- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why wasn't the Sternberger fumble/drop reviewed?
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:48 am
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:48 am
I never heard an explanation (maybe there was 50 threads last night)... The knee down by Mond was rightfully reviewed because it was a critical play in the game. The clock it spike was rightfully reviewed because it was a critical play in the game. That fricking fumble should have been reviewed and reversed. Was Sternberger catch/fumble a non-reviewable situation for some reason? If it's due to the whistle being blown, i have a hard time believing the whistle blew before we recovered the fumble, happened very quickly. Maybe it did, anyone have replay with sound?
4
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:49 am to The Mick
There is zero chance that would be overturned
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:50 am to The Mick
the knee play was reviewed b/c it was a turnover
the "fumble" wasn't because it wasn't a turnover and was ruled dead
the "fumble" wasn't because it wasn't a turnover and was ruled dead
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:52 am to tigerfoot
quote:especially if they don't frickING REVIEW IT...
There is zero chance that would be overturned
Your statement is retarded.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:52 am to The Mick
Had it been reviewed it would have been upheld. That was an incompletion. Where we got scewed was the 4th and 18 they were given. Also the unfortunate no call when the QB’s knee touched. Had it been called right from the get-go we win easily, because they would have chewed up 20 seconds resetting.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:53 am to SlowFlowPro
I've see similar plays called dead reviewed often. When they determine a fumble, they give it to who recovered it at that spot (if the ball was advanced that is all negated).
The play wasn't reviewed due to the need to manufacture more drama. The game would have ended (again) there.
The play wasn't reviewed due to the need to manufacture more drama. The game would have ended (again) there.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:53 am to SlowFlowPro
So the CFB rule is different from NFL for this situation? In NFL, I know the play can be reviewed if there was a clear recovery even if blown dead. This play would definitely fall into that category.
O was definitely discussing with Ref after play so that what I assume he told him as to why they didn’t review. At least I hope that’s what they told him.
O was definitely discussing with Ref after play so that what I assume he told him as to why they didn’t review. At least I hope that’s what they told him.
This post was edited on 11/25/18 at 9:55 am
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Catch/fumble vs dropped pass isn't reviewable?
the "fumble" wasn't because it wasn't a turnover and was ruled dead
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:55 am to The Mick
Only to people that can’t inderstamd.
He never possessed the ball
Reviewing it would change nothing.
He never possessed the ball
Reviewing it would change nothing.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:56 am to Spotswoode
quote:I agree, they should have reviewed that spot, absolutely critical to the game and they just allowed it. Why wasn't O yelling his arse off?
Where we got scewed was the 4th and 18 they were given.
The LSU postgame show host, kind of a douche bag I dont even know his name, said the yellow line on the tv was wrong and the guy did get the first. I have no idea, but the line was way wrong on another play where they measured for it. So maybe he's right....
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:56 am to tigerfoot
He caught it and was running for a touchdown. How did he not possess it?
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:57 am to The Mick
Catch, step, fumble, game.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:57 am to The Mick
This has already been explained. The line was way off. It was at the 41 but the line was actually the 43
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:58 am to tigerfoot
quote:
Only to people that can’t inderstamd. He never possessed the ball Reviewing it would change nothing.
It definitely wasn’t clear one way or another. I wouldn’t have compliained if it was upheld. The point is that it was definitely worth a review.
The 4th and 18 play was WAY more deserving of a review that the SEC office or whoever is responsible for in game reviews clearly missed.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 9:59 am to STEVED00
quote:The ref softened O up all night, ref was giggling the whole game and O cracked a smile a couple times. Not sure WTF they were yucking it up about...
O was definitely discussing with Ref after play so that what I assume he told him as to why they didn’t review. At least I hope that’s what they told him.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News