- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official CryptoTalk Thread
Posted on 9/26/21 at 2:02 pm to CE Tiger
Posted on 9/26/21 at 2:02 pm to CE Tiger
LINK choosing ADA just as much as ADA choosing LINK.
Never made any sense for LINK to be ETH only - they want to be (and currently are) the dominant oracle in crypto.
ADA will have multiple oracle options. LINK, Ergo, Wolfram, Charli3, maybe some others I don't know of.
Never made any sense for LINK to be ETH only - they want to be (and currently are) the dominant oracle in crypto.
ADA will have multiple oracle options. LINK, Ergo, Wolfram, Charli3, maybe some others I don't know of.
2
Posted on 9/26/21 at 2:08 pm to RonLaFlamme
Would link be classified as a security?
Posted on 9/26/21 at 2:16 pm to 21JumpStreet
quote:
Would link be classified as a security?
I wouldn't think so. Govt is coming soon though - hope it's not too disruptive to the space.
Posted on 9/26/21 at 2:20 pm to RonLaFlamme
Hmmm if not, I may turn into a link bull
Posted on 9/26/21 at 3:03 pm to RonLaFlamme
quote:
I wouldn't think so
LINK is the epitome of a security under the classic definition, it was 30% premine for developers
with that said, only a handful of coins dont fit the definition of security, at least the way gensler describes it
Posted on 9/26/21 at 3:15 pm to rocket31
Damn, that's unfortunate, they could have been the king of oracles
Posted on 9/26/21 at 3:26 pm to 21JumpStreet
quote:Was there a pre-mine? If so, yes they will be effected.
Would link be classified as a security?
Posted on 9/26/21 at 8:52 pm to 21JumpStreet
It depends on what kind of regulation. I don't foresee the SEC going after the individual project/coin. I don't think they have the ability to do that. What they could do is force US based exchanges from offering those coins on their platform.
Posted on 9/26/21 at 8:58 pm to RonLaFlamme
quote:
LINK choosing ADA just as much as ADA choosing LINK.
Link doesn’t discriminate who decides to be its customer but Charles was a vocal little bitch about not using Chainlink on Cardano before inevitably bending the knee to the Oracle standard .
This post was edited on 9/26/21 at 8:59 pm
Posted on 9/26/21 at 9:41 pm to TigerTatorTots
LINK
quote:
Eddy @gauchoeddy
Ladies & Gentleman, I give you the cringiest pitch on why you should own Hex (Bonus: @stoolpresidente still doesn't understand #Bitcoin & still doesn't own any )
Posted on 9/26/21 at 10:45 pm to TigerTatorTots
Not what I pictured Boom looking like .
Posted on 9/26/21 at 11:29 pm to rocket31
if they destroy our sol and luna party i will be ready to revolt.
Posted on 9/26/21 at 11:39 pm to TigerTatorTots
quote:That was a really bad pitch. I can't lie.
Eddy @gauchoeddy
Ladies & Gentleman, I give you the cringiest pitch on why you should own Hex (Bonus: @stoolpresidente still doesn't understand #Bitcoin & still doesn't own any )
Posted on 9/27/21 at 7:23 am to 21JumpStreet
I don't think so, chainlink is not going anywhere. if anything I'm hoping these pre minted coins just pay a fine and register as securities and we move on? I'm not sure what the sec has in mind...
no one knows what the regulatory framework looks like moving fwd, unfortunately.
no one knows what the regulatory framework looks like moving fwd, unfortunately.
Posted on 9/27/21 at 8:17 am to TigerTatorTots
So pathetic
Posted on 9/27/21 at 8:20 am to TigerDeBaiter
"if you just hold onto it, it goes up"
Posted on 9/27/21 at 8:55 am to CE Tiger
quote:
Link doesn’t discriminate who decides to be its customer but Charles was a vocal little bitch about not using Chainlink on Cardano before inevitably bending the knee to the Oracle standard .
Not accurate. In the beginning, Charles was vocal and very positive about integrating with Chainlink. He did say that the community (not the project) was very tribal and toxic and he didn't understand why they would be against integrating another L1 blockchain. He also thought the leadership of Chainlink should've been more vocal about the value proposition, but he said he would do what was in the best interest of the project.
Posted on 9/27/21 at 8:58 am to rocket31
quote:
it was 30% premine for developers
I was going to go into more detail about that, but was in a bit of a hurry. That would be the part of the project that would risk being defined as a security. I know there are a handful of criteria that are used (some of it subjective) to meet the security definition.
Posted on 9/27/21 at 8:59 am to RonLaFlamme
yea ive only seen Charles talk positive about Chainlink, but he was critical of the frog trolls on twitter...which is understandable
Page 1759 of 2209
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News