- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lunch with O thread
Posted on 10/4/16 at 12:17 am to slackster
Posted on 10/4/16 at 12:17 am to slackster
See, you're never going to be taken for anything other than how everyone is treating you now.
No matter if it was a simple question or not, you did this to yourself. You aren't to be taken seriously. While I agree that for the most part plays were still the same plays, it felt way different due to tempo, sequencing, personnel mixups including new targets, and i cannot remember seeing LSU running 4 wide many times the last 5 yrs.
The team went from looking in disarray and a dumpster fire to looking like a well coached and oiled machine that would've annihilated Mizzou if a long ball or two would've been completed.
No matter if it was a simple question or not, you did this to yourself. You aren't to be taken seriously. While I agree that for the most part plays were still the same plays, it felt way different due to tempo, sequencing, personnel mixups including new targets, and i cannot remember seeing LSU running 4 wide many times the last 5 yrs.
The team went from looking in disarray and a dumpster fire to looking like a well coached and oiled machine that would've annihilated Mizzou if a long ball or two would've been completed.
1
Posted on 10/4/16 at 12:35 am to 0jersey
quote:
No matter if it was a simple question or not, you did this to yourself. You aren't to be taken seriously.
quote:
While I agree that for the most part plays were still the same plays, it felt way different due to tempo, sequencing, personnel mixups including new targets, and i cannot remember seeing LSU running 4 wide many times the last 5 yrs.
Yeah the frequency of the 4 wide was definitely a change of pace. IIRC we came out against Jacksonville State in a similar look, but Harris's 1-4 start quickly ended that. Etling actually started off 1-4 too, but the difference Saturday is that we stuck with it. We didn't bail on any strategy too early and eventually everything was coming up roses.
Posted on 10/4/16 at 1:44 am to musick
quote:
"I'd love to put both LF and Guice on the field at the same time"
HB wheel routes would be great for those guys. I think that would be a LBs nightmare to try and cover either of those guys in open space.
Posted on 10/4/16 at 5:56 am to Jwho77
quote:
Using a lot of TEs, WRs and RBs now prevents the defense from knowing what play is coming or what player is the primary target on pass plays based solely on specific personnel groupings.
This seems so obvious and simple, and it is not a certainty that this was the exact reason, but it definitely was one of the positive results. When you saw Williams and Ferguson or Gage in the game, you were left wondering just what in the hell was coming. And then out of nowhere, one of these packages would produce a toss dive for a nice gain. It was quite awesome
Posted on 10/5/16 at 7:05 am to slackster
Don't kid yourself dude...this wasn't about one thread...your crap is everywhere....take the hint...stfu
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News