only 2 of those games did he play a dud.

same with kershaw baw. at least since he was 20
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:52 pm to
Romo > Kershaw in the playoffs
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145106 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:53 pm to
they seem pretty equal fwiw baw
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:54 pm to
sure, to the biased observer.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145106 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

biased observer.
Posted by SECFan1995
Member since Sep 2015
7880 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:57 pm to
We can settle it at both of you being biased observers.
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:57 pm to
No bias here.

Kershaw has an awful 5 ERA and his team is 3-9 in postseason games that he's appeared in.

He's kind of a choker. It is what it is.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145106 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

No bias here.

agreed. romo is 2-4. just as bad of a choker if you ask me
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 10:00 pm to
Winning percentage would suggest otherwise. And their position statistics compared to peers.

But hey, maybe Kershaw will pitch well next time out and the Dodgers will come back and win this series.

But probably not.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145106 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

Winning percentage would suggest otherwise
are we now going off how much better 2-4 is?
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 10:02 pm to
2-4 is better than whatever Kershaw's shite record is, yes.

More postseason wins too

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram