- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Besides the cheating, what really bugs me about the PP call
Posted on 11/14/09 at 4:32 pm to Charles Bronson
Posted on 11/14/09 at 4:32 pm to Charles Bronson
Only thing I will add is that I was sitting 15 rows from the field. The official announces in the stadium that the ruling on the field is... An official review. They didn't announce to the stadium that it was ruled as incomplete or int. What I gathered was that it was too close for them to tell so they did not make a ruling on the field and that the desicion would be based soley on the replay.
2
Posted on 11/14/09 at 4:36 pm to DaBeerz
On TV they said it was incomplete, which is correct. The default call in that situation is incomplete.
I want to see this sideline view from CST. That's the decisive angle that CBS didn't provide.
I want to see this sideline view from CST. That's the decisive angle that CBS didn't provide.
This post was edited on 11/14/09 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 11/14/09 at 4:37 pm to Charles Bronson
Well of course they didn't show the replay in the stadium and didn't announce a ruling on the field. So we really had no idea.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 4:43 pm to XbengalTiger
quote:
So tell me, in a hands catch that is not bobbled or double caught, when is possession established?
There is no "hands catch" in the rule book....
Look it up.Posted on 11/14/09 at 4:54 pm to DaBeerz
quote:
Only thing I will add is that I was sitting 15 rows from the field. The official announces in the stadium that the ruling on the field is... An official review. They didn't announce to the stadium that it was ruled as incomplete or int. What I gathered was that it was too close for them to tell so they did not make a ruling on the field and that the desicion would be based soley on the replay.
With all the players surrounding the SJ and HL you might have missed the SJ rule incomplete.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 5:12 pm to arrakis
quote:Wow, the lack of football knowledge is amazing. It's all about control and if you catch the ball in your hands and don't bobble or double catch it, you have control as soon as it is in your hands. If you catch the ball against your body, the ball tends to move around and you dont have control until you tuck it with a football move.
There is no "hands catch" in the rule book..
Posted on 11/14/09 at 5:14 pm to XbengalTiger
Why don't you quit spewing BS and actually quote the rulebook?
Posted on 11/14/09 at 5:17 pm to XbengalTiger
quote:
Wow, the lack of football knowledge is amazing.
It is....YOURS.
quote:
It's all about control and if you catch the ball in your hands and don't bobble or double catch it, you have control as soon as it is in your hands.
By that standard a split second later, should he drop the ball, it's a fumble. Take a step back and think about what you are saying.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 5:36 pm to arrakis
The SJ may have ruled it incomplete but it was obvious to anyone watching the game they didn't know what to call on the play. The SJ was blocked from seeing the catch by the players and had the brook trout look when asking the other ref for help and the other ref obviously didn't know what happened or they would not have talked about it for so long before calling it incomplete and sending it to the booth. If either one of them saw it as incomplete they would have called it immediately instead of talking about it for so long. It was pretty obvious that they missed the play and had no choice but to call it incomplete on the field thinking that the booth would be able to get it right after review. The problem was that the booth used the call on the field as a way to justify a bad call.
Posted on 11/15/09 at 10:23 am to Geauxtiga
Thats the KEY
Posted on 11/15/09 at 12:26 pm to XbengalTiger
I haven't logged on here since last week and can't believe you guys are still talking about this. Few stats for ya...
Team Stat Comparison
1st Downs LSU-13 Bama-24
Total Yards LSU-253 Bama-452
Passing LSU-158 Bama-276
Yards per pass
LSU-5.9 Bama-8.1
Rushing LSU-95 Bama-176
Yards per rush
LSU-3.3 Bama-4.6
Penalties LSU-8-43 Bama-4-20
Possession LSU-27:08 Bama-32:52
And the most important one of all...
Bama---24
LSU----15
Roll Tide!!!
Team Stat Comparison
1st Downs LSU-13 Bama-24
Total Yards LSU-253 Bama-452
Passing LSU-158 Bama-276
Yards per pass
LSU-5.9 Bama-8.1
Rushing LSU-95 Bama-176
Yards per rush
LSU-3.3 Bama-4.6
Penalties LSU-8-43 Bama-4-20
Possession LSU-27:08 Bama-32:52
And the most important one of all...
Bama---24
LSU----15
Roll Tide!!!
Posted on 11/15/09 at 12:30 pm to Rex
quote:
Miles's statement that he was "satisfied" was not only chickenshit but stupid. WHY should he be satisfied with a process that delivered an obviously incorrect ruling?
If you are making four million dollars a year, and your excutive board of advisors explains the hard facts of life, what would you say to them?
Don't tell me, let me guess; "take this job and shove it".
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News