- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/17/11 at 1:44 pm to wish i was tebow
quote:
But trust me I will get a cut of the money he would get from me
i wish i would have had a better referral partner.stupid croaka made me lose it all teasing pitt and greenbay when i wanted to just go with green bay straight up
bye bye $55
Posted on 10/17/11 at 1:45 pm to Flatt2Flowers04
quote:
plus I believe they are coming off a bye week.
They're not. Played Iowa State last week.
Posted on 10/17/11 at 1:46 pm to CE Tiger
Never try to roll over with parlays and teasers!! 
Posted on 10/17/11 at 2:48 pm to wish i was tebow
Washington +21 vs Stanford
Arky -17 vs Ole Miss
WVU -14 vs Cuse
Arky -17 vs Ole Miss
WVU -14 vs Cuse
Posted on 10/17/11 at 2:56 pm to Brageous
I don't understand this love for UW. Stanford has been lighting people up this year.
Posted on 10/17/11 at 2:56 pm to Brageous
That WA line makes me want to bet. Stanford's defense isn't as good as the stats. The Farm is not a home field advantage. The only thing that conerns me is the knees of Price. He is one hit away from a major injury. Montana would not move the offense like Price.
Posted on 10/17/11 at 2:58 pm to okietiger
I think it's more of not thinking Stanfords defense can hold them to under 20-25...and they haven't played anybody decent...
This post was edited on 10/17/11 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 10/17/11 at 2:59 pm to bisonduck
Stanford looks terrible then rolls in the second half. Its happened all year
Posted on 10/17/11 at 3:01 pm to wish i was tebow
They haven't played anyone either. WA has the dline to force Stanford to throw. I am not impressed with Stanford's power run game like they've had the last two years.
Posted on 10/17/11 at 3:02 pm to bisonduck
quote:
WA has the dline to force Stanford to throw.
so you are saying letting Andrew Luck through the ball all game is a good thing?
This post was edited on 10/17/11 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 10/17/11 at 3:03 pm to bisonduck
quote:
WA has the dline to force Stanford to throw.
I'd rather stanford throw
Posted on 10/17/11 at 3:12 pm to wish i was tebow
I've been confused on this one as well, and some of the Washington supporters(or at least those that have taken/want to take them this week...I believe TTT was a fan of the opening line) have me staying away from this game. I haven't seen Washington play this year so I'm going off the advice from others on them, but Luck has been money for me every week= no play for me...for now 
Posted on 10/17/11 at 3:12 pm to wish i was tebow
I am saying that a balanced attack is better than one dimensional attack. Luck is good but he is even better when the defense has to stop the run. I am not impressed with their power run game. I think UW can force some 3rd and longs.
Posted on 10/17/11 at 3:13 pm to bisonduck
Probably wont bet this game but if i did i would go with the team that has covered every spread this year
I know your going to say weak opponents blah blah blah but ride the bull til you get knocked
Even if stanford doesnt cover they still have made you money this year
I know your going to say weak opponents blah blah blah but ride the bull til you get knocked
Even if stanford doesnt cover they still have made you money this year
This post was edited on 10/17/11 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 10/17/11 at 3:14 pm to bisonduck
I just feel like there are much safer plays than UW on the road vs an Andrew Luck-lead Stanford team.
Posted on 10/17/11 at 3:17 pm to okietiger
That is a huge spread. Stanford took a long time to put a lead on WSU, which couldn't move the ball to save their lives. UW will move the ball. Their defense will get some stops. 3 score spread is huge. However, I can see your reasoning.
Btw, Stanford's home field advantage is probably the worst in the PAC outside of maybe UCLA.
Btw, Stanford's home field advantage is probably the worst in the PAC outside of maybe UCLA.
This post was edited on 10/17/11 at 3:18 pm
Posted on 10/17/11 at 3:18 pm to bisonduck
quote:
I am saying that a balanced attack is better than one dimensional attack. Luck is good but he is even better when the defense has to stop the run. I am not impressed with their power run game. I think UW can force some 3rd and longs.
and this is why I love this thread every week. Someone that is from out West that I'm assuming gets to see both teams a helluva lot more than us here in the SE. Does Stanford really try to stay that balanced? I've only seen them once this year and they seemed to throw the ball quite a bit(can't blame them). Seems like that would be the strategy to go with, and then sprinkle in the power run game when UW goes to a Nickel or Dime coverage. quote:
I just feel like there are much safer plays than UW on the road vs an Andrew Luck-lead Stanford team.
Very much agree with this
This post was edited on 10/17/11 at 3:20 pm
Posted on 10/17/11 at 3:21 pm to DovaVol
Stanford is extremely balance. In fact, probably favors the run 2/3 of the time. Stanford is best when luck throws 20-25 times a game.
Posted on 10/17/11 at 3:23 pm to bisonduck
stanford is very balanced but I think Luck can get it done throwing 40 times a game
Like i said im staying away just my opinion
Like i said im staying away just my opinion
Page 9 of 50
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News