- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSUAD is videotaping students chanting obscenities.
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:00 pm to sardog12
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:00 pm to sardog12
quote:
Sorry that I missed a comma and you are incapable of understanding without that much needed comma.
Your sentence was gibberish. Has nothing to do with a missing comma.
quote:
BTW, are you the grammar police now?
Nope. But I do have a command of the English language, unlike someone here.
2
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:01 pm to Vanilla Ice
I'm waiting for the students to try and chant it during a basketball game. The aftermath will be hilarious.
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:02 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Nope. But I do have a command of the English language, unlike someone here.
Obviously not, if you couldn't understand what I was requesting, even without the comma.
This post was edited on 12/16/13 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:04 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Your sentence was gibberish. Has nothing to do with a missing comma.
Since you are simply trying to derail this with your lack of comprehension, I will try this again in more simple sentences.
Please point out one statement that you quoted that is incorrect. Please provide an example.
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:05 pm to sardog12
quote:
please point out one statement that you quoted that is incorrect with an example
An example of what? You sentence is gibberish. Are you asking for me to quote an example me quoting an example of a quote of yours that is incorrect?
Sure seems circular.
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:07 pm to sardog12
quote:There was no reversal. Those two statements are perfectly in line with each other, and there is nothing in them that makes them antonymous.
This reversal is what makes you a hypocrite.
quote:In the legal/Constitutional sense, yes, as I've stated clearly numerous times in the thread. Any time in this thread I've referred to free speech, it is in a strictly moral and de facto sense. Policing someone else's free speech is morally reprehensible, and anyone who thinks that it isn't is a coward and a pig who may go frick himself.
Freedom of speech doesn't apply here anyway.
quote:Absurdist. You're still in the dark on that one.
Again, absurd analogy.
quote:I think you should try to learn why analogies exist and what purpose they serve in a debate so that when I say "Never 'negotiate with a terrorist,'" you will not need to inform me that "This has nothing to do with terrorists, terrorist behavior, or anything like terrorist behavior," since I'm the one who made the fricking analogy and call it an analogy.
This has nothing to do with terrorists, terrorist behavior, or anything like terrorist behavior. You should try to make an analogy that would make sense.
You are failing language arts.
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:07 pm to sardog12
quote:Heroes.
grammar police
quote:Terrorists.
language police
quote:Analogies.
Analogies
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:09 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
quote:
please point out one statement that you quoted that is incorrect with an example
An example of what? You sentence is gibberish. Are you asking for me to quote an example me quoting an example of a quote of yours that is incorrect?
Sure seems circular.
In all seriousness sardog, nobody knows what the hell you're talking about at this point.
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:14 pm to LNCHBOX
Calling out retards for being retards is one of my favorite pastimes. Continue throwing your tantrum. This has been going on for a while, you might need to go get some medicine for your sandy vagina.
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:16 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
Calling out retards for being retards is one of my favorite pastimes. Continue throwing your tantrum. This has been going on for a while, you might need to go get some medicine for your sandy vagina.
Yep, I'm the one with a tantrum in this thread.
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:17 pm to CarRamrod
quote:Typical language from the Language Police. This is why your opinion is not to be legitimized by serious discussion.
Calling out retards for being retards is one of my favorite pastimes. Continue throwing your tantrum. This has been going on for a while, you might need to go get some medicine for your sandy vagina.
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:18 pm to LNCHBOX
I really dont know, i saw your posts on the first page and remember you have been whining about this for a while. If you have gotten over it and see the business side of this and not just through the eyes of a student, great. I apologize if that is the case.
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:19 pm to ballscaster
quote:
Typical language from the Language Police.
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:21 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
I really dont know, i saw your posts on the first page and remember you have been whining about this for a while
If anyone is whining, it's the people trying to make it go away.
quote:
f you have gotten over it and see the business side of this and not just through the eyes of a student, great. I apologize if that is the case.
Actually I look at it from the much more realistic perspective that they can't do anything to stop it. Their best course of action would be to not play it for at least four years to get a new cycle of students that hopefully don't know the chant. Making it such a focus is only making the problem worse.
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:25 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:Realistic way to look at it, yes.
Actually I look at it from the much more realistic perspective that they can't do anything to stop it. Their best course of action would be to not play it for at least four years to get a new cycle of students that hopefully don't know the chant. Making it such a focus is only making the problem worse.
How about replacing "Neck" with "Gonna Fly Now," a catchy tune from 1976 composed by LSU alumnus Bill Conti and featured in an obscure boxing movie from the same year and starring Sylvester Stallone?
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:27 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Actually I look at it from the much more realistic perspective that they can't do anything to stop it.
quote:thats the route it is....They tried to bring it back from all the outburst of it not being played for a while, and the students shite the bed again.
Their best course of action would be to not play it
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:29 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
thats the route it is....They tried to bring it back from all the outburst of it not being played for a while, and the students shite the bed again.
Yea, trying to bring it back with this cycle of students is idiotic at best. They had to know what was going to happen.
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:32 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:And thank God that it did. It turned out to be a great opportunity for the LP to shout "Well I never!" and lecture us on what's appropriate and inappropriate etc.
They had to know what was going to happen.
This post was edited on 12/16/13 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:32 pm to LNCHBOX
yep. It will take more than 4 years. there still will be people yelling it 4 years down the line and it wont take long for the students to start chanting it again. The song is dead.
Posted on 12/16/13 at 4:32 pm to ballscaster
quote:
There was no reversal. Those two statements are perfectly in line with each other, and there is nothing in them that makes them antonymous.
Really? You stated that it is up to the university to police itself, which you support, otherwise you shouldn't have made the statement. Now you complain that they are doing just that. I am simply stating that you are contradicting yourself and by continuing to proceed with the latter argument makes you a hypocrite. It can't be stated any more simple than that. Even you should be able to understand this.
quote:
In the legal/Constitutional sense, yes, as I've stated clearly numerous times in the thread. Any time in this thread I've referred to free speech, it is in a strictly moral and de facto sense. Policing someone else's free speech is morally reprehensible, and anyone who thinks that it isn't is a coward and a pig who may go frick himself.
But this is not an open and public free-speach forum. It is a university event and they reserve the right to act as they feel necessary. It is printed as such on the ticket: "The LSU Athletic Department reserves the right in its sole discretion, without the refund of any portion of the ticket price, to refuse admission to or eject any person whose conduct is deemed to be disorderly, disruptive of others or who uses abusive or threatening language." What part of this sentence do you find difficult to understand? So you are correct that the university should police its own, which it is doing in this case.
quote:
Absurdist. You're still in the dark on that one.
Me stating that it is an absurd analogy is only connected to your claim of "absurdist" in the name sounding similar. This doesn't change that your analogy is absurd. Try looking up that word also.
Page 24 of 45
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News