- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official CryptoTalk Thread
Posted on 2/13/21 at 10:38 am to ChuckO1975
Posted on 2/13/21 at 10:38 am to ChuckO1975
I can tell you've been following the project at least since 2017.
No doubt that the departure of CFB and Sonstebo were a good thing for the project to move forward. I'll say that a lot of what we see now with Ethereum scalability was accurately predicted by those two back in 2017. It never made sense to me that so many projects were being built on the back of ETH considering the fees/friction of using the network along with no proven path to scalability.
The tangle is really a very simple, elegant solution to the major problems of traditional blockchain architecture. The Iota foundation has put a lot of work into validating the stability of the tangle at scale. They've built inroads into universities and industry to foster further adoption of the protocol. They are working with OMG on standardizing the protocol.
This project is still under the radar. The potential is enormous. So is the risk.
IMO...from a risk/reward perspective, right now is a great time to load up on IOTA. Everyone must DYOR though.
No doubt that the departure of CFB and Sonstebo were a good thing for the project to move forward. I'll say that a lot of what we see now with Ethereum scalability was accurately predicted by those two back in 2017. It never made sense to me that so many projects were being built on the back of ETH considering the fees/friction of using the network along with no proven path to scalability.
The tangle is really a very simple, elegant solution to the major problems of traditional blockchain architecture. The Iota foundation has put a lot of work into validating the stability of the tangle at scale. They've built inroads into universities and industry to foster further adoption of the protocol. They are working with OMG on standardizing the protocol.
This project is still under the radar. The potential is enormous. So is the risk.
IMO...from a risk/reward perspective, right now is a great time to load up on IOTA. Everyone must DYOR though.
Posted on 2/13/21 at 10:54 am to rocket31
quote:
yea, the next hot thing imo will be NFTs and whoever in the defi space markets that most effectively will be in a good position moving forward.
Check out Secret Network (SCRT). Encrypted mempools, encrypted token contracts. Programmable privacy on transactions. Front runner resistant, and far more scalable that ETH.
A major failing of most every project right now is either building on open ledgers or building coins with open ledgers. If I can't have at least as much privacy as I can with a normal bank, I'm not doing anything meaningful on that chain, and there is no escaping that need.
Posted on 2/13/21 at 10:58 am to Douglas Quaid
quote:
No doubt that the departure of CFB and Sonstebo were a good thing for the project to move forward. I'll say that a lot of what we see now with Ethereum scalability was accurately predicted by those two back in 2017. It never made sense to me that so many projects were being built on the back of ETH considering the fees/friction of using the network along with no proven path to scalability.
As wild as CfB, Dom, and David were, they were actually lot more serious about their project than Ethereum ever was. The hype around Vitalik Buterin was totally unearned, and his ideas were barely even novel. He had the advantage of having built credibility in the Bitcoin community though, and had a lot of community support when he decided to sell his ETH (literally) idea. Eth had MONEY, so they were able to hire up a lot of developers in the "ecosystem", and once the pumps started coming hard and fast, the money attracted a lot more projects and a lot more developers. It constructed a house of cards that they are now trying to reinforce, but it's a losing battle.
Vitalik belongs in the same bin and Andreas Antonopoulas. I guess that probably means different things to different people, but it's not complimentary from me.
IOTA founders fought almost the entire blockchain industry for years, and without much grace haha. In the end, I'm glad Dave and CfB were there to found it, I think they were needed. I hope IOTA wipes ETH off the map in the next 5 years. I think they will.
This post was edited on 2/13/21 at 11:01 am
Posted on 2/13/21 at 11:01 am to ChuckO1975
Very well said. Couldn't agree more.

Posted on 2/13/21 at 11:26 am to ChuckO1975
quote:
If I can't have at least as much privacy as I can with a normal bank, I'm not doing anything meaningful on that chain, and there is no escaping that need.
Look up Chainlink’s acquisition of Deco and how this will play into those concerns.
LINK
quote:
With the acquisition of DECO, Nazarov believes he has found a solution to this. Rather than deploying new technology, adopters can use the same technology that is already in use today to secure web traffic. This is security technology that has existed for 25 years – the same security which has kept us safe when we have used our bank cards to purchase goods on the internet — Secure Sockets Layer, or SSL. This technology uses the same encryption that smart contracts and secure oracles rely on. Not only does that remove a large hurdle for adopters, but it also opens up some interesting possibilities; for example, it becomes possible to mathematically prove exactly when (or to use the technical terms — within which TLS session) a given piece of data was transmitted. As data moves along a long supply chain of intermediaries and smart contracts, there is the risk that it can be tampered with, but being able to prove mathematically not just from whom the information was transmitted from but exactly when it was transmitted becomes very powerful as it removes the risk that data was altered, after the fact.
Posted on 2/13/21 at 11:44 am to rocket31
What are some of the big ETH competitors.
Posted on 2/13/21 at 11:46 am to Old Money
The only ones viable I think are ADA and Dot. Maybe Vechain for strictly supply chain purposes. Radix DLT intrigued me enough to throw some money at it when it formed an alliance with Link and Aave .
Posted on 2/13/21 at 11:49 am to Old Money
Read the posts just above you. 
Posted on 2/13/21 at 11:50 am to Old Money
tezos
polkadot
cardano
solana
bsc/bnb (binance)
algo
im not even sure if ETH 2.0 could settle all future transactions anyways, if it did scale successfully
full disclosure, i currently do not own any of these coins, but id pick binance if someone asked me for the one most likely project to disrupt eth, (BNB is up 200% in the last 14 days)
polkadot
cardano
solana
bsc/bnb (binance)
algo
im not even sure if ETH 2.0 could settle all future transactions anyways, if it did scale successfully
full disclosure, i currently do not own any of these coins, but id pick binance if someone asked me for the one most likely project to disrupt eth, (BNB is up 200% in the last 14 days)
This post was edited on 2/13/21 at 11:57 am
Posted on 2/13/21 at 12:21 pm to CE Tiger
quote:
Look up Chainlink’s acquisition of Deco and how this will play into those concerns.
This is an interesting development, but I don't think it's exactly the same thing I am referring to. An oracle system needs to have a way to authenticate the source of data inputs in to the network to protect the quality of data. It seems like this article is mostly focused on Authenticating data sources, rather than protecting transaction privacy.
most crypto chains or tangles have an open ledger that can be scanned and analyzed to learn information about who/what is conducting value or data transactions on the network. This is the single biggest weakness of the blockchain model, because it exposes every person or machine that uses the ledger to the public. It's the most public transaction model ever devised.
Transaction privacy is about obscuring "Who" sent or received "What". This little line in the article:
quote:
Another aspect concerns the challenge of privacy. There’s little need for privacy in DeFi (save for the actual identities of token holders, which blockchain already obfuscates).
tips off readers about the lack of understanding by the author. Blockchain obfuscates NOTHING about token/coin holder identities. It broadcasts literally everything it knows about every human or machine that uses it. It's not hard at all to analyze a chain and link user identities to wallets and transactions. There are some exceptions to this: Monero and Zcash (using ring signatures and zero knowledge proofs respectively) are the two most well-known projects that have achieved some success at making the system more private. On top of that there IS a BIG reason to obscure DeFi data, because trading bots use the publicly available data in the mempool (proposed transactions pool) to arbitrage trades by manipulating the gas prices of their own transaction. This robs human users of a platform on which to make fair trades. It's a value-stealing mechanism that hurts the smallest traders and rewards malicious actors.
Secret Network has a much more streamlined solution to this problem than the one described in the article, though I have to say the article almost assuredly explains this very poorly, so I would have to read more about what LINK is actually proposing.
Secret network uses a system of low-cost, relatively easy to operate nodes with hardware that encrypts blockchain data inputs in a Trusted Execution Environment (think of it like a sandbox that's relatively safe from malicious software code), making the details of a transaction (inputs) unreadable to outside observers, but the owners of the inputs can choose to make them visible on their own terms. This allows transparency by choice, not by default. Privacy is the default. All an outsider will see is that a user has created a "contract". This system is already in place, and being used right now, though it's primarily focused on protecting DeFi customers by preventing "front running" (malicious bot activity on DeFi networks).
Anyhoo, thanks for pointing this out to me, I will read more into it!
This post was edited on 2/13/21 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 2/13/21 at 12:29 pm to Old Money
quote:
What are some of the big ETH competitors.
If by "big" you mean big market caps, then ADA, DOT, EOS, and few others.
If by "big" you mean conceptually large enough to tackle the task that ETH set out to tackle then there are a few more.
Sleeper: Nexus Earth
Mid Tier: IOTA
Most well-known: ADA, DOT, EOS Anything Binance is involved with.
Lots more than these, this is just a "top of the head" list. I recommend really digging deep online, and getting involved on Telegram Messenger groups.
I'm personally most interested in Nexus Earth (NXS) and IOTA. They have taken different approaches to the same issues, but both have the goal of being a true "2.0". A new "internet" if you will.
Nexus Earth (NXS) is a very small project relative to many of the others. It started like Bitcoin, no pre-mine, no ICO, no funded foundation to guide development, but conceptually it is very strong, and the developers have consistently put out really good products. The founder is Colin Cantrell, son of Jim Cantrell who helped Musk found Space-X. There is no tie between Space-X and NXS other than that AFAIK, but Colin has demonstrated really good judgement and a grounded vision for something with such a daunting task ahead of it. NXS is dirt cheap right now, if you are in the speculation game.
IOTA has been written about many times, so I won't go into that.
This post was edited on 2/13/21 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 2/13/21 at 2:09 pm to HurricaneDunc
Can y’all explain this “alt-coin season” and how long it typically lasts?
Posted on 2/13/21 at 2:44 pm to finchmeister08
Mostly a scheme by crypto media, marketers and personalities to pump the new money into alt coins after BTC and ETH pump. It lasts as long as new money keeps coming in
Posted on 2/13/21 at 2:46 pm to finchmeister08
Has there been any talk about xvg or neo in a while? I've got a bunch that I forgot about until recently.
Posted on 2/13/21 at 3:27 pm to Nate Bracey
I sold out of neo, not that it can't gain but its a long list of Altcoins that are no longer in fashion. Would prefer hotter defi projects with more growth potential
Posted on 2/13/21 at 3:51 pm to SUG
I don’t know what to do with my hands...
Posted on 2/13/21 at 4:30 pm to CE Tiger
But what do I know.. Neo might take over the world lol.
I realized my portfolio was too 2017 for alt coins. I now focus on main ones Eth Ada Dot. Newer mid caps such as 0x GRT
And low cap Dot startups. Keep eye out for polka markets in a few weeks
I realized my portfolio was too 2017 for alt coins. I now focus on main ones Eth Ada Dot. Newer mid caps such as 0x GRT
And low cap Dot startups. Keep eye out for polka markets in a few weeks
Posted on 2/13/21 at 5:12 pm to finchmeister08
quote:
Can y’all explain this “alt-coin season”
I think another poster explained it pretty well, but I'll give it a go:
Alt Coin Season is when big players sucker in the squares by pumping the living shite out of projects. Squares see big line go up, and trickle a little money in, then they see big line go up again, and sink their whole paycheck i. Then they see big line go up again, and sink their savings in, liquidate their stock portfolio, and eat ramen for a few weeks so they can get that Bitcoin at "a price we will never see again!".
Alt Season ends right after that, with the squares convinced that if they hold, they will become bitcoin billionaires, because the big line always goes up, and the tech is like, amazing bro!
They then forget they ever invested in crypto, and completely miss when Bitcoin drops down below the price it was when they first heard about it, 20% of the ATH, leaving only the sharps to buy up the supply at that level.
It's amazing.
Bottom Line is this: Spend more time reading about projects that were around before the alt season and survived and thrived in the bear market. When Alt Coin season ends, and it will. You should go right back into Binance and buy the living crap out of the ones you like.
This post was edited on 2/13/21 at 5:18 pm
Popular
Back to top



1





