- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:09 pm to liquid rabbit
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:10 pm to GoldenBoy
The "X factor"? No.
One of many factors? Sure.
An important factor? Maybe. Probably.
A vital factor? Hard to say. very possible, but would be hard to prove either way.
One of many factors? Sure.
An important factor? Maybe. Probably.
A vital factor? Hard to say. very possible, but would be hard to prove either way.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:12 pm to USMCTiger03
Yep...the three JJ bashers I expected to see did in fact post in this thread. 
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:13 pm to TIGRLEE
quote:Most TD's from QB scrambles occur inside the 5. So why would it be relevant to point out?
its a bit relevent that you mention a qb sneak from the 1 foot lne, a jump pass from the 2 foot line and a option keeper from the 3.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:13 pm to GoldenBoy
Should be a great game, but I don't think it will be offensively. Bama has not played any team that LSU has been playing and beating.
Penalties, field position, turnovers, take-aways, big plays, just one minor mistake will determine this game.
My biggest issue will be the refs, the reviews, and clock management, which LSU excels in this year.
I look for LSU to play JJ more because of his running. I look to see Hillard to play more. LSU will stop Bama in their offense.
I predict a low scoring game..........
LSU 9- Bama 6
yep ....no TDs scored........LSU will break the tie of 6-6 on the last play of the game with a field goal, Lee will come through on the last drive....it will be a classic.....
LSU defensive team will be awarded " Player of the Game".....
Game will be remembered as " The Game of the Trenches"..
Penalties, field position, turnovers, take-aways, big plays, just one minor mistake will determine this game.
My biggest issue will be the refs, the reviews, and clock management, which LSU excels in this year.
I look for LSU to play JJ more because of his running. I look to see Hillard to play more. LSU will stop Bama in their offense.
I predict a low scoring game..........
LSU 9- Bama 6
yep ....no TDs scored........LSU will break the tie of 6-6 on the last play of the game with a field goal, Lee will come through on the last drive....it will be a classic.....
LSU defensive team will be awarded " Player of the Game".....
Game will be remembered as " The Game of the Trenches"..
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:13 pm to CptBengal
quote:
because you don't agree with my opinion?
No, because your opinions suck cock.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:14 pm to CptBengal
quote:
because you don't agree with my opinion?
yep, thats why.
Plus you have an agenda.
If they agreed with you then its an opinion.
Since they dont, well its an agenda.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:14 pm to liquid rabbit
quote:
Sometimes, Jefferson is the "why" factor
Plenty were saying "why?" when he tossed the 42yd TD and then stfu real quick like.
The guyh is an LSU player throwing 60% with a 12.5ypa and still dissed.
That's the "why?" of it.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:14 pm to Bobby Moore
quote:Miles will be blamed
LSU 9- Bama 6
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:16 pm to Hot Carl
quote:
because you don't agree with my opinion?
No, because your opinions suck cock.
Please god dont reproduce, there are enough stupid people already.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:17 pm to Roaad
quote:
Most TD's from QB scrambles occur inside the 5. So why would it be relevant to point out?
b/c he wasnt playing unitl then? another guy was.
IDK,, total guess.
Thats almost like saying KHillard is going to be the xfactor... although Sware had 7 carries for 59 yrds in the drive that got us down inside the 5.
Come on bro, you arent that stupid.... you just want to argue.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:17 pm to TIGRLEE
quote:
Plus you have an agenda.
quote:
TIGRLEE
Agenda expert up in here.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:18 pm to TIGRLEE
quote:
Plus you have an agenda.
If they agreed with you then its an opinion.
Since they dont, well its an agenda.
What I find funny is they think their opinion matters to me on any level. It's quite comical how they all vie for recognition of their opinions from anonymous users on an internet message board.
You would hope it would be the reactions of 12yr old girls.....alas, it is not.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:18 pm to Mayhawman
quote:
Agenda expert up in here.
Ive never labeled anyone as having an agenda.
You have though.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:19 pm to TIGRLEE
quote:So?
b/c he wasnt playing unitl then? another guy was.
How does that make it more relevant?
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:21 pm to Roaad
do you agree or disagree with the KHill/SWare analogy I made?
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:22 pm to TIGRLEE
quote:no. It is flawed, unless you think Lee was going to run it in.
do you agree or disagree with the KHill/SWare analogy I made?
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:23 pm to CptBengal
quote:
do you expect this to occur?
Well, you shifted your argument from one post to another.
First you said he wouldn't play enough plays to be an "x factor." Then you said, it's not the number of plays, it's the percentage, when I pointed to a flaw in your "logic."
Whether or not I expect this to occur is irrelevant to that the fact that you "guaranteed" he wouldn't be the x-factor. You are the one who staked a claim here, not me. I said pretty clearly that Jefferson would be a factor, but not likely "the" x-factor.
It's both possible that Jefferson could score 4 times and that he could do nothing. The reality likely lies somewhere in between.
Because I've seen you argue it before, (like last year you routinely say we lose to Tennessee and Florida without Lee), Jefferson could score the game winning TD. If he orchestrated the entire drive and put us ahead for good (let's say he scores on the last play of the game to give us the win). I don't even have to guess to know that you would quickly say that we would have never been in that position if it wasn't for Lee. Despite the fact that you also would turn around and say we can't win without Lee vs. Tennessee or Florida (who in that case was playing the hypothetical role of JJ as I described above).
Because that's what you do. Any evidence that doesn't support your false assumptions is tossed out. Assume the best of Lee, the worst of JJ. Maximize the importance of Lee, minimize the importance of JJ. You do it again and again and again, in thread after thread after thread.
BTW, have you ever managed to present an argument without ad hominem attacks? I didn't think so.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 1:28 pm to Roaad
quote:
no. It is flawed, unless you think Lee was going to run it in.
JL cant run it in or jump pass it from the 1 foot line?
Why do you insist on agruing about things that are so inconsequential and irrelevant.
You know damn well the point Im making and for some reason you feel the need to make some stupid arguement.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News