Started By
Message

re: The intentional grounding/Smelley's catch etc

Posted on 11/10/09 at 11:38 am to
Posted by Crimson One
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
12 posts
Posted on 11/10/09 at 11:38 am to
quote:

BUT.....the refs definitely had a favorite team last Saturday.


Then why weren't the penalties I listed called (or not called depending on the case)? You can't have it both ways. The intentional grounding put LSU within a point AND gave them the ball back late in the third quarter. If you want to say that the non-interception was a bad call then I understand that but bias or a conspiracy does not hold up once you start asking questions.
Posted by abear75
New Iberia
Member since Jun 2009
107 posts
Posted on 11/10/09 at 11:56 am to
DO not stir the pot
Posted by Weaver
Madisonville, LA
Member since Nov 2005
27925 posts
Posted on 11/10/09 at 12:00 pm to
Crimson,

I found two for Bama. Smelley catch was complete, not incomplete. That was at 12:50 in the first quarter.

Also, at 10:35 in the second, RJ Jackson had a block in the back on Barron.

I did find two others for LSU though as well.

At 5:43 in the first, Cody hit Jefferson in the head on the long pass completion to Toliver. Also, at 14:45 in the second, Deangelo Peterson was hit out of bounds by Barron on a pass completion.

I have not finished watching the game, but I bet I will find more calls or no calls. I am not looking at holding, as that could be called on every play.
Posted by TexasTiger89
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2005
25750 posts
Posted on 11/10/09 at 12:22 pm to
The conspiracy theories are all over the media. See the stickied post at the top of the Rant. This was not started by Tiger fans. We are just bitching here.and rightfully so.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram