- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:41 am to Choctaw
Is it April 1st again?
Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:43 am to Choctaw
if the DA does not pursue charges or if the charges are dropped he needs to be welcomed back with apologies.
Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:43 am to Darren
This post was edited on 9/15/11 at 11:46 am
Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:46 am to D500MAG
quote:
if the DA does not pursue charges or if the charges are dropped he needs to be welcomed back with apologies.
Why does LSU need to apologize to him? Playing football is a privilege that was taken away. If he is innocent, will be reinstated and rightfully so, but he could have avoided the entire mess by staying at his apartment. No one from LSU owes him an apology.
Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:46 am to Choctaw
If he is re-instated I don't care what the do with him as long as he isn't starting QB... It isn't about Lee either... If Met earns the job then by all means let him start. IMO JJ shouldn't be starting QB.
Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:46 am to slackster
agreed...no apology needed. we definitely dont NEED him. he will just be a distraction with the media constantly asking players about this shite.
Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:48 am to tigermannola83
quote:
agreed...no apology needed. we definitely dont NEED him. he will just be a distraction with the media constantly asking players about this shite.
+1
Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:48 am to Choctaw
Just because charges may be dropped, it does not mean JJ is "innocent" of what allegedly happened.
Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:49 am to LsuTool
quote:
Just because charges may be dropped, it does not mean JJ is "innocent" of what allegedly happened.
In the eyes of the law it does.
Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:49 am to LsuTool
quote:
Just because charges may be dropped, it does not mean JJ is "innocent" of what allegedly happened.
and it doesnt mean he is guilty because he was arrested.
Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:50 am to LSUBlitzkrieg
quote:
If the man is not guilty he needs to be back on the team but not as the starter.
:kige:
Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:51 am to Choctaw
quote:
In the eyes of the law it does.
In the eyes of tiger fans it doesn't.
Les Miles/LSU does not have to operate under the law. Miles could still suspend/discipline him, even if the charges are dropped. If a player told Miles he was there and JJ did it, I would have no problem with Miles disciplining JJ.
Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:52 am to LSU_Lou
Getting in a fight is one thing, kicking someone on the ground when it appears he was not any threat to anyone at that point is borderline stupid. Had the players walked away at that point they may not have ever been suspended or charged. As far as I'm concerned, however this case is resolved it would be in the two players suspended to go play elsewhere.
Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:52 am to Choctaw
quote:
Just because charges may be dropped, it does not mean JJ is "innocent" of what allegedly happened.
In the eyes of the law it does.
no it doesn't.
Try again super-fan.
Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:53 am to TigersOfGeauxld
the same people that hate Jefferson are the same people pulling for Mett, someone who actually sexually assaulted a young woman.
gotta love this place.
gotta love this place.
Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:53 am to LsuTool
quote:
In the eyes of tiger fans it doesn't.
not all....just the stupid ones.
quote:
Les Miles/LSU does not have to operate under the law. Miles could still suspend/discipline him, even if the charges are dropped. If a player told Miles he was there and JJ did it, I would have no problem with Miles disciplining JJ.
he already has.
so you're saying that JJ is guilty...no matter what happens...and shouldn't be allowed back
Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:53 am to Choctaw
quote:
well i just assumed that. i thought you may have have another reason though, as to why an innocent player (if true) should not be allowed back on the team.
the dude aint innocent son Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:54 am to CptBengal
quote:
no it doesn't.
ok...if charges are dropped how can he be found guilty?
Posted on 9/15/11 at 11:54 am to Walt OReilly
quote:
the dude aint innocent son
link? or is it that you don't want him to be innocent?
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News