- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Maybe now we can hang 60+ points on McNeese and other cupcakes
Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:17 pm to siliconvalleytiger
Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:17 pm to siliconvalleytiger
quote:
I'm still waiting on you to get a sports prediction right.
STFU and answer the question PUNK. Oh thats right, YOU CAN"T. FRICKIN LOSER!!!
Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:18 pm to siliconvalleytiger
quote:
Tsk tsk. If you don't get help here, make sure you get it on another board.
Ok I'll meet you there. But you gotta quit beating up on little kids first.
Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:20 pm to notiger1997
quote:
I am not asking for 60 points, but a smooth looking offense against much weaker teams is not too much to ask.
Defne smooth looking. A touchdown every play? Maybe a first down every play? No incompletions?
Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:24 pm to dukke v
quote:
The BCS is a STYLE points kinda system.
So yeah, we need to.
Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:30 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
quote:
The BCS is a STYLE points kinda system.
So yeah, we need to.
Beating Mcneese 65-0 Does NOTHING for our BCS chances.

Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:31 pm to dukke v
quote:If your cute little economy car that's advertised at getting 50mph only gets 12, but gets your from Point A to Point B in one piece, would this be acceptable? It's all about expectations. Just like opinions and A-holes.... we all have them. Our performance vs. expectations is a barometer of things to come - especially when tough competition is on the horizon. It also serves as valuable feedback - like we get from friends, family and counselors as to how we're doing. I think knowing how we're doing is a good thing.
I am waiting for someone to tell me WHY its so important to Score 60. OR BLOW a cupcake out????
This post was edited on 1/13/11 at 6:40 pm
Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:32 pm to dukke v
quote:
STFU and answer the question PUNK.
Stick to your meds - old, useless fart.
Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:38 pm to siliconvalleytiger
quote:
STFU and answer the question PUNK.
Stick to your meds - old, useless fart.
Like I said,...................
Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:40 pm to dukke v
Does wonders for TCU and BSU
Votes still make up much of BCS and voters get all gooey over clubbing baby seals like Mcneese.
Votes still make up much of BCS and voters get all gooey over clubbing baby seals like Mcneese.
Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:40 pm to dukke v
quote:
Why does it matter that we score 60??? Or blow them out. As long as we WIN those games is whats important. Beating Mcneese 31-13 is fine with me. You are a STYLE pints kinda guy.
Why do you think LSU was ranked higher in the computers than it was in the polls. Why do you think Boise State was ranked ahead of LSU even after they lost to Nevada? You do know that the human polls are 2/3 of the BCS formula, don't you?
Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:41 pm to tigerpawl
quote:
If your cute little economy car that's advertised at getting 50mph only gets 12, but gets your from Point A to Point B in one piece, would this be acceptable? It's all about expectations. Just like opinions and A-holes.... we all have them. Our performance vs. expectations is a barometer of things to come - especially when tough competition is on the horizon.
I think you missed the point. I would rather win a cupcake game in a somewhat reasnol maner and save what we have for the BIG BOYS. I STILL don't see what t matters why we have to beat La Tech, or ULL , OR Mcneese by 60 points except for the YOUNG bandwagon fans that only want to see DOMINATION. We gave everything we had to beat Bama and were flat against Mcneese. SO we won.
Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:42 pm to Uncommon Cents
quote:
But you gotta quit beating up on little kids first.
I'm not advocating beating up on anybody. Point is we let many inferior teams hang around with us because the offense could not score early points on bad defenses. La Tech last year and even McNeese hung around with us this year. And it wasn't as if we weren't trying.
LSU has scored points on weaker teams before with second, third string players. Without trying to run up the score. I don't think this is disrespectful at all. Its also called a 'tune up' game for a reason. None of this was happening with Crowton.
Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:44 pm to trackfan
quote:
You do know that the human polls are 2/3 of the BCS formula, don't you?
Sure I do. So you are saying a win over Mcneese is just as good as a win over Miss State??? With the same score in each.
Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:45 pm to siliconvalleytiger
Hanging 60 on McNeese St. makes you feel more manly or something?
Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:46 pm to siliconvalleytiger
LSUs offense was pedestrian because of the fact they have a dumbass at QB, not the offensive coordinator. Can't call much when your QB is too stupid to decipher an defense.
Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:53 pm to Mayhawman
quote:
Does wonders for TCU and BSU![]()
Votes still make up much of BCS and voters get all gooey over clubbing baby seals like Mcneese.
It also helped Alabama against teams like San Jose State, Duke and Georgia State. National title contenders are supposed to make cupcakes look like high school teams. In 2003, LSU beat Louisiana Tech 49-10 which seems pretty ordinary. But what was extraordinary was the halftime score of 49-3. It takes an elite team to do that to a team who had beaten Michigan State earlier in the season. Boise State's starters routinely spend the second half of cupcake games on the bench and avoiding injury, which is exactly what LSU's starters should be doing against teams like McNeese State..
Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:53 pm to dukke v
quote:The assumption is that you control the outcome of the game before it starts and you will win vs. the little guy. When the outcome is threatened by an unexpected close game, then that is cause for alarm, assuming that a close game was not your outcome of choice. It's reasonable to conclude that if you struggle vs. the little guys now, you will get your brains beat out vs. the big guys later. It is cause for concern and a clear message there is something wrong with the current state of the team and needs attention. This is a reasonable conclusion.
I would rather win a cupcake game in a somewhat reasnol maner and save what we have for the BIG BOYS.
This post was edited on 1/13/11 at 7:00 pm
Posted on 1/13/11 at 6:55 pm to dukke v
quote:
Sure I do. So you are saying a win over Mcneese is just as good as a win over Miss State??? With the same score in each.
Of course not. What I'm saying is that when you struggle with teams like McNeese State, you get punished by the pollsters.
Posted on 1/13/11 at 7:00 pm to trackfan
[quote]spend the second half of cupcake games on the bench and avoiding injury,[/quote Also developing and giving PT to youngsters.
Posted on 1/13/11 at 7:00 pm to dukke v
quote:
Why does it matter that we score 60??? Or blow them out. As long as we WIN those games is whats important. Beating Mcneese 31-13 is fine with me. You are a STYLE pints kinda guy.
I'm sure you were thrilled with the performance we had against Mcnesse and those other slapdick schools
Popular
Back to top



1


