- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why is every one on Jordan Jefferson's case?
Posted on 11/4/09 at 9:14 am to Mrs. Amaro
Posted on 11/4/09 at 9:14 am to Mrs. Amaro
If Lee went in and screwed it up, then they would want Shep playing QB. This from the same guys who say Shep sucks at QB, can't throw the ball, and will be a full time WR at LSU. They just keep throwing stuff at the wall, hoping that something will stick and they can claim to be right.
Posted on 11/4/09 at 9:16 am to TigerFan55555
quote:No, they don't.
That's why people want to see Lee in. They know he's better than JJ
Posted on 11/4/09 at 9:17 am to TigerFan55555
quote:
Now, do you see your lack of logic there. Your saying one ridley is better than the Scott but the Scott should still start
Because of intangibles that Chuck poseses. Steven hitting holes against a worn out toolame defense in the 4th quarter doesn't warrant him to start over a proven back in charles scott. Charles has the experience in big games against big time opponents that ridley doesn't have. I just wasn't going to go into all of this in a quarterback thread. Thanks for going off topic with me.
Posted on 11/4/09 at 9:26 am to TigerWilson88
quote:
No, they don't.
yes, they do. Overwhelminly...if JJ has a bad game against Bama it will be worse than after Fl..
quote:
over a proven back in charles scott
Still goes back to "what have you done for me lately.." Scott against "Toolame" doesnt count either.. He may be proven but he hasnt proven anything recently...When that happens in the NFL they draft a RB in the 1st rd.
quote:
Thanks for going off topic with me.
no prob
This post was edited on 11/4/09 at 9:27 am
Posted on 11/4/09 at 9:31 am to TigerFan55555
Scott doesn't fumble the ball often. That is proven. He can run through people and get first downs when we need them. That is proven. Steven is great, but is not yet proven to go against Bama yet. I say give him some touches certainly. But to take the opening handoff? What do you think? RS is a great athlete who was unproven and he fumbled in his first 3 carries and had a ball bounce off his chest that should have been snagged for a first down. We can't afford to test a young player in a big game like this in the first quarter.
Posted on 11/4/09 at 9:54 am to TigerWilson88
quote:
He can run through people and get first downs when we need them. That is proven.
quote:
RS unproven and he fumbled in his first 3 carries
False,He fumbled once, then when given the opp, he shut up every dumbass who believed he wasnt ready.
quote:
but is not yet proven to go against Bama yet.
How does anyone prove anything without the opportunity.
at some point your gonna run out of "proven" players unless you throw'em out there and see if they sink or swim...quit babying them, there not kids..
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:03 am to TigerFan55555
So you say start Ridley?
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:09 am to TigerWilson88
I would say start Keiland, have Shep and Ridley ready to go. A big back that isnt shifty isnt doing anything on Bama
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:14 am to TigerFan55555
quote:
No, they don't.
quote:No, they don't. A vocal and uneducated minority does not make a consensus.
yes, they do.
quote:And if JL or RS had a bad game against Bama the noise level would be exponentially worse (x 10) than what you hear now about JJ (which isn't much since Fla week).
.if JJ has a bad game against Bama it will be worse than after Fl..
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:17 am to TigerFan55555
quote:
he can run through people and get first downs when we need them. That is proven.
quote:Seriously? Do you watch LSU football?
whatever, he is the worst short yardage back in the history of LSU
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:18 am to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
No, they don't. A vocal and uneducated minority does not make a consensus.
It worked for Obama and the Democrats...
I'm trying to find the poll results for "who wants JL to play, it was like 98% our of 345,000 votes...
quote:
Seriously? Do you watch LSU football?
lots of it, I'm wondering what your watching...dont you see everyone making fun of the "Scott for 0 yards up the middle" thread scott misses all the time on 4th and 1 or 2...He sucks back b/c he has no momentum going forward unless he's past the whole....He isnt Hester..
This post was edited on 11/4/09 at 10:22 am
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:28 am to TigerFan55555
quote:
That's why people want to see Lee in. They know he's better than JJ
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:34 am to TigerFan55555
quote:
lots of it, I'm wondering what your watching...dont you see everyone making fun of the "Scott for 0 yards up the middle" thread scott misses all the time on 4th and 1 or 2...He sucks back b/c he has no momentum going forward unless he's past the whole....He isnt Hester..
Ok start Ridley then...I call BS on myself!!!
This post was edited on 11/4/09 at 10:41 am
Posted on 11/4/09 at 12:07 pm to TigerWilson88
Hot Carl, I thought your ranting privelages were revoked because your a liberal...why are you back?
Posted on 11/4/09 at 12:17 pm to TigerFan55555
quote:They're not a minority, they're a majority in both houses of Congress and the nation. Also, a majority voted for him, that's WHY he's in the Whitehouse. Are you seriously this stupid. This is like arguing with a 14 year old.
It worked for Obama and the Democrats...
quote:That was Rantards, anyone hiding behind a computer is going to make wild threats, doesn't mean it's credible.
I'm trying to find the poll results for "who wants JL to play, it was like 98% our of 345,000 votes.
quote:I'm watching him set records at LSU for rushing yardage, last year over 1,000 yards on a sucky team with a sucky QB, and records for TD's scored in a season and a career. I'm also watching him make short yardage 1st downs in major game situations and in big games time and time again. Has he failed a few times, of course he has, but no player is perfect.
lots of it, I'm wondering what your watching.
quote:Are you from Mars? All of your arguments are non credible and historically not factual. You must listen to a lot of daytime retard radio on AM stations like WWL.
He isnt Hester..
This post was edited on 11/4/09 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 11/4/09 at 12:59 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
I'm watching him set records at LSU for rushing yardage, last year over 1,000 yards on a sucky team with a sucky QB, and records for TD's scored in a season and a career. I'm also watching him make short yardage 1st downs in major game situations and in big games time and time again. Has he failed a few times, of course he has, but no player is perfect.
ok I call BS on myself again...start Chuck the Truck!!!
Posted on 11/4/09 at 1:08 pm to TigerFan55555
quote:great comeback, everyone who pwns you is a liberal or gay. Your intelligence level is about as low as your political IQ.
I found another flaming homsexual democrat who drinks cool-aid.
Posted on 11/4/09 at 1:11 pm to Tiger55
quote:
He should have performed like that against some of the other weak opponents we played.
Agreed. And how many sacks did Tulane have?
Posted on 11/4/09 at 1:23 pm to Mrs. Amaro
quote:
In my opinion he has played well in the last two games, he has not thrown more than one interception in a game... ever,
The last two games have been against cupcake teams. Jefferson can't perform under pressure and can't throw beyond the sticks in tight coverage. Also, when the pressure is on him in big games, I notice how he automatically avoids looking down field and starts lowering his head far too early. The kid is a nightmare at QB and is the prime reason we are not undefeated right now and couldn't score a TD against Florida.
Popular
Back to top



0



