- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Which returning CORE would you prefer to build around?
Posted on 7/10/25 at 12:41 pm to LSBoosie
Posted on 7/10/25 at 12:41 pm to LSBoosie
This post is not simply about returning production.
Let me also, apologize.
I thought the other negative response was yours as well. That’s on me.
I still think you are missing the point.
Let me also, apologize.
I thought the other negative response was yours as well. That’s on me.
I still think you are missing the point.
Posted on 7/10/25 at 1:27 pm to Kicks30
quote:
This post is not simply about returning production.
Let me also, apologize.
I thought the other negative response was yours as well. That’s on me.
I still think you are missing the point.
I know what the point is. You listed out all of the accomplishments of the guys in our 2 deep. My point was that there are several other teams that you could just blindly list out their accomplishments and it would look good on paper.
Don't get it twisted, I think LSU has a really good and talented team. My response wasn't me being negative. I just don't necessarily think your original post actually proves much besides saying "LSU has a good, talented team"
Posted on 7/10/25 at 3:02 pm to LSBoosie
Do you not see a difference in the freshman or sophomore guy that’s in line to take over and the guy who has 22 starts from the ACC or Big 10?
I know you are trying to make your comment fit the post, but this is NOT a simple 2 deep break down where half the roster is stepping into to a starting role for the first time?
This post is highlighting the fact that LSU on both offense and defense is combining nearly 2 complete squads that were starting elsewhere and bring them here.
It’s ALMOST merging 2 teams into one (ignoring depth).
And doing so on both sides of the ball.
I know you are trying to make your comment fit the post, but this is NOT a simple 2 deep break down where half the roster is stepping into to a starting role for the first time?
This post is highlighting the fact that LSU on both offense and defense is combining nearly 2 complete squads that were starting elsewhere and bring them here.
It’s ALMOST merging 2 teams into one (ignoring depth).
And doing so on both sides of the ball.
This post was edited on 7/10/25 at 3:04 pm
Posted on 7/10/25 at 3:14 pm to Kicks30
quote:
Do you not see a difference in the freshman or sophomore guy that’s in line to take over and the guy who has 22 starts from the ACC or Big 10?
I know you are trying to make your comment fit the post, but this is NOT a simple 2 deep break down where half the roster is stepping into to a starting role for the first time?
That's why I then pointed towards Clemson's returning production, which is what you specifically said this post is not about.
I mean hell your 1st team OL consists of:
1) a 1 year starter that wasn't good last year
2) A redshirt sophomore
3) Another redshirt sophomore with only 5 starts
4) A true sophomore
5) A guy who appeared in 5 hames as a freshman
That's not a lot of experience at all.
Popular
Back to top

1




