- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breaking News: Jefferson threw 4 TDs and 9 INTs w/ 8 fumbles last regular season
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:12 pm to TruLsu
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:12 pm to TruLsu
quote:
Yeah we'll be more one-dimensional with Lee. Yay.
yea this makes perfect sense
I realize it seems counter, but it actually makes sense. I've never been overly impressed with Lee's passing ability. He shows signs, but he has been given chances and I'm left equally unimpressed. The only thing that ever fully set the two players apart IMO was JJ's ability to run the football. He's improved in that facet. Now, hopefully Lee can prove to be a better passer and we're not one-dimensional. But we're a very vanilla offense with Lee and it isn't going to be too difficult to scheme against him. His inability to get out of the pocket, in a strange way, makes us more of a I-formation team, which I think is a problem.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:12 pm to Maximus
quote:
only one person got beat up? Thats news to me. But the others are probably child molestors right, Chockie?
no...but your little buddy started it. and if you're friends with a douchebag it probably means you're a douchebag too.
quote:
Les's boys could never do no wrong just like Les!!!
this has to do with LSU...not Les Miles
btw...i think we'll be just as good if not better with Lee. The only issue is his lack of running ability
This post was edited on 8/27/11 at 4:14 pm
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:13 pm to Maximus
quote:
4 TDs 9 INts 8 fumbles and you're in here arguing to the death over how we're all gonna die now without him. I'm just trying to help you realize that life may actually go on without Michael Henig Version 2.0.
Where did I say that it was the death of us? frick, no wonder you suck as a poster you can't read for shite. I simply said that we'll lose something without having a guy that can run, because at the end of the day Lee isn't exactly showing me he can light the world on fire passing the ball.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:15 pm to Maximus
quote:fact
Breaking News: Maxi is still a douche.
This post was edited on 8/27/11 at 4:16 pm
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:15 pm to LSUtoOmaha
quote:
Peyton Manning may be the worst running quarterback I've ever seen. The Colts are so one-dimensional!!!
Did u really just bring Peyton Fricking Manning into this thread gtfoh!
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:16 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:do you realize how much better we are at that one dimension? we don't need JJ running when we have a QB who can complete a pass longer than 7 yards.
Yeah we'll be more one-dimensional with Lee. Yay.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:16 pm to Tiger Authority
Wait so you're saying lee and JJ are a wash when it comes to throwing to ball? You've got to be kidding me.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:17 pm to 5Alive
quote:
Did u really just bring Peyton Fricking Manning into this thread gtfoh!
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:18 pm to Acreboy
quote:
Yeah we'll be more one-dimensional with Lee. Yay.
do you realize how much better we are at that one dimension? we don't need JJ running when we have a QB who can complete a pass longer than 7 yards.
This is my problem. Neither JJ nor Lee are consistent passing the football. Both show flashes, but never consistency. So it's not the fact that he's a pocket passer that bothers me as much as the fact that he's an erratic, inconsistent pocket passer. If he can change that, we'll be fine and we don't be one-dimensional. But if he continues to be erratic, losing a running quarterback will only make us worse offensive, despite what the overall numbers may say yardage wise.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:18 pm to Maximus
max, update your title line with the 9 fumbles stat
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:18 pm to TruLsu
Sorry but losing your starting QB who you invested a ton of time in never really helps at all.
That said I think Lee can take us to Atlanta!
That said I think Lee can take us to Atlanta!
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:19 pm to TruLsu
quote:
Wait so you're saying lee and JJ are a wash when it comes to throwing to ball? You've got to be kidding me.
I'm saying both are inconsistent to the point that I don't have confidence in either throwing the ball, but at least one could run somewhat effectively at times.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:20 pm to Maximus
b...b...but he has improved so much during the spring and the summer! he's even in Heisman contention! *sarcasm*
for the first time ever, and probably the only time, I agree with you.
for the first time ever, and probably the only time, I agree with you.
This post was edited on 8/27/11 at 4:20 pm
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:20 pm to Tiger Authority
As someone posted earlier. Even in his worst year, Lee and the Tigers had 20 TO's in 2008. LSU had 24 last season in the same number of games. The difference was the defenses LSU had.
JJ had 10 INTs and 8 fumbles last season with the coaches calling the game every way they could to minimize them. In 2008 Lee had 16 INTs with the offense being completely open and Crwoton acting like Lee was a 5th year senior.
Just because Lee as a Freshman had 16 turnovers, doesn't mean JJ as a JR and 2nd year full time starter having 18 was somehow better for the offense.
Furthermore, the offense will change to fit the QB. That is what we hope the coaches would do, but most of you JJ nuthuggers and Lee haters have simply just said, "He was a failure, and even though he improved, he's still crap and we are doomed".
JJ had 10 INTs and 8 fumbles last season with the coaches calling the game every way they could to minimize them. In 2008 Lee had 16 INTs with the offense being completely open and Crwoton acting like Lee was a 5th year senior.
Just because Lee as a Freshman had 16 turnovers, doesn't mean JJ as a JR and 2nd year full time starter having 18 was somehow better for the offense.
Furthermore, the offense will change to fit the QB. That is what we hope the coaches would do, but most of you JJ nuthuggers and Lee haters have simply just said, "He was a failure, and even though he improved, he's still crap and we are doomed".
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:21 pm to Choctaw
quote:
and if you're friends with a douchebag it probably means you're a douchebag too
what does it mean if you are a huge fan of a retard?
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:21 pm to Maximus
No - we are losing our Miles chosen leader who was going to have a Jason Campbell Senior season.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:21 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
His inability to get out of the pocket, in a strange way, makes us more of a I-formation team, which I think is a problem.
we'll still spread the field with Lee in the game, but I think we were on our way to being more of an I-form team anyway.
oh, and I like that Lee brings better short passing ability. he should get the ball out to the playmakers accurately in space and let em do something with it.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:22 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:so improving the yardage per game on offense can be a bad thing because we don't have a running qb?
But if he continues to be erratic, losing a running quarterback will only make us worse offensive, despite what the overall numbers may say yardage wise.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:22 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
Where did I say that it was the death of us? frick, no wonder you suck as a poster you can't read for shite. I simply said that we'll lose something without having a guy that can run, because at the end of the day Lee isn't exactly showing me he can light the world on fire passing the ball.
So how many more games do you see us losing without the awesome rushing threat of JJ?
Posted on 8/27/11 at 4:22 pm to Maximus
quote:
what does it mean if you are a huge fan of a retard?
not sure. don't know any
Popular
Back to top


3





