Started By
Message

re: And the rich get richer

Posted on 1/14/16 at 8:42 pm to
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
18277 posts
Posted on 1/14/16 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

In the realm of collegiate athletics it's a pretty big deal


It made 0 difference in where I signed.
Posted by McCaigBro69
TigerDroppings Premium Member
Member since Oct 2014
45095 posts
Posted on 1/14/16 at 9:08 pm to
Lol Under Armour is garbage compared to Nike.

Until you start seeing black people wearing Steph Curry's shoes to the club, they always will be. Jordans look great casual or on the court, Under Armour's designers for everything are SO over the top that it's hideous.

The only people who wear Under Armour are 40+ year olds who are 80 pounds overweight and kids whose parents couldn't afford the $50 athletic shorts or the most recent $250 foamposites.

In addition, no Under Armour school has done a damn in college football, all eight teams in the CFP have been Nike sponsored Almost all Under Armour teams also have hideous jerseys.
This post was edited on 1/14/16 at 9:09 pm
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
120054 posts
Posted on 1/14/16 at 9:19 pm to
The amount of money athletic departments are making off of clothing and equipment endorsements is ridiculous.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram