- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/15/17 at 7:13 pm to Grandioso
Stupid if true. Both venues have less capacity.
Posted on 3/15/17 at 8:45 pm to Grandioso
frick no. Home and home at two great stadiums.
Posted on 3/15/17 at 9:23 pm to Dalosaqy
Alleva will agree to Superdome and Texas will agree to only Austin
being the shrewd AD he is.
being the shrewd AD he is.
Posted on 3/15/17 at 9:27 pm to BordyLSU
quote:
Stupid if true. Both venues have less capacity.
So the demand would be higher than the supply. Why couldn't you just charge more (even substantially more) per ticket to even it out or make a greater profit?
Posted on 3/15/17 at 10:03 pm to Jizzy08
Well Go. Do you need a map or money or what?
Posted on 3/15/17 at 10:21 pm to Bamasuks
At least with the Alamodome you can get good seats almost anywhere. Of the 100k DKR seats, some look so far away from the action. I've been in the upper deck there closest to I-35, not necessarily a fun experience.
Posted on 3/15/17 at 10:59 pm to therick711
TV would like it. weather less a factor.
Posted on 3/16/17 at 7:21 am to CelticDog
Very curious how and how much switching LSU - Wisconsin home and home to NRG and Lambeau impacts total revenue...
LSU at Austin, TX and Texas at Death Valley MAKE for a great fan experience AND great Saturday TV...
Say it ain't so Joe...
LSU at Austin, TX and Texas at Death Valley MAKE for a great fan experience AND great Saturday TV...
Say it ain't so Joe...
Posted on 3/16/17 at 7:23 am to billfish21
LSU at Lambeau was historic despite the result... would have been full-on epic if Canada were our OC.
Posted on 3/16/17 at 7:44 am to Hulk Hogan
quote:
Why would either team give up revenues and incur more expenses?
You do realize the point of these neutral site games is to limit expenses? While putting a team on a bus or plane and getting hotels isn't cheap, it pales in comparison to the expense of putting on a home game. Security, traffic, etc for home games is way more of an expense than travel
Plus the gate for a game at the Superdome is about $10 million because they can charge higher ticket prices than an LSU or Texas home game.
So LSU and Texas get more money at a neutral site than play a home and home.
I agree this idea sucks for fans, but if you are talking about expenses and profit. It's not really close
Posted on 3/16/17 at 9:52 am to Grandioso
That "former colleague" is making this up.
LSU will play UT in Austin in 2019.
A year later, the two will play in Baton Rouge.
LSU will play UT in Austin in 2019.
A year later, the two will play in Baton Rouge.
Posted on 3/16/17 at 9:52 am to billfish21
quote:
Very curious how and how much switching LSU - Wisconsin home and home to NRG and Lambeau impacts total revenue...
quote:
LSU’s $3.4 million payday Saturday is more than the school nets from a home game in Tiger Stadium, Alleva said.
The two-year deal just sweetens things. The Green Bay Packers will pay LSU $2.1 million for the game at Lambeau Field in 2016. That’s $5.5 million for two games, well more than, say, a home-and-home series with the Badgers.
“When I play home and home with an opponent, I get a good pay day here at Tiger Stadium,” Alleva said, “but when I go on the road, I get nothing.”
LINK
Posted on 3/16/17 at 10:00 am to Grandioso
Oh gee I hope not.
I know UT fans want to experience Death Valley.
And I for one would love to see the Tigers play in DKR.
I know UT fans want to experience Death Valley.
And I for one would love to see the Tigers play in DKR.
Back to top
