re: ATTENTION ALL TIGER FANS!!!!! LSU Will Suffer...

quote:

---

So the offense regressed statistically.. but improved in overall rank -- that is not impressive. That means it has more to do with the other teams in the conference.

Your argument sucks, plain and simple.

---

The delusional guy who hasn't been able to make one coherent point regarding Crowton is his 15 or so post trashing Crowton. Look, being an honest person might mean nothing to you, but it sure makes you look like lesser of a human being.

This is how Oregon has done from 2000 to 2006. Guess which two years Crowton was there as OC? Hint: they are in bold below. Do you really think an Oregon fan would be complaing about the best OC they had in years?

OREGON TOTAL OFFENSE
2000 -- #34
2001 -- #22
2002 -- #60
2003 -- #57
2004 -- #37
2005 -- #18
2006 -- #9 -- #1 in Pac 10, even better than 2006 USC

quote:

---

The delusional guy who hasn't been able to make one coherent point regarding Crowton is his 15 or so post trashing Crowton. Look, being an honest person might mean nothing to you, but it sure makes you look like lesser of a human being.

This is how Oregon has done from 2000 to 2006. Guess which two years Crowton was there as OC? Hint: they are in bold below. Do you really think an Oregon fan would be complaing about the best OC they had in years?

OREGON TOTAL OFFENSE
2000 -- #34
2001 -- #22
2002 -- #60
2003 -- #57
2004 -- #37
2005 -- #18
2006 -- #9 -- #1 in Pac 10, even better than 2006 USC

---

The stupidity.. it burns.. Look champ, the RANK of the offense is not what is important. We are talking statistics, not comparing Oregon to the REST OF COLLEGE FOOTBALL. Total offense is for comparing Team X to Team Y. We are comparing Team X to Team X.. why is that so hard to understand?

The offense regressed statistically. Bottom line. That is why your argument is bad. You're obviously an idiot, I don't know why we waste our time.

2006: 423.2 yards per game/29.5 PPG
2005: 438.8 yards per game/34.5

quote:

---

The stupidity.. it burns.. Look champ, the RANK of the offense is not what is important. We are talking statistics, not comparing Oregon to the REST OF COLLEGE FOOTBALL. Total offense is for comparing Team X to Team Y. We are comparing Team X to Team X.. why is that so hard to understand?

The offense regressed statistically. Bottom line. That is why your argument is bad.

---

Your offense finishes #9 in the NCAA and #1 in the Pac-10, even better than USC, you aren't going to be complaining about your OC. Quit being stupid.

quote:

---

Just wait till Gary has to develop his own QB, you LSU fans will forget that national championship faster than you can say “3 years of rebuilding”

---

THIS

quote:

---

Your offense finishes #9 in the NCAA and #1 in the Pac-10, even better than USC, you aren't going to be complaining about your OC. Quit being stupid.

---

And it was not as good an offense as it was the year before. That's the entire argument. What part of that do you not get?

quote:

---

Dont sweat it pal, he has almost 1000 posts in less than 2 weeks. we know whats going on here..

---

I hope that's what it is.. nobody can be this dense

Its a proven statistic that 5/4ths of the population can't do fractions.

2007
#1 ranked Total Offense
Tulsa 543.93 ypg 10-4 (W-L)
#1 ranked Scoring Offense
Hawaii 43.38 ppg 12-1 (W-L)

Oregon 2007 Record: 9-4 (W-L)
Total Offense
10th ranked: 467.54 ypg
Scoring Offense
12th ranked: 38.15 ppg

2007 MNC LSU Record: 12-2 (W-L)
Total Offense
26th ranked: 439.43 ypg
Scoring Offense
11th ranked: 38.64 ppg

2008
#1 ranked Total Offense
Tulsa 569.86 ypg 11-3 (W-L)
#1 ranked Scoring Offense
Oklahoma 51.14 ppg 12-2 (W-L)

Oregon 2008 Record: 10-3 (W-L)
Total Offense
7th ranked: 484.85 ypg
Scoring Offense
15th ranked: 41.92 ppg

2008 MNC Florida Record: 13-1 (W-L)
Total Offense
15th ranked Florida 445.07 ypg 13-1
Scoring Offense
3rd ranked Florida 43.64 ppg

I include the top ranked and MNC offenses for comparison.

Oregon before Crowton as OC
2004 5-6 (W-L)
37th ranked 397.00 ypg
55th ranked 25.64 ppg

Oregon with Crowton as OC
2005 10-1 (W-L)
18th ranked: 438.83 ypg
12th ranked: 37.64 ppg

2006 7-6 (W-L)
9th ranked: 422.85 ypg
25th ranked: 29.46 ppg

Oregon With Chip Kelly as OC
2007 9-4 (W-L)
10th ranked: 467.54 ypg
12th ranked: 38.15 ppg

2008 10-3 (W-L)
7th ranked: 484.85 ypg
15th ranked: 41.92 ppg

Posting the same bullshite over and over doesn't change the numbers. Under Crowton, the offense got worse in year 2. Under Kelly, they improved their ypg and ppg in successive seasons.

Edit: Oregon's W-L records also went down w/ Crowton as OC, while Kelly improved it and has kept it steady. Oregon is currently 5-1.

quote:

---

#9 in the NCAA is better than #18

---

Prove that the 2006 offense was better than the 2005 offense without using any type of ranking system. That means by using points per game, yards per game, rushing yards per game, passing yards per game.

Prediction: Can't and won't

quote:

---

Prove that the 2006 offense was better than the 2005 offense without using any type of ranking system. That means by using points per game, yards per game, rushing yards per game, passing yards per game.

Prediction: Can't and won't

---

Crowton finishes up at Oregon with the #9 offense in the NCAA and the #1 offense in the Pac 10 (even better than USC), and that is "failure" to you. That is "suffering" to you?

quote:

---

Also, how do you explain that exactly what he said has happened?

---

The guy claimed Oregon fans "suffered" while Crowton was there. Crowton finished #9 in the NCAA and #1 in the Pac 10 at Oregon. Is that "suffering" to you?

I wish Crowton was doing that good right now at LSU. But he's not. Right now, LSU is #109 in the NCAA and dead last in the SEC.