- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/3/08 at 9:28 pm to dsheely
Whoever loses that game should commit collective self-immolation.
Posted on 10/3/08 at 9:31 pm to TheHiddenFlask
quote:
The Pac-10 is incredibly hard.
I agree 100%. Hardest conference in America to go undefeated in. I went back 30 years of seasons and fewer teams have gone undefeated in conference play in the PAC-10 than any other.
Posted on 10/3/08 at 9:37 pm to MJRuffalo
quote:
The Pac-10 is incredibly hard.
Posted on 10/3/08 at 9:39 pm to dsheely
quote:
If Alabama or LSU lost that game
One of them WILL lose that game. And the AP doesn't matter. BCS is the champ.
Posted on 10/3/08 at 9:48 pm to MJRuffalo
quote:
I agree 100%. Hardest conference in America to go undefeated in. I went back 30 years of seasons and fewer teams have gone undefeated in conference play in the PAC-10 than any other.
True...the "great" teams always choke...ie...the USC Condoms last week!
You're definetly in the minority thinking the PAC-10 is the toughest conference.
Posted on 10/3/08 at 9:49 pm to TigerWatch
We are not the toughest conference this year, that is clearly the Big-12. I ma saying that historically The PAC-10 is proves to be the toughest conference to go undefeated in.
Posted on 10/3/08 at 9:55 pm to MJRuffalo
At no point in this decade has the Pac 10 been anywhere close to the best conference.
Posted on 10/3/08 at 9:57 pm to LSUJuice
quote:Same can be said of the NC game participants too, many years. It's all semantics, why ya think the NCAA won't touch it?
But being the "best in your conference" is only semantics. The SECCG winner is not necessarily the best in the conference. LSU in 2001 wasn't.....
Posted on 10/3/08 at 9:58 pm to MJRuffalo
The reason no one goes undefeated in the pac 10 is because you're all a bunch of sissies.
Posted on 10/3/08 at 10:02 pm to Cornholio
quote:
At no point in this decade has the Pac 10 been anywhere close to the best conference.
FAIL
College football data warehouse had the PAC-10 rated #1 through his mathematical formula until last season for the entire decade. Right now the SEC is #1, slightly ahead of the PAC-10 for the current decade. His formula accounts for win%, SOS, NC's, and Big-4 bowl wins.
Also in 2000 the PAC-10 had 3 of the final AP top 7
Posted on 10/3/08 at 10:05 pm to MJRuffalo
quote:
College football data warehouse had the PAC-10 rated #1 through his mathematical formula until last season for the entire decade.
I'm sure every college football expert in the country would agree with that.
Posted on 10/3/08 at 10:09 pm to Cornholio
The math does not lie.
Posted on 10/3/08 at 10:13 pm to MJRuffalo
quote:11-6? Don't tell them the #7 team in the PAC beat our runner-up last year. Course, our conference divsion champs are jus semantics.
The math does not lie.
Posted on 10/3/08 at 10:14 pm to MJRuffalo
But your calculator is broken
Posted on 10/3/08 at 10:17 pm to dsheely
LSU loses to ALA and goes 11-1, ALA loses to Moo St and goes 11-1 and goes to the SEC Championship game. They lose to a 10-2 Georgia.
ALA 11-2
GA 11-2
LSU 11-1
Who goes to MNC?
ALA 11-2
GA 11-2
LSU 11-1
Who goes to MNC?
Posted on 10/3/08 at 10:23 pm to JeauxBleauxTigerFan
quote:And your PAC10 and Bama is pretty obvious...as is your smack weak.
But your calculator is broken
Posted on 10/3/08 at 10:29 pm to Geauxtiga
I am saying decade rankings from 2000-present. Anyway the SEC is #1 right now, but up until 2006 it was the PAC-10.
Posted on 10/3/08 at 11:47 pm to MJRuffalo
In 2004, Auburn went undefeated in the toughest conference in the country.
Posted on 10/3/08 at 11:49 pm to MJRuffalo
I say save the discussion about who has and has had the best conference for another thread.
To the original poster I say the loser of the LSU/Bama game gets the sugar assuming that is their only loss and the winner of the seccg gets a spot in the mnc assuming they have only one loss. The loser of the lsu/bama game with one loss would be high enough in the final bcs poll. This is what happened in 2006 when florida crushed tosu and we crushed notrelame in the sugar, that was the best solution imho.
If the winner of the lsu/bama game loses to a 2 loss east team then the secg winner would get the sugar and the lsu/bama loser again assuming that is their only loss gets a bcs at large bid. The sec west winner now with 2 losses gets the best bowl outside of the bcs for a sec team which I think is the capital one???
To the original poster I say the loser of the LSU/Bama game gets the sugar assuming that is their only loss and the winner of the seccg gets a spot in the mnc assuming they have only one loss. The loser of the lsu/bama game with one loss would be high enough in the final bcs poll. This is what happened in 2006 when florida crushed tosu and we crushed notrelame in the sugar, that was the best solution imho.
If the winner of the lsu/bama game loses to a 2 loss east team then the secg winner would get the sugar and the lsu/bama loser again assuming that is their only loss gets a bcs at large bid. The sec west winner now with 2 losses gets the best bowl outside of the bcs for a sec team which I think is the capital one???
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News