Started By
Message
locked post

Great Thread: Why Pac-10 is Superior to the SEC

Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:18 pm
Posted by TrojanLasVegas
Las Vegas
Member since May 2009
42 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:18 pm
Posted by MightyYat
StB Garden District
Member since Jan 2009
25029 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:19 pm to
Posted by ImOldGregg
Member since Apr 2008
1692 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:20 pm to
SEC board or
Posted by LSUBCSCHAMPS11
Member since Jan 2009
2003 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:20 pm to
The Pac looks so good on paper because they only play amongst them crappy selves and the play een crappier Big 10 teams in bowl games
Posted by el tigre
your heart
Member since Sep 2003
49712 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:21 pm to
what is worse?

some LSU fans and their obsession with USC, or Pac-10 fans that waste all day attacking the SEC?

i can't muster enough care about the Pac-10 to read that thread.
Posted by el tigre
your heart
Member since Sep 2003
49712 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

bowl games


until the Pac-10 gets at least average bowl tie ins i can't even take their bowl record that seriously.
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14918 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:23 pm to
Stand up at its best. Dane Cook should be so funny.
Posted by BayouBndt
Shreveport
Member since Dec 2007
3169 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

How dominant is USC? USC has more OOC wins (8) against Top 10 teams than the entire SEC (7). USC's record is an astounding 8-2 or 80%. Given this, how can USC have only played in 1 BCS championship game this decade?


Ok out of conference but lets add out of conference and in conference top 10 teams and then see what the numbers are.
Posted by lsudiva2010
2014 Class B BBall Champions
Member since Jan 2008
19302 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:26 pm to
That was my argument last year,
Sure they went what 4-0, but they were practically done with their games before the SEC even started theirs and we won the big one not just last but the last three years
/thread
Posted by AtlBrett
Marietta, GA
Member since Sep 2008
2789 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

TrojanLasVegas


Know how I know you're gay?

Posted by genuineLSUtiger
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
77199 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

Given this, how can USC have only played in 1 BCS championship game this decade?


You play in a shitty conference full of cupcakes. People don't respect that. It's really not that hard.
Posted by ENYOMOUT
No, it's not moving.. you are.
Member since Jun 2005
5088 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:28 pm to
Even with some horrible teams on the sched. for SEC teams, they still are the best show in town. Way more top match ups than the PAC.

Tulane could be three of the teams in the PAC Tin. USC has it easy, no amount of spin can change that. Plus, the PAC refuses to step up with a CCG.
Posted by craignettles
Member since Jan 2005
3301 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:28 pm to
His argument sounds good. I have not run the numbers, but if his are accurate, then what is the error? Besides: "It is B.S." or "on paper"

If the Sec is better one through 12, why doesn't it show up in the numbers? Again, that is assuming his numbers are accurate. Sounds like the guy had not much to do with his time.
Posted by Leauxgan
Brooklyn
Member since Nov 2005
17324 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

AtlBrett



so unnecessary and cliche to the point of idiocy

I'm embarrassed that you even exist
Posted by Oily Tigah
City of Surup
Member since May 2007
2373 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

Why Pac-10 is Superior to the SEC


Didn't make it past the title.

/thread
Posted by Geaux9
Mandeville
Member since Apr 2009
5173 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:33 pm to
Posted by jacksimmons2000
Savannah, GA
Member since Nov 2006
778 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:36 pm to
These pics are killing me. Damn.

All these arguments are fairly silly. You can't really compare teams that haven't played. It is identical to the geezer saying that the 1789 Yankees were better than the 2007 Dodgers. OK dude.

But I think that it is generally accepted that the SEC has been more consistently tough over the past 20 years. That doesn't mean that every SEC team is better, or that USC sucks...it just reflects the fact that the middle tier SEC teams tend to be tougher than the middle tier in the other conferences.

Plus, the SEC has never participated in a BCS championship game and lost, so the argument that getting out of the SEC makes you the best in the country has yet to be disproved.
Posted by MaroonIntruder
Columbia,SC
Member since Apr 2009
416 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:37 pm to
This is funny for many reasons. First being that it starts..."Great Read". My arse great read. Like reading a cell phone bill.

Do we really need to analyze why the PAC-10 sucks.

Please give USC, LSU's schedule for next season and see how they do and we'll go play in the PAC-10/ automatic Rose Bowl.
Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26721 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:37 pm to
Why should this be banned? It should be moved to a different board, but the SEC isn't head and shoulders above the Pac-10 every year.
Posted by winner
New Orleans,LA
Member since Jan 2007
2432 posts
Posted on 8/11/09 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

Plus, the SEC has never participated in a BCS championship game and lost, so the argument that getting out of the SEC makes you the best in the country has yet to be disproved.

fun fact. hope you didn't put the hex on this one
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram