- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:23 pm to AuburnCPA
Dude he wasn't comparing cam to pp...he was comparing pp to all other db's. He was saying that he's getting mad respect cause he's the best at his position and a game changer whether or not he has the ball. The only reason cam was mentioned was in reference to the hype given to both players for being at the top of their respective positions and saying you should be able to understand such hype
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:23 pm to JermStone
PP is bad arse no doubt....
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:23 pm to AuburnCPA
quote:
one difference between Cam and PP. Cam touches the ball every play. PP does not. You have to have to ball to score.
This was not with reference to PP being on the offense. This was with reference to Cam completing his 75% of his passes.
I was trying to show that with PP and Mo/TRex , that this would not be possible. When the WRs are not available , either incompletions or INTs happen.
Therefore Cam chooses not to throw and takes off - but because of the faith in the CBs to take care of the passing game, that really narrows down the rushing game and allows the rest of the D to concentrate on it.
BTW PP will get the ball on every Kickoff and Punt and there is a reason he is one of the few D/ST players on the Heisman watch.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:25 pm to SouthOfSouth
quote:
The only problem with man coverage is you can run defenders off and leave wide open running lanes for Cam if he gets past the D line
Well, if the front seven cannot, in general, neutralize Mr. Newton, LSU will not likely win this game...
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:26 pm to AuburnCPA
quote:
You have to have to ball to score.
What the...no way!
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:27 pm to AuburnCPA
quote:
all I gotta say is We beat a Chavis Defense with Kodi Burns at QB.
All I gotta say is, we beat a Chizik defense with Gary Crowton and Jordan Jefferson
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:29 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
All I gotta say is, we beat a Chizik defense with Gary Crowton and Jordan Jefferson
BOOOOOM!
kidding....I just wanted to say that
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:29 pm to AuburnCPA
quote:
all I gotta say is We beat a Chavis Defense with Kodi Burns at QB.
Whens the last time you beat an LSU defense???
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:30 pm to AuburnCPA
quote:
all I gotta say is We beat a Chavis Defense with Kodi Burns at QB.
Is that the best you got? A logical non-sequitur!
Lets all play that stupid game instead - let me go first - LSU Vs Au three seasons 3-0 (with pick6 lee and sack-me JJ)
If you are having a serious discussion don't throw this crap around, it derails the thread and marginalizes your future posts.
This post was edited on 10/22/10 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:31 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
All I gotta say is, we beat a Chizik defense with Gary Crowton and Jordan Jefferson
Sir, you receive a
for that post.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:33 pm to White Tiger
quote:
The only problem with man coverage is you can run defenders off and leave wide open running lanes for Cam if he gets past the D line
If our Dline doesnt get pressure were pretty fricked anyway though....
This post was edited on 10/22/10 at 1:34 pm
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:38 pm to AuburnCPA
Do you seriously think those last few defenses Chavis had a UT had anywhere NEAR the talent level of LSU's this year? Please. Those groups lived on good coaching and Eric Berry. You'd have to go back to the late 90s to see an example of Chavis coaching this much talent. Those were some pretty good defenses in case you don't recall.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:38 pm to CalTiger
Beam me up Captain Nerd..........."non-sequitur" this is an SEC football discussion you f@@king Lit major.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:38 pm to WelcomeToDeathValley
You are pretty F'd regardless....you will know that in 30 hours.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:42 pm to AUBfanatic
quote:
Beam me up Captain Nerd..........."non-sequitur" this is an SEC football discussion you f@@king Lit major.
That is part of Logic 101 courses in most good schools you fricking back-asswards-trailor-trash - not surprised that you confused it with fricking Literature, considering your background (or rather lack of it in logic, english or in football)
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:42 pm to AUBfanatic
quote:
Beam me up Captain Nerd..........."non-sequitur" this is an SEC football discussion you f@@king Lit major.
You registered just to post that garbage? That's a pretty common phrase, Cletus.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:43 pm to jwtiger
quote:
You are pretty F'd regardless....you will know that in 30 hours.
meh... LSU 31 AU 27 is no reason to feel fricked over, just because we couldn't beat you by 2 TDS.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:47 pm to Camp Randall
quote:
You registered just to post that garbage? That's a pretty common phrase, Cletus.
Didn't notice , till you pointed it out, that it was from a newly registered Alter. I assumed that it was CPA or the other Camburn Eagle.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:47 pm to Camp Randall
LOL! I realize that...a co-worker wanted me to post that.
I route for Auburn but lived in Baton Rouge most of my life and this game is difficult for me every year.
I hope Auburn wins but if not you guys are the last hope to bring down 'the team that will go un-named'
I route for Auburn but lived in Baton Rouge most of my life and this game is difficult for me every year.
I hope Auburn wins but if not you guys are the last hope to bring down 'the team that will go un-named'
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News