- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did JJ look faster?
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:53 am to CptBengal
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:53 am to CptBengal
quote:
JJ >>>>>> LSU Football >>>>>> LSU
That's what it all boils down to. Most are family/friends as you said...and they couldn't care less of the well-being of LSU, they are just concerned about the well-being of JJ. Incidentally, that is exactly the way JJ has always came across at LSU. It is borderline comical to hear all the posters on here talking about how much bigger, faster, stronger, quicker, smarter, etc...after watching 3 plays against a bad team that was already beaten down. It really is comical. Then you call them out on it and they go wild. I specifically love Just Me......(which I definitely believe to be JJ or someone in the family)...he is ALL-IN JJ....keeps talking about the great finish he had....without keeping in mind playing two horrible passing defenses in ole miss and a&m. Heck, JJ was bad at arkansas...and ULM, during that stretch.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:55 am to TigerWoody
quote:
You are a fricking retard if that's what you get out of this thread.
Oh..I see. So three running plays against a bad team that was already run down, and we hear how much faster, stronger, etc......but in the end, he couldn't finish the drive.....which is the norm with him for about 90% of the time. You guys just don't want to see or admit that.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:55 am to CantonTiger128
quote:
but in the end, he couldn't finish the drive.....which is the norm with him for about 90% of the time.
OK. I concede. frick it. We only need JLee.
This post was edited on 10/6/11 at 9:56 am
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:57 am to TigerWoody
quote:
Wow.
disagree? didn't they have to bring in JL on third and long on the drive? Just curious? you laugh at this while it was the same crap we saw last year. The 100th ranked qb in passing efficiency who can run a little...leads to a bad offense that scores approximately 2 tds less a game than we have now. Debate that!
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:57 am to CantonTiger128
quote:
and they couldn't care less of the well-being of LSU, they are just concerned about the well-being of JJ. Incidentally
Or we care more about LSU rather than the player. I for one feel LSU has improved as a team with JJ back. As do many others that know something about football.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:58 am to CantonTiger128
quote:
Debate that!
We need both. Get over it.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:58 am to Topwater Trout
quote:
Or we care more about LSU rather than the player. I for one feel LSU has improved as a team with JJ back. As do many others that know something about football.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:58 am to CantonTiger128
quote:
CantonTiger128
You continue to post the stupidest shite. You are easily in the top 5 of worst/dumbest posters.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:59 am to Rudy40
quote:
Not me but Canton does have his facts straight
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:00 am to CantonTiger128
quote:
Oh..I see. So three running plays against a bad team that was already run down, and we hear how much faster, stronger, etc......but in the end, he couldn't finish the drive.....which is the norm with him for about 90% of the time. You guys just don't want to see or admit that.
Objective posting; You should try it.
Take off the blinders. Did anyone in this thread say JJ should be starting? Anyone? How about a quote? Can you Quote anyone in this thread saying this? Did anyone even mention JJ vs JL until you came along?
Are you so upset with JJ that you can't admit he is in better shape than ever before in his LSU career?
Or are you just such a poor observer of football that you couldn't tell the difference?
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:01 am to CantonTiger128
quote:Let me interpret for you: "Wow!" is a simple way of saying, that BS that you just typed is so fricked up, these 3 letters and a punctuation mark is about all the effort I will give in response...your rant -- it's worthless tripe.
Wow.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:03 am to CptBengal
quote:
Forget about the team ,overall success or anything else. For those that posted heavily in this thread it's
It is about the team. Your hate has made you blind to what is right in front of you.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:03 am to Topwater Trout
quote:
Or we care more about LSU rather than the player. I for one feel LSU has improved as a team with JJ back. As do many others that know something about football.
I care more for the team. That is why we need a QB not ranked at the bottom of the league in passer rating. Why do you think our O is clicking so much better this year. You do realize we are averaging 160 yards a game through 5 games, compared to 90 through 5 games last year by JJ. I played college ball. In addition, I think many of the analyst that are out there (herbsteit) are saying the same thing...don't mess with a good thing. JJ would be okay around the goal line (I guess), but then again look at the difference in red zone efficiency. Incidentally, isn't it amazing that the same JJ pumpers are saying we can't run the ball as well without JJ, but doesn't that lead to more reason to appreciate the job JL is doing at QB, given that the offense is averaging 2 more td's a game so far...
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:03 am to BigEdLSU
quote:
Objective posting; You should try it.
back at you and everyone else in this thread.
First to claim JL isn't that good, his numbers are against weak defenses, no difference between this years offense and last years, etc, etc, etc.
Let JJ run the ball three times and it's 6 pages **gushing** about his greatness.
Yall are so transparent it's actually funny. even more entertaining when you claim "objectivity".
Should JJ be on the team, sure. Should he play, who knows...but we haven't needed his skills yet.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:03 am to BigEdLSU
quote:That will keep him busy for a while.
Did anyone in this thread say JJ should be starting? Anyone? How about a quote? Can you Quote anyone in this thread saying this? Did anyone even mention JJ vs JL until you came along?
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:04 am to CantonTiger128
quote:
Most are family/friends as you said
You two homos keep saying this tired, pathetic cliche`. I've never met him. Try coming up with something of substance, you child.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:04 am to CantonTiger128
quote:
and they couldn't care less of the well-being of LSU, they are just concerned about the well-being of JJ.
LSU was a better team for having both JJ/JL last season and LSU is/will be a better team for having JL/JJ this season.
Anyone not able to note/deal with that fact shouldn't be talking bout how "comical" others appear to them.imo
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:04 am to Topwater Trout
quote:
we care more about LSU rather than the player
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:04 am to junkfunky
quote:
It is about the team. Your hate has made you blind to what is right in front of you.
right in front of us:
100th out of 116 in passer rating and efficiency last year.
Scoring 14 more points a game this year compared to last year.
top 20 in the nation in scoring this year, ranked #80 last year through 5 games.
Red zone in the tops of the nation through 5 games, last year near the bottom of the nation.
Those are staring us in the face.
Popular
Back to top


5


