- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: North Carolina= trouble
Posted on 1/16/10 at 11:22 pm to BT4LSU
Posted on 1/16/10 at 11:22 pm to BT4LSU
LINK
Pitt: 1 fumble (1 fumble lost), 1 missed FG; 10 drives, 5 scoring (1 TO, 1 missed FG, 2 punts, game ends)
So first, your facts are so blatantly wrong that it's not even worth taking this seriously, but even if they were, you're only proving the point: if Pitt is so badass on offense that on paper they should have covered/won by 20+/etc, why didn't they? Because UNC's defense is even more badass, that's why.
The offense for UNC is the problem. From the same game: UNC 9 drives, 3 scoring drives (2 TOs, 1 TO on downs, 3 punts). That's abysmal.
Pitt: 1 fumble (1 fumble lost), 1 missed FG; 10 drives, 5 scoring (1 TO, 1 missed FG, 2 punts, game ends)
So first, your facts are so blatantly wrong that it's not even worth taking this seriously, but even if they were, you're only proving the point: if Pitt is so badass on offense that on paper they should have covered/won by 20+/etc, why didn't they? Because UNC's defense is even more badass, that's why.
The offense for UNC is the problem. From the same game: UNC 9 drives, 3 scoring drives (2 TOs, 1 TO on downs, 3 punts). That's abysmal.
Posted on 1/16/10 at 11:26 pm to lsutothetop
Now this is funny....
So in other words......
50% of their possessions ended up scoring. Half of their possessions resulting in points.
1 TO.
2 punts.THE ENTIRE GAME
Oh yeah, bad arse.
Oh and one more thing... they fumbled 4 times, losing one fumble, and STILL averaged nearly 6 yards a play.
Worthless post, flamer.
quote:
10 drives, 5 scoring (1 TO, 1 missed FG, 2 punts, game ends)
So in other words......
50% of their possessions ended up scoring. Half of their possessions resulting in points.
1 TO.
2 punts.THE ENTIRE GAME
Oh yeah, bad arse.
Oh and one more thing... they fumbled 4 times, losing one fumble, and STILL averaged nearly 6 yards a play.
Worthless post, flamer.
This post was edited on 1/16/10 at 11:30 pm
Posted on 1/16/10 at 11:28 pm to BT4LSU
Actually Pitt was 5/5 in the Red Zone the UNC defense held them to 1 Touchdown and 4 field goals. The only reason Pitt was in position for any of these was because of the 409 Return yards they amassed.
I really doubt you even watch 1 UNC game because you know very little about UNC or their games.
I really doubt you even watch 1 UNC game because you know very little about UNC or their games.
Posted on 1/16/10 at 11:29 pm to downwitsloflo
quote:
when is the last time LSU curb stomped someone?
2007 VaTech!
We get dat swagga back in '10.....Book It!
Posted on 1/16/10 at 11:31 pm to Number 3 is my Hero
Yep, the return game, the offense, the prevent defense. all did wonders for UNC last year.
Like I've stated, you're a complete flamer.
Oh and one more thing....
I know UNC will lose to LSU, and I'm tired of your worthless, anti Miles/LSU flames.
Like I've stated, you're a complete flamer.
Oh and one more thing....
quote:
I really doubt you even watch 1 UNC game because you know very little about UNC or their games.
I know UNC will lose to LSU, and I'm tired of your worthless, anti Miles/LSU flames.
This post was edited on 1/16/10 at 11:33 pm
Posted on 1/16/10 at 11:32 pm to BT4LSU
quote:
Like I've stated, you're a complete flamer.
Yes, the insult of those who do not know. Surprised you did not bring up the bandwagon since you like to voice inaccurate opinions about things you obviously do not know about. I am sorry if me correcting you offended you and by the way please show me where I said UNC would win the game.
K Thanks
Posted on 1/16/10 at 11:33 pm to BT4LSU
quote:
I know UNC will lose to LSU, and I'm tired of your worthless, anti Miles/LSU flames
Link?
Posted on 1/16/10 at 11:36 pm to Number 3 is my Hero
You sure sound like LSU is doomed, #24 wannabee...
Posted on 1/16/10 at 11:37 pm to BT4LSU
quote:
You sure sound like LSU is doomed, #24 wannab
Why because I am not a homer?
So apparently unless you believe LSU will curb stomp UNC you are a "flamer"
Really you people are starting to reach for things now.
Posted on 1/16/10 at 11:47 pm to Deep Purple
Just like Virginia Tech.
Posted on 1/16/10 at 11:52 pm to StrangeBrew
quote:
Just like Virginia Tech.
Really they are not, and even if they were LSU is not the same team as the 2007 version. Most people could tell that with the play from past couple seasons.
Posted on 1/16/10 at 11:53 pm to Number 3 is my Hero
Not at all, you saying LSU will fail next year, without any proof to the same, is my reason to call you a flamer.
If you're thinking that the teams are pretty even, you may have some explaining to do...
if Miles beats Davis and his great defense... right?
If you're thinking that the teams are pretty even, you may have some explaining to do...
if Miles beats Davis and his great defense... right?
Posted on 1/16/10 at 11:55 pm to BT4LSU
quote:
Not at all, you saying LSU will fail next year, without any proof to the same, is my reason to call you a flamer.
Link? I have called 8-4 record next season for awhile now, just scroll through my post history. I do not understand the little complex you have now.
Really you should scroll through my post history, cause you are only making yourself look retarded. And just because you put it in bold does not make it important
This post was edited on 1/16/10 at 11:56 pm
Posted on 1/17/10 at 12:34 am to BT4LSU
Make up your mind, fool. Either Pitt wasn't executing well and should have won by 20+ or they were executing well and UNC is good enough on defense to keep themselves in the game.
Your argument was that Pitt was terrible executing until the stats proved you wrong, so now you're changing your story and acting like I'm in the wrong.
Your argument was that Pitt was terrible executing until the stats proved you wrong, so now you're changing your story and acting like I'm in the wrong.
Posted on 1/17/10 at 12:40 am to Number 3 is my Hero
Unless LSU undergoes a major change in offensive philosophy I think UNC wins this one. They were as bad as LSU on offense last year, but I think they have shown in '08 that they were capable of using their weapons if they have them. I think UNC's defense will give them the edge. Low scoring game, doubt either team scores more than 24.
Posted on 1/17/10 at 12:57 am to Number 3 is my Hero
quote:
Really they are not, and even if they were LSU is not the same team as the 2007 version. Most people could tell that with the play from past couple seasons.
--------------------------------------------
This is sad, and really pissing me off.
I simply don't see you as an LSU fan, your posts over the last several months don't give us any indication you are.
Look,#3,and the rest of the LSU/Miles flamers, I'm going to make it as easy as I can for you.
This is not 2007.
IT AINT 2008 or 2009, EITHER.
LSU has key leaders, specifically players in key positions next year, to take these last two years and shove it down these idiots' throats.
The coaching, as bad as it supposedly has been, was 2 plays away from a 11-2 and Top 5-6 finish
this past year. Yet everyone wants to harp on a
the negatives, and you wish to challange the people who see positives.
You're a flamer for doing it. You're adding to the demise of LSU. Props.
Everybody knows Miles has been a poor game clock manager. He makes some bad calls, and he lets the coordinators do too much sometimes. He's also a great recruiter, a good planner, and an excellent special teams guy. IMO, he also can improve because of the talent he has available.
He's loyal as they come, and because of that specific loyalty he's made TWO critical mistakes: 1) trusting his friends as co-coordinators under Pellinis system; and 2) NOT stepping in earlier when it became apparent JJ was not picking up GC's system as quickly as he hoped.
He's addressed BOTH. Last year he hired Chavis,
and Ron Cooper. Had LSU's defense been able to get off the field, LSU would have had an outstanding year. Can you not see the whole picture?
So the offense sucked in 2008.
We "only" went 9-4.
GC's offense either flourishes or flounders on the QB making proper reads. JJ had a month to prepare for GT, and then suffered because 1) the Ol never jelled; and 2) he was having trouble with his reads. Les needed a QB coach to plug the hole.
This year, he's hired Gonzales. He brought a QB coach to come in and help JJ. The same guy also has WR experience and will help the development of gamebrakers like Randle and Shephard. Gonzales is a QB/WR coach who shadowed some of the greatest college football offenses EVER.
Can you not see the whole picture?
Well let me help you a little more. Perhaps you should look at what Butch Davis has done lately.
Butch Davis now has a HISTORY of crappy offenses, far worse than Miles could ever create. His special teams suck. He can, and will be outcoached a lot more than you think. Many UNC fans simply think he's not motivated, and goves little overall effort outside the defense, PERIOD. A most recent article in the Charlotte Obsever said the same thing.
I was dead against his hire at LSU, and know for a fact we nade a better move hiring Les Miles.
Once more...Do you see the whole picture?
Disagree?
Then answer me this: if the teams are equal, what will the negatigers say when LSU (and moreso, Les Miles) destroys UNC (and moreso, Butch Davis) ?
I hope that clears things up for you.
Now, in case you don't understand how LSU fans feel offended by some of the things you've stated, well, perhaps this might help.
I hate #3.
The most overrated NASCAR driver in NASCAR in the 1990s.
He was a wife cheating, foul mouth, son beating drunk who regularly WAS ALLOWED to cheat to win, HAD to cheat to win, who without Chevy's lopsided moneybag was half the driver people think.
He was actually washed up long, and mean LONG before he died, and he died because he was simply too freaking stupid and actually thought his "legend" earned him the idiotic "right" to intentionally drift down and think no one would challenge his equally idiotic lane block.
As a result, he died... HE caused his own death, no one but he himself.
And had he been racing now, and drifted again, he'd be just as ignorant, and probably just as dead, because he was too stupid to take anyone's advice on head gear.
Given the same set of rules, #3 simply wasn't that good. That same ignorance allowed Gordon to blow by him, as did Labonte in the mid 1990s, renderiung him as sad as an old man could be,
like Arnold Palmer was in his last 10 Masters tourneys.
Richard Petty, in his prime, would have beaten the hell out of him. Jeff Gordon, with half the experience, DID.
The NASCAR kids today. given the same field, would have took that "badass' attitude and spit it back real quick. When I drive into Concord or Kannapolis on Highway 3... honestly...I'm embarrassed by any fool in Kannapolis that still grives in front of his fence a DEI, and laugh that Dale Jr simply dropped DEI for the cheaters they are.
Anyone that still thinks #3 is their "hero" are no better than gumps that idolize Bear Bryant, a coach that would be equally as inept in this generation, are as stupid as they come.
[b] BTW....have a GREAT day.
This post was edited on 1/17/10 at 1:03 am
Posted on 1/17/10 at 12:59 am to Deep Purple
Miles h2h with Davis puts LSU in a 3 TD hole before the game even starts
Posted on 1/17/10 at 1:01 am to LSUsmartass
LSUsmartass needs an education. Show up and watch
in the Georgia Dome, flamer.
in the Georgia Dome, flamer.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News