- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Saban comments about rematch talk with ESPN reporter
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:31 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:31 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
What's wrong with what he said?
it's a big deal..
we have never had this happen before.
One would think the BCS system would avoid a rematch with in conference since we don't have a playoff system...The regular season should be the qualifier....
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:32 pm to DA
This the main problem I have with the "rematch". It renders the former "game of the century" meaningless from 'Bama's perspective. Also violates the holiness that was supposed to be the reglular season. Well, the reglar season is very important, unless it's not.


Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:33 pm to ApexTiger
It's funny that Bama fans act like its the norm to play other SEC teams in
Bowl games. No SEC team has done it for 50-60 years.
Bowl games. No SEC team has done it for 50-60 years.
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:33 pm to bama1959
quote:
Tied in regulation. You got the luck of the coin flip.
Just in case they failed to teach you basic math skills in gumpville you would still have only received 0 points for the 4th or 5th missed fg (hard to recall the exact number if shitty 50+ misses your dumb arse coach forced) no matter if it happened before or after LSU split the middle on theirs.
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:36 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
One would think the BCS system would avoid a rematch with in conference since we don't have a playoff system.
In order to make this happen you would have to have a whole lot of voters put an inferior team over a better one just to avoid a rematch.
The BCS isn't a season long playoff in the minds of everyone, and never will be. In fact, it's set up to put the number one vs number two in a one game championship. It did, and it worked. Many people still believe the number two team should be the second best team, and they voted that way.
Why are people so confused and still bitching about this? LSU is number one, in the championship vs a team we know they can beat.
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:37 pm to RogerTheShrubber
That is the point, the ranking of bama #2 contrdicts itself so far asI can see.
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:37 pm to bama1959
How do i do a quote in here , LOL Never mind I see it now
This post was edited on 12/19/11 at 6:40 pm
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:38 pm to White Tiger
quote:
It renders the former "game of the century" meaningless from 'Bama's perspective.
LSU won the SEC championship. It's a huge deal.
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:39 pm to White Tiger
quote:
That is the point, the ranking of bama #2 contrdicts itself so far asI can see.
No it doesn't. The system was never set up to eliminate a team with a loss.
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:40 pm to tigerskin2006
quote:
I wouldn't bet the farm on it.
More confident about this game than the Oregon game, or the regular season LSU vs Bama game. No way LSU loses.
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:42 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
are people so confused and still bitching about this? LSU is number one, in the championship vs a team we know they can beat.
I'm complaining because a huge rival gets a pass and a chance to knock off LSU...One turn over or one bad bounce could be the difference.
If you can't see that losing to Alabama will hurt far worse than to OSU, then I can't make the point of why I don't like Alabama getting a gift.
WE passed the test from the SEC...we advance undefeated! Alabama played one less game, has a loss and still advances....
All other SEC teams should be playing in another bowl...
I will never change my mind on this....
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:43 pm to bama1959
Geaux Tigers
This post was edited on 12/19/11 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:43 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Roger no one knows that Bama is better. Period. Just like everyone knew Bama would destroy Utah. Jut like everyone thought Miami would destroy Bama in 92.
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:45 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Roger no one knows that Bama is better. Period. Just like everyone knew Bama would destroy Utah. Jut like everyone thought Miami would destroy Bama in 92.
Everything favors LSU in the dome vs Bama. Some LSU fans will be embarrassed for bitching so much about the "rematch" come Jan. 10th.
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:46 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
LSU won the SEC championship. It's a huge deal
Which should earn you a possible spot in the MNC game...
check it did!
Bama plays Georgia Southern...then watches LSU play UGA for the honor of playing alabama in a rematch...It's backwards!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sports do not work like this
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:47 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I'm talking about Bama and OSU. No one knows whom would win that game. All we have is their resume. And osu is better.
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:48 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
Which should earn you a possible spot in the MNC game...
Nothing in the BCS NC is contingent upon you winning your own conference.
This post was edited on 12/19/11 at 6:49 pm
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:49 pm to Rickdaddy4188
In the future, I think the #2 ranking (after week 9) should be left void..until all teams have finished the season..
that would help fend off the ESPN pump machine that swong a lot of voters 2.5 weeks before the fiasco
that would help fend off the ESPN pump machine that swong a lot of voters 2.5 weeks before the fiasco
This post was edited on 12/19/11 at 6:50 pm
Popular
Back to top
