- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
International Players Dominate LSU Rosters
Posted on 5/23/26 at 11:30 am
Posted on 5/23/26 at 11:30 am
During a recent interview with Meghan Kelly, Patrick McEnroe, brother of John, recounted how he watched the SEC men's tennis championship match and learned that just two of the 12 participants are Americans. He found similar results in the ACC and even smaller conferences playoffs. So why are U.S. athletic departments bypassing U.S. citizens in favor of foreigners. Is the quality of domestic tennis that bad?
LSU's men's and women's tennis teams are very good, posting 2026 records of 26-7 and 22-10 respectively. Nine of the 10 players on the men's team are non-Americans. The team drew just 677 spectators to its first NCAA playoff match despite offering free admission and free parking. Neither of the two opponents the Tigers faced in the playoffs had a single American players Only five of the the 12 players on the LSU women's team are Americans. Neither LSU team has a Louisiana player on its roster.
Other non-revenue generating sports are over-represented by foreign players -- 12 to just six U.S. golfers and the majority of the Men's Track & Field roster are non-Americans.
What is the reason for this? Why spend so much of Athletic Department resources on scholarships and international recruiting for foreign athletes instead of U.S. citizens, who pay those expenses.
Redirecting LSU's focus to young American athletes may make the respective teams less competitive, but who cares? Help develop the U.S. players.
LSU's men's and women's tennis teams are very good, posting 2026 records of 26-7 and 22-10 respectively. Nine of the 10 players on the men's team are non-Americans. The team drew just 677 spectators to its first NCAA playoff match despite offering free admission and free parking. Neither of the two opponents the Tigers faced in the playoffs had a single American players Only five of the the 12 players on the LSU women's team are Americans. Neither LSU team has a Louisiana player on its roster.
Other non-revenue generating sports are over-represented by foreign players -- 12 to just six U.S. golfers and the majority of the Men's Track & Field roster are non-Americans.
What is the reason for this? Why spend so much of Athletic Department resources on scholarships and international recruiting for foreign athletes instead of U.S. citizens, who pay those expenses.
Redirecting LSU's focus to young American athletes may make the respective teams less competitive, but who cares? Help develop the U.S. players.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 11:33 am to Tenntig
quote:
Redirecting LSU's focus to young American athletes may make the respective teams less competitive, but who cares? Help develop the U.S. players.
Unless the laws change I just want LSU to win.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 11:33 am to Tenntig
quote:
Why spend so much of Athletic Department resources on scholarships and international recruiting for foreign athletes instead of U.S. citizens, who pay those expenses.
Yeah, we need more Mondo's
Posted on 5/23/26 at 11:35 am to LSUfan4444
Because tennis is largely a non-revenue sport, with limited big money opportunities for professional players.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 12:07 pm to Tenntig
I've said this before and got downvoted into oblivion. There is zero reason ever for an American college or pro team to immigrate talent. Those opportunities should be for Americans.
Back to top
3







