- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pleased to see ed ogeron recruiting socal
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:07 pm to Mr. Hangover
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:07 pm to Mr. Hangover
My apologies, I thought rick was talking about someone els but I didn’t make the post you’re quoting.
0
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:12 pm to Fat Bastard
That’s the thing, if somebody has a different opinion than mine I have no problem hearing them out. shite plenty of times people have convinced me that their side of the coin is valid and I need to widen my gaze on the subject. But with these dudes that’s not what they’re trying to do. They don’t want a two sided discussion they’re basically the thought police. Have you ever seen either of them adress someone with an opposing view cordially? No they start the personal attacks from the outset, most of the time they attack people who aren’t even in the same conversation. They surf this site 24/7 looking for anything that sets their gaydar off and then they jump. They’re the worst examples of what conversations and posters can be on the Rant.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 4:14 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:20 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Obsessed? So when you attack people for “shift work” or show your disdain for education like attacking Rick for going to Duke that’s all fine and dandy? But when it’s all thrown back in your face it means that person is obsessed? It’s funny you do this a lot, you make assumptions and accusations then when you’re proven to be a hypocrite and it comes back around you deflect or denounce the entire line of thinking. It shows two things, that you’re not self aware enough to look in the mirror before you make a characterization of someone els and B. That you can dish it out but you can’t take it. It speaks to the same pattern with you, a spiteful hypocrite with no self awareness.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 4:24 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:36 pm to Madking
absolutely. they are not here to discuss all the things i listed they are only here to argue and stay oblivious to perspective, rationality and objectivity. the problem is so many are football ignorant and do not want to learn and not even worthy of conversation. 
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:40 pm to Fat Bastard
People like that who don’t give a damn about the truth or facts can stay ignorant for all I care. The only bad apart about having those two zeros around is a lot of times we’re having good debates and conversations when they just jump in and fire bomb the whole thing. I’ve tried just ignoring em several times but somebody always gives them the attention the crave and always allows them to drive the thread completely off the rails.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:52 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
Max protect’ is a blocking scheme. Not a formatio
That you cant run out of every formation. There are max protect shotgun formations and some arent.
You know what i meant anyway.
He was calling formations that allow max protect instead of spreading teams out.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 4:55 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:56 pm to Rickdaddy4188
He’s not understanding what you’re saying Rick. What he’s thinking is max protect isn’t a formation like I or two tight, or 3 wide and he’s right. I understand what you mean that it’s a sub package, specific personnel group or formation which allows for max protect but I don’t think you’re being clear enough to someone who’s arguing the point.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 4:57 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:01 pm to Madking
quote:
or show your disdain for education like attacking Rick for going to Duke
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:06 pm to bencoleman
quote:
It’s all just silly little elementary type insults, projections and personal attacks
quote:
That's funny that's all I've ever seen from you. If you didn't have the personal attacks you wouldn't be able to post.
Well ain't that the pot calling the kettle black.Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:08 pm to Madking
quote:
e’s not understanding what you’re saying Rick. What he’s thinking is max protect isn’t a formation like I or two tight, or 3 wide and he’s right. I understand what you mean that it’s a sub package, specific personnel group or formation which allows for max protect but I don’t think you’re being clear enough to someone who’s arguing the point.
Agreed. I shouldn't have said formation because its not its own formation.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:10 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Jealousy looks good on you.
Where is your degree from rodger?
Where is your degree from rodger?
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 5:11 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:11 pm to earl keese
quote:
Well ain't that the pot calling the kettle black.
Look man,that's all this shite s. Positive people vs Les Miles loyalists. It's not going to ever change until Orgeron is gone. Then, the old guard will shite on the new guy.
These same threads are repeated every day. Nothing new to learn, just people flinging shite and screaming. These threads are absolutely shite shows
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:12 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Look man,that's all this shite s. Positive people vs Les Miles loyalists. It's not going to ever change until Orgeron is gone. Then, the old guard will shite on the new guy.
Loyalists? How about holding the new coach to the same standard that everyone agreed was underachieving?
I think everyone will be happy if that happened or if O starts winning titles.
The fact that you think only Miles loyalists are questioning the program just further shows that you have no clue what youre talking about. The vast majority of people i agree with on here were in no way miles loyalists.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 5:14 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:14 pm to Madking
right. you can be I form BIG/TIGHT, normal, twins, etc.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:14 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
How about holding the new coach to the same standard that everyone agreed was underachieving?
When Orgeron loses 5 of 9 games, I'll be off the wagon. Same standard.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:15 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
The fact that you think only Miles loyalists are questioning the program just further shows that you have no clue what youre talking about. The vast majority of people i agree with on here were in no way miles loyalists.
KABOOM!
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:16 pm to earl keese
quote:
Well ain't that the pot calling the kettle black.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:17 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
The fact that you think only Miles loyalists are questioning the program just further shows that you have no clue what youre talking about. The vast majority of people i agree with on here were in no way miles loyalists.
Same ole Ricky cut and paste job. No originality whatsoever.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:20 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Wrong I couldn’t stand Miles, the argument is between people dealing with reality and those who’ve moved the goal posts and lowered the standards for a coach who they hold above the program itself.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 5:21 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:21 pm to Madking
quote:
Wrong I couldn’t stand Miles
Apparently you're pissed off at everyone and everything. Might get one of those Crimson A script jackets from now on...
Page 9 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News