- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The LesBechler Theory
Posted on 1/21/12 at 11:11 am to tiger88
Posted on 1/21/12 at 11:11 am to tiger88
quote:
Both played before Les Miles earned equity in the LSU Bank & Trust, i.e. in 2008 after Flynn led the Tigers to the BCS championship (for the 2007 season).
*CLM did not dare rock the boat (i.e. begin to tinker and install the LesBechler) until after he had the job security (the "equity") to do so.
you're not nearly as smart as you obviously think you are. what boat would he be rocking? seriously...what the frick are you talking about?
quote:
Why is this so hard for some to understand?
because its borderline retarded...thats why
quote:
The LesBechler scheme will fail if that's his intention next season, is all I'm predicting here.
you're a moron
Posted on 1/21/12 at 11:14 am to tiger88
quote:
I hear ya, but, I witnessed a run of several games with my own eyes of J. Lee successfully managing the offense in 2011, only to be arbitrarily replaced with JJ.
I saw the Kentucky game. I think Les did too.
I remember the La. Tech game. I think Les did too.
The Kentucky game was the first game with JJ back on the team. The Tech game was the first meaningful playing time for Lee in a while.
Both games had the same thing in common...pressure to perform to prove you deserve to stay on the field. The results were:
Jarrett Lee 7-22 105 yds 4.8 yd/att
Jarrett Lee 8-21 169 yds 8.0 yd/att
I think Miles knew he was dealing with the same problems as usual and managed as best he could.
Posted on 1/21/12 at 11:55 am to Lee Chatelain
took me awhile to research these. 1987 miami 1990 col. 1997mich.2005texas . no comparison to 2011 schedule,try again.


Posted on 1/21/12 at 12:00 pm to randall blanchard
Even if they were comparable, the number of memorable examples of tough schedules like that is tiny. He could name four out of about 2500 schedules. Even if he could find 50, that puts LM in the top 2%.
Posted on 1/21/12 at 12:15 pm to DrEdgeLSU
No team is even close to the lsu 2011 schedule.13-1.Or i just don't know about it.Thats why i'm asking for help.Maybe somebody on sec rant knows :
Posted on 1/21/12 at 12:24 pm to Choctaw
quote:
you're not nearly as smart as you obviously think you are. what boat would he be rocking? seriously...what the frick are you talking about?
I'll attempt to explain it on here, again, as you clearly have trouble with my metaphors:
the boat (a noun): the state of the program at Saban's departure; that is, a program with all the hallmarks of an elite one.
rock (a verb): doing other than maintaining -- hiring quality coordinators (and letting them do their jobs); recruit, motivate, manage, and *coach -- by tinkering with what's been working (Seasons 1-3).
I'm just putting it out there, precarious as it may appear to be. Attacking me (e.g. "you're a moron") instead of countering my arguments with your own points, by the way, is classical signs of not knowing how to argue. And why would someone not know how to argue...hmmm, I don't know, perhaps intelligence?
This post was edited on 1/21/12 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 1/21/12 at 12:26 pm to Choctaw
quote:
you're not nearly as smart as you obviously think you are. what boat would he be rocking? seriously...what the frick are you talking about?
Agreed and it's laughable that this stupid arse thread is still going. OP getting his rocks off no doubt about all of this debate over his "theory".
I posted this before and I'll repost now. Basically, this isn't a "theory". It's a combination of a bunch of tired old rants against Miles that come up every time we lose a fricking game.
quote:
And I'm sure it gives you great pride to write some bullshite post and call it a "theory", but let me boil down your blabbering into two simple and worn out rants:
1) Coach Miles is boring and stooopid, and sometimes lucky.
2) Coach Miles won the 2007 with Saban's players (although to be fair you add in the totally new idiotic idea that he won it with Saban's PHILOSOPHY as well), and of course, a little luck.
Hate to burst your bubble chap, but we've heard it all before.
Of course, I'm sure you've been saving that up for the past year, so enjoy the next few months of the same old attacks on our coach until you're forced to sit in frustrated silence for another season as the wins keep piling up and you get to pounce on our next loss, whenever that may.
May you hold your breath until that day comes.
Seriously, idiots can't say Miles won with Saban's players anymore because the winning has continued at an unprecedented level long after Saban recruits are gone.
So now, they revise to say well, it wasn't just the players, it was the PHILOSOPHY. As if that 2007 team looked anything like a Saban LSU team ever did, especially the 04 team, which is actually what Miles took over.
I mean, seriously, how fricking pathetic are people?
This post was edited on 1/21/12 at 12:31 pm
Posted on 1/21/12 at 12:35 pm to tiger88
quote:
the boat (a noun): the state of the program at Saban's departure; that is, a program with all the hallmarks of an elite one.
GTFO of here with that shite.
LSU was NOT an elite program in 2004.
LSU had TWO seasons of less than 3 losses in the previous 17 years and one of them came under DiNardo.
Same old tired shite. Miles is Coker. LSU was nowhere near the level of Miami when he took over LSU.
Saban was great, I've never tried to belittle what he accomplished here, but the idea that LSU was some football juggernaut at the end of the 2004 season is simply not true and revisionist history.
Posted on 1/21/12 at 12:36 pm to DP40
quote:
DiNardo did NOT build THE foundation here at LSU, he inherited
you're quibbling over semantics. i interpret the op to mean that our FANBASE needed a recharge and DiNardo certainly did that. curly hallman damn near killed LSU football. if dinardo had sense of enough to hire a great DC, he'd of been a damn good coach too. the problem with LSU and coaches (head and assts) was THE BOS REFUSED TO PONY UP FOR QUALITY. it was a hit and miss thing for sure.
Posted on 1/21/12 at 12:36 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
Then stop following it and let people continue to enjoy the golden age of it.
I legitimately think the peak of LSU's golden age may be over. i dont think the decline will be rapid and it might not be drastic, but i think the pinnacle was the day before 1/9.
Rome wasn't built in a day and it didn't fall in one either. I think some LSU fans suffer from the Bill Polian syndrome. If you are winning then lets not take an honest evaluation of every part of an organization. Polian didnt take an honest look at his personnel while Manning was collecting Ws. Manning was a HUGE band aid for a lot of leaks on that team. When he was out they fell apart. Contrast that to the Pats when Brady went out. Cassell won 11 games and almost made the playoffs, but Miami also went 11-5, bc Belicheck refused to not push it.
Just because you won X amount of games doesnt mean you are clicking on all cylinders. The spark and excitement of Dinardo's "magic" was capitalized on an sustained by Saban's success, which made is popular for La kids to stay in state.
the talent La has put out the last 3 or 4 years has been the best ever for a state that has the most talent in the NFL per capita. I think LA will stay fertile, but wont produce year after the guys of the last 4 years. Miles has consistently out-talented people instead of out coaching or out-preparing them. My fear is that if the overall talent coming out of La. will somewhat decrease combined with such a poor showing in BCS NCG, and some top kids leaving LA will give other kids the thought its ok the leave the state as well.
I just fear that without the over-flow of talent LSu might not be as successful in the next 10 years as the were in the previous 10.
This post was edited on 1/21/12 at 12:38 pm
Posted on 1/21/12 at 12:39 pm to Tiger Voodoo
this is my last post in this thread because I've said enough. Did I think questioning *CLM or using an asterisk next to his initials would win me favor with the average IQ of this forum? No.
Do I care? No.
Am I an LSU fan? Yes.
Did I graduate from LSU? Yes
So, how could I question the football coach with such a record to date?
Because based on what I have seen of *CLM (and I watch closely) there is something spurious about how he coaches. And because he makes the $$$ he does representing my school, I think I'm justified in scrutinizing him commensurately; that is, to the level that I have with my theories.
I know I'm in the minority with my position on *CLM, but I am an LSU fan first.
Do I care? No.
Am I an LSU fan? Yes.
Did I graduate from LSU? Yes
So, how could I question the football coach with such a record to date?
Because based on what I have seen of *CLM (and I watch closely) there is something spurious about how he coaches. And because he makes the $$$ he does representing my school, I think I'm justified in scrutinizing him commensurately; that is, to the level that I have with my theories.
I know I'm in the minority with my position on *CLM, but I am an LSU fan first.
This post was edited on 1/21/12 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 1/21/12 at 12:41 pm to Tiger Voodoo
Lee Chatelain = name calling adolescent
also, it's would HAVE, not would OF
keep studying though sport, I see a GED in your future...
also, it's would HAVE, not would OF
keep studying though sport, I see a GED in your future...
Posted on 1/21/12 at 12:42 pm to Dissident Aggressor
Woah this thread is still going
Posted on 1/21/12 at 12:45 pm to tiger88
quote:
this is my last post in this thread because I've said enough.


Nice lowbrow insult of the "average IQ of this forum" on your way out. Surprising for someone who has such deep "theories" on things.
Posted on 1/21/12 at 12:51 pm to tiger88
Thank you for sticking with LSU. I might not agree with you but you are passionate for the tigers.
Posted on 1/21/12 at 12:52 pm to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
I expect several National Championships in the coming years.
they dont just hand those things out. I think LSU is talented enough to win next year but its tough to win a title out of the SEC. Thats why we have had a great spot in the game last few years, its so hard to get out of this league.
you have to have a lot of things working to win a title, (Bama this year and us '07 come to mind)
Posted on 1/21/12 at 1:00 pm to tiger88
quote:
Both played before Les Miles earned equity in the LSU Bank & Trust, i.e. in 2008 after Flynn led the Tigers to the BCS championship (for the 2007 season).
*CLM did not dare rock the boat (i.e. begin to tinker and install the LesBechler) until after he had the job security (the "equity") to do so. This, to me, may explain the inexplicable decision to pluck a hot-handed, several-games-undefeated JL and insert JJ. Why is this so hard for some to understand?
The LesBechler scheme will fail if that's his intention next season, is all I'm predicting here.
You seem to be way too butt hurt and are justifying crap to look logical. The NC game seems to have hurt your ego more than you are admitting. This thread does not deserve these many pages.
Now regarding your facts. 2005 started and ended with Randall as QB. We had QB controversy that year too. Russell was benched for the bowl game and led LSU in the 4th qtr for 13 points. Fans were whining about Saban and his 2004 coaching as well.
Between Rusell and Flynn, Miles coached for 3 years. You seem to parse credit only as convenient for your dumb argument.
NC game was poorly played/coached. Les needs to do better, should he have a similar opportunity again. Beyond that, you are wasting way too much time calling your random thoughts - logic, theory, prediction and whatever crap comes to your mind.
Posted on 1/21/12 at 1:30 pm to tiger88
quote:
I'm just putting it out there, precarious as it may appear to be. Attacking me (e.g. "you're a moron") instead of countering my arguments with your own points, by the way, is classical signs of not knowing how to argue. And why would someone not know how to argue...hmmm, I don't know, perhaps intelligence?
there's 12 pages of people countering your argument. you choose to ignore most of them....including mine.
Posted on 1/21/12 at 1:47 pm to randall blanchard
quote:
no comparison to 2011 schedule,try again.
Oh really.
1987 Miami: wins against #20 UF, #10 Arkansas, #4 Florida State, #10 Notre Dame, #8 South Carolina, #1 Oklahoma
1990 Colorado: wins against #8 Tennessee , #21 Illinois, #20 Texas, #!2 Washington, #22 Oklahoma
#2 Nebraska, #6 Notre Dame
You're an idiot if you think Florida, Auburn, Mississippi State, Tennessee, Kentucky, Ole Miss were good. They all sucked...UF, AU, and MSU had ZERO business being ranked in the Top 25.
Oregon, W. Virginia, Alabama, Arkansas, and Georgia are the only teams LSU played that deserved to be ranked in Top 25. Don't be stupid!
This post was edited on 1/21/12 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 1/21/12 at 2:07 pm to Lee Chatelain
End of year 2011 music city bowl miss. st -chick fil a bowl auburn- out back bowl geogia- gator bowl florida- Rose bowl oregon -cotton bowl a rkasas-orange bowl west virginia- bcsnc alabama. I trying not to be stupid.go back and read about each one of the seasons you have listed.your not close
Popular
Back to top
