Started By
Message

re: Is this really a 1 time deal?

Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:54 pm to
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
12973 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:54 pm to
quote:


Again putting a stop to it this year does not prevent them from making the exact same new legal arguments you are envisioning here.


I get that you think these are 2 totally different arguments, but im explaining how they are related to one another.
By not stopping it, it absolutely gives them ammunition to make the exact argument i am saying, next year, and they will have a much better chance of winning that lawsuit next year based on pro players being allowed to play this year= Slippery Slope

Sorry if you cant connect those dots. i cant make it much easier for you.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 12:58 pm
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
42557 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

what cutoff point do you say 25 year olds going against 18 year olds coming out of high school is too much?


It's a pro league no cut off why does one man have a right to earn and the other doesn't ?
Posted by Robcrzy
Mandeville
Member since Nov 2007
1547 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

The only reason these 5/5 injunctions are happening are because the NCAA put the 5/5 rule in place after the players declared. Next year no player can argue they didn’t know they would have an additional year of eligibility



Correct and from here forward it doesnt matter if you red shirt or not Your done after 5 years almost seems like this rule was made because of Chambliss maybe we should blame him.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram