- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is this really a 1 time deal?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:54 pm to wildtigercat93
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:54 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
Again putting a stop to it this year does not prevent them from making the exact same new legal arguments you are envisioning here.
I get that you think these are 2 totally different arguments, but im explaining how they are related to one another.
By not stopping it, it absolutely gives them ammunition to make the exact argument i am saying, next year, and they will have a much better chance of winning that lawsuit next year based on pro players being allowed to play this year= Slippery Slope
Sorry if you cant connect those dots. i cant make it much easier for you.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 1:06 pm to GeauxLSUBengalTigers
quote:
what cutoff point do you say 25 year olds going against 18 year olds coming out of high school is too much?
It's a pro league no cut off why does one man have a right to earn and the other doesn't ?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 1:13 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
The only reason these 5/5 injunctions are happening are because the NCAA put the 5/5 rule in place after the players declared. Next year no player can argue they didn’t know they would have an additional year of eligibility
Correct and from here forward it doesnt matter if you red shirt or not Your done after 5 years almost seems like this rule was made because of Chambliss maybe we should blame him.
Popular
Back to top


0




