Started By
Message

re: How different are things today if LSU signs Prescott instead of Rivers?

Posted on 11/23/15 at 11:40 pm to
Posted by TigerLink
Franklin
Member since Mar 2004
112 posts
Posted on 11/23/15 at 11:40 pm to
None! Miles would still be coach.
Posted by TigerOnThe Hill
Springhill, LA
Member since Sep 2008
6811 posts
Posted on 11/23/15 at 11:40 pm to
quote:

Who made that choice? Their butt should be gone.

I agree. The most troubling part of Prescott's "recruitment" is that we entirely missed out on assessing his talent and capabilities., taking Steve Rivers instead. Maybe that's part of our problems "developing" QB's: we recruit the wrong ones. I think he was a sr the '11 season. If so, Stud was the OC then. I'm not sure whether we had a QB coach at that time. '11 would've been the season that Kragthorpe moved from a coaching position to an admin position due to his just diagnosed Parkinson's.
Posted by BillF
Monroe, LA
Member since Jan 2006
4996 posts
Posted on 11/24/15 at 12:07 am to
Mullen as aok him as a QB because he couldn't sign someone better. The gamble played off for him. please quit acting like Prescott was a guy everyone should have wanted. Mullen was the only one who risked it. It paid off for him.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram