People brag about the data available to the CFB committee

And how every stone is turned in the process.

Hope they look at the following in Bama's "5 point loss":

1) The chance of Bama winning throughout the game. LSU was near 90-95% most of the game
2) Waddle gets full credit for the TD, and that offsets the Tua fumble perhaps, but he benefitted by a freak spin to free him and direct him.
3) Also, the "analysts staff" gets full credit for the quick snap when Stingley was not ready.
4) Everyone who watches that game knows that while it is in thw record books as a 5 point deficit, LSU was dominant, aside from the beast RB Harris.
5) Bama was sloppy and unprepared, and needs to be detracted from an "eyeball test" and performance perspective.

Again, trying to give credit where it is due, but that damn committee better not trot out with Bama in the 4th spot with a "only loss by 5 to LSU" narrative.

If they do that, throw all the fancy data and committed logic out the window.