Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

JEPI , the warts

Posted on 3/2/23 at 7:10 am
Posted by DTRooster
Belle River, La
Member since Dec 2013
8890 posts
Posted on 3/2/23 at 7:10 am
can you find some? Other than the normal market risk I don’t see any and with a +10% dividend history it looks pretty solid
Posted by PelsForLife
Member since May 2019
474 posts
Posted on 3/2/23 at 11:36 am to
JEPQ might be a better long term hold. Similar dividend yield, but much better holdings with the tech stocks.
Posted by FLObserver
Jacksonville
Member since Nov 2005
15848 posts
Posted on 3/2/23 at 1:02 pm to
Why not own both? I think must people do own both including myself.
Posted by PelsForLife
Member since May 2019
474 posts
Posted on 3/2/23 at 1:29 pm to
You should own both for more diversity, but if you only owned one that's what I'd go with.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135710 posts
Posted on 3/2/23 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

JEPQ might be a better long term hold.
I own JEPI... more S&P based.
JEPQ... NASDAQ based.
Simplistic reason, NASDAQ can underperform in rising rate environments.

Long term though, either should be good. Techs may well outstrip the S&P.
Posted by stewie
Member since Jan 2006
4024 posts
Posted on 3/2/23 at 2:47 pm to
Only knock, it’s an ordinary dividend.

Can be a bit more expensive in a taxable account.
Posted by DTRooster
Belle River, La
Member since Dec 2013
8890 posts
Posted on 3/4/23 at 8:56 am to
Shouldn’t be an issue thru a Roth. Correct?
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
24812 posts
Posted on 3/4/23 at 7:45 pm to
Yes. Ordinary is not the best, but that is not a reason to not buy in a NQ account.
Posted by stewie
Member since Jan 2006
4024 posts
Posted on 3/4/23 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

Shouldn’t be an issue thru a Roth. Correct?


I believe so, it shouldn’t be an issue in a Roth.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91362 posts
Posted on 3/5/23 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

can you find some? Other than the normal market risk I don’t see any and with a +10% dividend history it looks pretty solid


It’s not normal market risk though. It’s more muted risk, particularly to the upside, in exchange for more income.

If you’re willing to own market like risk, buying the actual market will outperform.
This post was edited on 3/6/23 at 6:21 am
Posted by DTRooster
Belle River, La
Member since Dec 2013
8890 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 2:39 pm to
Not really. It’s tracked the SPY percentage wise pretty close and has also payed 10+% yearly on the divvy side which offsets the losses side. Much more of a consistent play for the risk portion of my stack. I’ve got the money I need just need to live off it and make it last so my kids get a knot when I push daisies

I was asking about unforeseen traps not so much opinions
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91362 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

Not really. It’s tracked the SPY percentage wise pretty close and has also payed 10+% yearly on the divvy side which offsets the losses side.


It’s been around less than 3 years.

It’s a covered call strategy. The income will vary significantly, and won’t necessarily grow over time, so keep that in mind.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram