Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

How much are rankings worth

Posted on 2/2/12 at 3:48 pm
Posted by Providince
Member since Dec 2010
45 posts
Posted on 2/2/12 at 3:48 pm
Here is a list to Rivals top 100 for 2009: LINK
Not many early entrant superstars.
2008 had a better rate of hits.
LINK
BTW, Andre Luck was #68 and was a 4 star.

Here are the rankings of how rivals rated each draft class in 2008
LINK
and in 2009
LINK

While the 2009 class shows Bama and LSU #1 and #2 the other top ranked teams are all over the board.

I see people getting all worked up over these rankings but honestly, has there been ANY evidence that these rankings directly correlate to on the field and programatic success?
Posted by TigerWoody
btwn where I was & where I will be
Member since Dec 2007
11387 posts
Posted on 2/2/12 at 3:51 pm to
bitches gotta bitch
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
35786 posts
Posted on 2/2/12 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

I see people getting all worked up over these rankings but honestly, has there been ANY evidence that these rankings directly correlate to on the field and programatic success?


Yes. I don't have any facts or analysis to back it up but it is the truth and you're an idiot if you don't agree with me.
Posted by Ghostfacedistiller
BR
Member since Jun 2008
17501 posts
Posted on 2/2/12 at 3:54 pm to
I posted this on the Recruiting Board earlier. I'm posting it again....

Okay, so grabbed the the Rivals top 100 classes from 2005-2011 and looked at the total numbers of eventual all americans from 2009-2011.

I used wikipedia as it is most comprehensive and lists every player named AA by any service. Whatever, I'm not looking to get published.

I know AA is not the end all be all, obviously, but it's an indicator of how rankings translate on the field. I'd rather have a team of players ranekd 101-180 than the top 10 and the rest garbage.

Results as you would expect: being highly ranked doesn't guarantee success but it seems to increase the probability. It's a very inexact science so you shouldn't get too high or too low based on these rankings.

In 3 years, you have 47 players coming from the rivals 100 list in their respective year (Players are double counted if they make multiple teams, Patrick Peterson, Andrew Luck, etc.). In total there were 47 of 221 players ranked in the Rivals 100 (21.2%).

Average Rank: 38.3
Median Rank: 30
Range: 97 (2-99)

I didn't do this as some justification for LSU's "poor" recruting class, I did it because I'm bored and curious. Regarding LSU, do think we lost some guys we should have had, and that sucks, but we filled our needs and got some great players who are excited to be Tigers.

Interesting to see the list and where they were ranked:

2011 AA
#68 Andrew Luck

#6 Trent Richardson

#15 Sammy Watkins

6 Robert Woods

#62 Orson Charles

#60 Barrett Jones

#11 Matt Kalil

#14 Alex Okafor

#94 Fletcher Cox

#72 Jarvis Jones

#11 Dre Kirkpatrick

#55 Mark Barron

#30 T.J. McDonald

2010 AA
#68 Andrew Luck

#28 Cameron Newton

10 Marcus Lattimore

#9 A.J. Green

#99 Alshon Jeffery

#61 Lee Ziemba

#12 Michael Brewster

#2 DaQuan Bowers

#93 Drake Nevis

#9 Vontaze Burfict

#5 Patrick Johnson

#55 Mark Barron

#71 Rahim Moore

#41 Cliff Harris

2009 AA
8 C.J. Spiller

9 A.J. Green

85 Dorin Dickerson

70 Bryan Bulaga

76 Derrick Morgan

15 Brandon Graham

51 Ndamukong Suh

4 Gerald McCoy

64 Brian Price

31 Jared Odrick

35 Rolando McClain

13 Brandon Spikes

5 Sergio Kindle

59 Joe Haden

5 Patrick Johnson

3 Eric Berry

16 Taylor Mays

90 DeAndre McDaniel

71 Rahim Moore

27 Greg Reid


Posted by rileytiger
Surfing The Gulf of America
Member since Feb 2007
4079 posts
Posted on 2/2/12 at 3:55 pm to
I never heard of Patrick Johnson. He must have been one of those 5 star recruits that never panned out.
Posted by Ghostfacedistiller
BR
Member since Jun 2008
17501 posts
Posted on 2/2/12 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

I see people getting all worked up over these rankings but honestly, has there been ANY evidence that these rankings directly correlate to on the field and programatic success?


I made a spreadsheet with the Rivals top 50 classes from 2002 to 2012 and also the average end of season rankings (coaches and ap) for teams from 2000-2011. I ran out of time to correlte them all but will do it tomorrow. I'll forward the Excel to anyone interested.
This post was edited on 2/2/12 at 3:58 pm
Posted by Ghostfacedistiller
BR
Member since Jun 2008
17501 posts
Posted on 2/2/12 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Patrick Johnson


Total bust
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21650 posts
Posted on 2/2/12 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

as there been ANY evidence that these rankings directly correlate to on the field and programatic success?


Sure. the teams that rank higher on recruiting are usually more successful. About as clear cut as it gets IMO. Of course you're gonna have some misses and some guys like Luck who were underrated, but overrall those lists are pretty on point.
Posted by Ghostfacedistiller
BR
Member since Jun 2008
17501 posts
Posted on 2/2/12 at 4:15 pm to
Look for yourself. Here are the Rivals Top 10 classess for all current players (except Kase Keenum?)


2007
1 Florida
2 USC
3 Tennessee
4 LSU
5 Texas
6 South Carolina
7 Auburn
8 Notre Dame
9 Georgia
10 Alabama


2008
1 Alabama
2 Notre Dame
3 Florida
4 Ohio State
5 Miami (FL)
6 Oklahoma
7 Georgia
8 USC
9 Florida State
10 Michigan

2009
1 Alabama
2 LSU
3 Ohio State
4 USC
5 Texas
6 Georgia
7 Florida State
8 Michigan
9 North Carolina
10 Tennessee

2010
1 USC
2 Florida
3 Texas
4 Auburn
5 Alabama
6 LSU
7 Oklahoma
8 UCLA
9 Tennessee
10 Florida State

2011
1 Alabama
2 Florida State
3 Texas
4 USC
5 Georgia
6 LSU
7 Auburn
8 Clemson
9 Oregon
10 Notre Dame


Posted by steadytiger
Member since Jan 2007
2756 posts
Posted on 2/2/12 at 4:25 pm to
nm
This post was edited on 2/2/12 at 4:27 pm
Posted by SouthernB
Coastal Alabama
Member since Jan 2012
93 posts
Posted on 2/2/12 at 4:38 pm to
I don't know why so much is made of ranking a recruiting class other than it's just human nature. You really don't know what that class is going to be until the players in it get to their junior and senior years or gone on. The sidenotes to college recruiting are full of 4 and 5 star recruits bombing and just as many 3 star recruits becoming super stars. It's just recently that I've decided the Bama's 2008 class was a great one but most of the signees have moved on.
Posted by Broketec
Dumpster Fire
Member since Sep 2006
1226 posts
Posted on 2/2/12 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

How much are rankings worth


$0.85

Posted by msully
Nashville
Member since Aug 2011
1088 posts
Posted on 2/2/12 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

Providince
How much are rankings worth


Here is a list to Rivals top 100 for 2009: LINK


For making Bets , now I guess you could say future bets
Posted by Meaux Bettah
Tiger Nation
Member since Nov 2011
2591 posts
Posted on 2/2/12 at 8:19 pm to
Jacob Hester.
Posted by Jaketigger
Baton Rouge Area
Member since Feb 2008
5064 posts
Posted on 2/2/12 at 9:38 pm to
actually it proved out since most of 2009 played last year for LSU. Next year would have been monster if they had stayed. If all holds true Bama will win it again for the next 5 years or so.
Posted by 2007lsuno1
Marietta, GA
Member since Aug 2009
6692 posts
Posted on 2/3/12 at 6:32 am to
quote:

Posted byMessage
TigerWoody
How much are rankings worth


bitches gotta bitch


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram