Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

More responsible for current state of affairs?

Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:07 am
Posted by gumbodawg
Baton rouge
Member since Dec 2003
396 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:07 am
F King?
Alleva?
Ponamsky?

The Prince could go down as the most infamous figure in LSU athletics. Smoke and mirrors, PR ploys, media manipulation, Bindergate. All so he could get a university provided pullover and a corner office...
Posted by Watchmaker
Member since Aug 2016
768 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:10 am to
Look in the mirror. It's the citizens fault. They keep getting fleeced, keep buying tickets and cheap tee shirts, and keep falling for promises of Heisman trophies and SEC championships.

The party is over. We hire bozos at the university.
Posted by Duckie
Tippy Toe, Louisiana
Member since Apr 2010
24314 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:11 am to
quote:

F King?
Alleva?


they have not put us in a great position.
Posted by clamdip
Rocky Mountain High
Member since Sep 2004
17886 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:11 am to
Look at the bright side. Ponamsky could be putting lives in jeopardy steering boats in the Mississippi instead.
Posted by Bigtigah
Sportsman's Paradise
Member since Sep 2006
3929 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:22 am to
Alleva
Posted by DaDaTigers
Member since Oct 2013
273 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:27 am to
Alleva. He's the AD and supposed to be the leader of the Athletic Department but he has absolutely no leadership skills. If so, he would have stood his ground last year and gotten rid of Miles then but he gave in from pressure by F'King. Then this year, he conducts his coaching hire through the media, which turned into a schit show. Can't wait until he's gone.
Posted by TigerNlc
Chocolate City
Member since Jun 2006
32494 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:31 am to
All 3 need to be run out of town with the quickness
Posted by AA77
Member since Jan 2016
3796 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:33 am to
Skip Bertman. Should've fought to keep Saban.
Posted by TigerB8
End Communism
Member since Oct 2003
9286 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:36 am to
I just want to know what the difference is between the economies of say Alabama, MIssissippi, and Louisiana that has the Louisiana economy in the tank. It seems that the other two states are well off enough that those states don't question what is paid the head football coaches. Why are the other two states so much better off fiscally, they don't have to worry about state meddling in coaching salaries?

I'm grasping at straws here. Has to be the money that continues to interfere in the success of the football program. What has say...Tennessee and Mississippi done so well fiscally that allows their goverment to stay the f$%k out of college athletics? Did Jindal really screw the state that bad? I don't live In La anymore so i'm out of the loop. This is just ridiculous to have a Ferrari of a program that can compete with the best but the top admins don't want to spend money on the high octane gas to run it because it wouldn't look good.
Posted by YouAre8Up
in a house
Member since Mar 2011
12792 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Ponamsky could be putting lives in jeopardy steering boats in the Mississippi instead.


Didn't he get in some trouble over that?
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14663 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:47 am to
quote:

F King?
Posted by dannyz68
baton rouge
Member since Aug 2010
66 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:48 pm to
possibly the fan base
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram