- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Play calling vs Execution
Posted on 9/29/10 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 9/29/10 at 2:13 pm
I've been beating this drum for a while now.
I still think the execution of plays is a bigger problem than the actual plays being called in as it should be obvious to everyone, regardless if it's coming from GC or LM.
I still think the execution of plays is a bigger problem than the actual plays being called in as it should be obvious to everyone, regardless if it's coming from GC or LM.
4
Posted on 9/29/10 at 2:16 pm to BT
In theory, execution is paramount.
In reality, play calling is supposed to give your players an advantage by increasing the probability that they will be able to execute.
If you call the wrong play, exection can be next to impossible.
In reality, play calling is supposed to give your players an advantage by increasing the probability that they will be able to execute.
If you call the wrong play, exection can be next to impossible.
Posted on 9/29/10 at 2:18 pm to BT
I agree for the most part.
If a few nicely thrown balls had been caught by our reception challenged receivers, the stats would look better.
Shepard you kind of expect being his first year as a receiver.
TT should be ashamed.
If a few nicely thrown balls had been caught by our reception challenged receivers, the stats would look better.
Shepard you kind of expect being his first year as a receiver.
TT should be ashamed.
Posted on 9/29/10 at 2:19 pm to ccomeaux
where does dropping passes, throwing behind, below, and over the head of your recivers, throwing ints and not seeing wide open guys in pass routes fit in to your theory?
Just curious.
Just curious.
This post was edited on 9/29/10 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 9/29/10 at 2:20 pm to BT
quote:True. There is no reason for us to have so many stupid penalties on offense. To false starts or a holding call can kill a drive.
I still think the execution of plays is a bigger problem than the actual plays being called in as it should be obvious to everyone, regardless if it's coming from GC or LM.
Posted on 9/29/10 at 2:23 pm to ccomeaux
quote:
If you call the wrong play, exection can be next to impossible.
actually, wrong. rarely is there only one play or one option called on a play.
we rarely have one wr run a route w/o the authority for the qb to choose other than his primary option.
rarely there is only a run play or a pass play called. usually both are called and the qb has the authority to check into the other play, depending on what the defense shows.
Posted on 9/29/10 at 2:26 pm to BT
I still think the execution of plays is a bigger problem than the actual plays being called in as it should be obvious to everyone, regardless if it's coming from GC or LM.
Here is my question... Does our offense EXECUTE the option in practice and then totally f it up in a game?? Any decent OC would have scrapped that play a year ago.
Here is my question... Does our offense EXECUTE the option in practice and then totally f it up in a game?? Any decent OC would have scrapped that play a year ago.
Posted on 9/29/10 at 2:30 pm to kennypowers11
on one hand, the offense must execute better. See JJ's bounce passes late in the game, drops by the WR.
On the other hand, playcalling has also been bad. See option plays withh JJ, calling screen passes at the wrong time, etc.
When execution and playcalling is bad, you have a bad offense. Plus, the guy calling the plays is the QB coach, which is the one significant weakness on this LSU team. Add all that together and it = 102
On the other hand, playcalling has also been bad. See option plays withh JJ, calling screen passes at the wrong time, etc.
When execution and playcalling is bad, you have a bad offense. Plus, the guy calling the plays is the QB coach, which is the one significant weakness on this LSU team. Add all that together and it = 102
Posted on 9/29/10 at 2:30 pm to kennypowers11
quote:
Here is my question... Does our offense EXECUTE the option in practice and then totally f it up in a game?? Any decent OC would have scrapped that play a year ago.
if you had a passing game, you would care less about the option.
Posted on 9/29/10 at 2:31 pm to dos crystal
quote:
actually, wrong. rarely is there only one play or one option called on a play.
Fair enough. I was speaking to our situation. I don't see JJ calling many audibles.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News