- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Brees vs Brady
Posted on 8/13/10 at 6:59 pm to WreckinRams05
Posted on 8/13/10 at 6:59 pm to WreckinRams05
Brady
0
Posted on 8/14/10 at 12:09 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:
Disagree. Manning may be the best EVER
But the question is who would you take right now.
Joe Montana may be the GOAT, but I'd take Brees over montana right NOW.
Posted on 8/14/10 at 12:19 am to bomber77
quote:
No, I just have an opinion. Right now Id take Aaron Rodgers over him. More upside at this time
So, 1 game this season, you're taking Rodgers over manning?
Jesus.
Posted on 8/14/10 at 12:25 am to Jcorye1
quote:
do you really think an average QB couldn't succeed with the fantastic WR's, TE's, and Offensive Line that the Saints have put together?
Those "fantastic WRs" that the Saints have that you speak of have made how many Pro Bowls compared to Manning and Brady??? STFU with that
Posted on 8/14/10 at 12:57 am to swagsurfin7
quote:
Those "fantastic WRs" that the Saints have that you speak of have made how many Pro Bowls compared to Manning and Brady??? STFU with that
Pro Bowls are for suckers. If you really rate people based off Pro Bowls, I don't care about your opinion
Posted on 8/14/10 at 1:03 am to Jcorye1
I dont... I instatly regret saying that bc Im the same way.
but idk how you think our skill players are fantastic. They are average at best.. There's only one or two of these guys that could go anywhere else and be the #1 guy
but idk how you think our skill players are fantastic. They are average at best.. There's only one or two of these guys that could go anywhere else and be the #1 guy
Posted on 8/14/10 at 1:05 am to swagsurfin7
I think Colston is fantastic, and Shockey when healthy is still a top 10 tight end. I'm not saying they're the best out there, but I think if Brees went down, they'd be able to go a couple of games above .500.
Posted on 8/14/10 at 1:06 am to swagsurfin7
quote:
There's only one or two of these guys that could go anywhere else and be the #1 guy
Colston
Shockey
Pierre Thomas
Bush
They could all start on other teams and be the #1 guy at there respective positions.
Posted on 8/14/10 at 1:41 am to shel311
Out of our receivers I think Colston is the only one that could be a true #1.. I wasn't talking about our RBs... I think Both PT and Reggie could be starters... I meant our WRs
Idk about a few games over .500, did u see Brunell in tht last game
Idk about a few games over .500, did u see Brunell in tht last game
Posted on 8/14/10 at 8:49 am to shel311
quote:
So, 1 game this season, you're taking Rodgers over manning?
1 game wtf does that even mean?
quote:
shel311
No Lebron thread for you to jump into right now?
Posted on 8/14/10 at 8:52 am to bomber77
quote:
No Lebron thread for you to jump into right now?
He probably thinks Don Nelson is better than Johnny U.
Posted on 8/14/10 at 11:04 am to swagsurfin7
quote:
Idk about a few games over .500, did u see Brunell in tht last game
I lol'd, but Brunell wasn't even close to being an average QB last year. The guy has a wet noodle for an arm, and his accuracy was dwindling. I don't know why the media always thinks older QB's suddenly become Chad Pennington in their sleep.
Posted on 8/14/10 at 11:10 am to Boh
Brady,until recently he never had the talent offensivly that Manning had....
Posted on 8/14/10 at 11:52 am to WreckinRams05
brees
Posted on 8/14/10 at 11:14 pm to bomber77
quote:
1 game wtf does that even mean?
Really? You don't know what that means? LOLZ
The poll read which QB would you take "right now"
Not which would you take for the foreseeable future.
So, you're basically saying if you had an entire roster filled out except your starting QB, you'd take Rodgers over Manning RIGHT NOW.
That doesn't say much for your football IQ bro. Not trying to be an arse, but it's makes you look silly to think that.
quote:
No Lebron thread for you to jump into right now?
Cause you never jump in Lebron threads.
Posted on 8/14/10 at 11:40 pm to Jcorye1
There's no way anyone should say, "I take this guy and it's not even close..."
Yes, it is fricking close.
Brees/Manning/Brady are the unholy triumverate at QB right now, with Aaron Rodgers being at the top of that next tier (IMO).
Firstly, I don't believe in clutch, so I think that notion is silly. Plus, placing the entirety of a win/loss upon one player (even if it is the QB).
Secondly, of the three, for the majority of their careers, Manning is the only one who had supreme WR talent to work with. Now, are Harrison and Wayne as good without Manning? That's the unanswerable question.
But it's obvious that the guys Brady/Brees have thrown to are less than spectacular (I'm talking Pre-Moss for Brady and I think it remains to be seen on Colston).
Yes, it is fricking close.
Brees/Manning/Brady are the unholy triumverate at QB right now, with Aaron Rodgers being at the top of that next tier (IMO).
Firstly, I don't believe in clutch, so I think that notion is silly. Plus, placing the entirety of a win/loss upon one player (even if it is the QB).
Secondly, of the three, for the majority of their careers, Manning is the only one who had supreme WR talent to work with. Now, are Harrison and Wayne as good without Manning? That's the unanswerable question.
But it's obvious that the guys Brady/Brees have thrown to are less than spectacular (I'm talking Pre-Moss for Brady and I think it remains to be seen on Colston).
Posted on 8/15/10 at 12:56 am to OBUDan
quote:
for the majority of their careers, Manning is the only one who had supreme WR talent to work with.
This... not to mention Dallas Clark
Posted on 8/15/10 at 1:10 am to swagsurfin7
quote:
This... not to mention Dallas Clark
Yeah. And that's partially how the organization is structured. They've been hell bent on surrounding Peyton with top offensive talent.
Pats more interested in getting defensive talent and making the other parts work on offense.
Saints kind of a blend.
Posted on 8/15/10 at 1:46 am to OBUDan
quote:
Pats more interested in getting defensive talent and making the other parts work on offense.
Yeah, like acquiring Randy Moss.
Posted on 8/15/10 at 1:51 am to BenDover
quote:
Yeah, like acquiring Randy Moss.
and Wes Welker...
The thing with the Saints is SP designed that offense specifically for Drew... he took the things he's most successful with and built around them. I dont think that the average backup could come in and take us to the playoffs. You saw Brady go down and the Pats go 11-5 without him.. which is why I think that hes out of the picture... Manning may be as equal as Brees right now as the best even though he's surrounded by the most talent
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News