- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Most overachieving LSU Nat'l champs?
Posted on 7/15/09 at 10:35 am to roygu
Posted on 7/15/09 at 10:35 am to roygu
quote:
In your opinion, what does an LSU quarterback need to do to rate above average
How bout throwing for more than 130 yds vs Kentucky? 17 of 35 is pretty average
or 24 of 44 with 3 ints vs a pretty weak Bama squad
Im not trashing the kid. The question was asked and I gave my opinion. I think looking back that team was not as "talented" as many would like to think. That is all
eta: for all the hate JR gets on this site, the 2006 team was a better team, just didn't get the breaks the 07 team got.
This post was edited on 7/15/09 at 10:42 am
0
Posted on 7/15/09 at 12:32 pm to Catt
quote:
Flynn & Mauck were solid QBs that didn’t kill you with mistakes
Because they had the easier odd numbered year schedule AND great players around them. Mauck threw 14 INTs, and Flynn threw 11. Jamarcus was a better QB than Matt Flynn in every way other than scrambling. He threw more TDs, less INTs, more yards, had a higher completition %, and finished with the same amount of losses despite a much tougher schedule, so the 2007 title is more so due to lucky breaks, an easy schedule, and a great offensive coordinator.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News