Started By
Message

re: All we need is good QB play right?

Posted on 7/12/15 at 4:26 pm to
Posted by southeasttiger113
Member since Aug 2011
2046 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Tell that to
TENN 2011 73 YARDS 1 TD
ARK 2011 58 YARDS 1TD
Tenn 2010 100 yards 1td
Auburn 2010 76 yards 1td
Tex A&M 70 yards 1td
He rushed for 100 yards once in 2 years. Nick Marshall rushed for 100 yards 5 times last year alone. Do you not understand why I'm not categorizing him as a game changing rushing threat or....?
Posted by chilge1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
12139 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

I just said that the game plan didn't change much from Jefferson to Lee considering that they both stood in the pocket and threw the ball. Jefferson wasn't such an upgrade with his feet that he completely changed the way that defensive coordinators had to prepare for him


Tell it to Nick Saban who made Lee piss his pants and who lost to Jefferson. Why was Jefferson able to be more effective if they had such similar styles of play?
Posted by timm6971463
oakdale la
Member since Mar 2008
4387 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 4:30 pm to
I would insult you power man than any insult I could think of would actually be a compliment to you
Posted by southeasttiger113
Member since Aug 2011
2046 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

Redshirt Junior = Senior. You clearly don't know anything about eligibility.
Wow. Yea, sitting on the bench and never being able to participate in a game is exactly the same as getting valuable playing time and experience your freshman year
quote:

Jamie Howard is the last QB to start before Jefferson and was a 4 year starter with 200 more passing attempts than Jefferson.

Before him was Steve Ensminger in 1976 who came nowhere near Jefferson's numbers.

It would take someone more versed in LSU history than I to go back farther than 40 years.

So basically not that many QB's have had all 4 years to accumulate stats for the record books? Without you starting another retarded debate about this, let's just put that argument from ya'll about Jefferson's greatness to bed
Posted by southeasttiger113
Member since Aug 2011
2046 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Why was Jefferson able to be more effective if they had such similar styles of play?
You and I have very different definitions of the word "effective". Scoring zero touchdowns in 2 games isn't what I'd call "more effective". Maybe "slightly less awful", but Jefferson, Alabama, and the word "effective" don't belong anywhere near the same sentence. The fact that you're turning Jefferson into the Bama hero is such a fricking joke are you related to him? Serious question
Posted by chilge1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
12139 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 4:41 pm to
Jefferson saw legitimate playing time in 3 games in '08 and 6 in '11.

Treating him like he started every game for four years is dishonest.

Zach Mettenberger started for two (minus a bowl game) and nearly surpassed him in pass attempts.
Posted by chilge1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
12139 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

You and I have very different definitions of the word "effective". 


Way to avoid the question...

To answer you, 3/7 for 24 yards and 2 INTs with no scoring drives is not effective.
Posted by southeasttiger113
Member since Aug 2011
2046 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

Jefferson saw legitimate playing time in 3 games in '08 and 6 in '11.

Treating him like he started every game for four years is dishonest.
Ok I was never saying that he started for 4 years but the fact that he was able to get his feet wet his freshman year while Lee was thrown to the wolves was a huge advantage for him. Mett, Russell, and a lot of other guys didn't have the luxury of being eased into starting.
quote:

Zach Mettenberger started for two (minus a bowl game) and nearly surpassed him in pass attempts.
And Mettenberger had over 1000 more passing yards than him. Face it, we've had very few QB's at LSU that have been as bad as Jordan Jefferson n the last 40 years. He had an awesome supporting cast and an awesome defense to help him out and he was still as bad as any quarterback that we've had in our lifetimes aside from Jennings
Posted by southeasttiger113
Member since Aug 2011
2046 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

To answer you, 3/7 for 24 yards and 2 INTs with no scoring drives is not effective.
And neither was Jefferson. What's your point? You're comparing a terrible QB to another terrible QB
Posted by chilge1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
12139 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

the fact that he was able to get his feet wet his freshman year while Lee was thrown to the wolves was a huge advantage for him. Mett, Russell, and a lot of other guys didn't have the luxury of being eased into starting.


For the love of God, please Google 'redshirt.'

quote:

He had an awesome supporting cast 


I'd like you to name the ones that were drafted, paying close attention to the offensive line.
Posted by chilge1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
12139 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

Why was Jefferson able to be more effective if they had such similar styles of play?


Jefferson was effective enough to win the game. 2-2 against Alabama as a starter during a time where they won two NCs and played in the Sugar Bowl.
This post was edited on 7/12/15 at 5:02 pm
Posted by southeasttiger113
Member since Aug 2011
2046 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

For the love of God, please Google 'redshirt.'
Ok let's just clear this up, what exactly do you think I'm not understanding?
Posted by chilge1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
12139 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 5:05 pm to
There's 18 pages of ignorance in this thread on your part. This is just one topic.
Posted by southeasttiger113
Member since Aug 2011
2046 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

Jefferson was effective enough to win the game. 2-2 against Alabama as a starter during a time where they won two NCs and played in the Sugar Bowl.
I really, really, really don't care how you spin it considering that we didn't even score a touchdown in one of those wins. If you think that a QB who threw for 67, 50, and 30 yards in 3/6 of the games that he started as a senior wasn't terrible then I'm not sure what to tell you.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
47984 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

just said that the game plan didn't change much from Jefferson to Lee considering that they both stood in the pocket and threw the ball. 


Holy shite. Do you even watch the games?

quote:

'm not joking when I say that you have the lowest IQ of anyone that I've ever had a conversation with.


Wow. My degree from Duke would beg to differ boy. You can't even remember the ignorant arguments you make.

quote:

I'm not saying that he isn't but the reason that we're even discussing this is that you and your idiot friend are claiming that JJ is the main reason that our running backs had so many yards in november. 


Neither one of us said anything about MAIN REASON. We are trying to educate you on football. If you have a qb that can run the ball, it's helps your rbs because the defense can not sell out and crash down on you. This is common knowledge for people that understand football. At no point did anyone say JJ was THE MAIN REASON. This is why we are calling you a fricking retard. You take what we post and add an extreme to it. For example, I said JJ was a running threat and you turned it into I was making JJ out to be Tim Tebow.
You are the dumbest person I've talked to in at least 2 weeks. You don't understand football at the routemantary level. You have been proven wrong time and time again in the thread with facts and stats and I'm sure in your 64 iq brain, you think you're winning the argument when in reality you've proven you don't know shite about the history of the team you pull for nor do you understand what you're seeing when you watch a football game.
Just conversing with you in this thread has made my iq drop below it's 136 level that it was before dealing with you.


I'll try one last time to let you know facts.
1. JJ is top 6 in every major passing statistic in lsu history. A history of being a top 15 alltime program.
2. JJ was more of a running threat than Herb Tyler because he has a higher yards per carry and is the lsu record holder for a rushing qb.
3. JJ was a far bigger threat to run than JLee. That's why our entire game plan switched once JJ started to run the option. On 11/5.
4. Our November schedule was by far our hardest month of competition. Playing 2 top 3 teams.
5. JJ didn't just pad his stats against weak Nov. Teams. He accounted for 52 % of our entire offensive output against #3 arky and he accounted for 49 % of our entire offensive output against #2 Bama.
6. Herb Tyler never once played behind a God awful line. In fact he played behind some of the best olinemen to ever wear purple and gold.
7. Herb Tyler never played on a shite team. We had back to back top 15 finishes in 96&97.
8. There was not a substantial difference in our offense once JJ became the starter. During JJ'S starts our yards per play was the highest it ever got in 2011 and that includes 2 top 3 teams.
9. There wasn't a huge drop off in passing success once JJ became the qb. The only drop off was in PASS ATTEMPTS. we know this because JLEE and JJ'S yards per pass were .4 apart.


NONE OF THE ABOVE STATEMENTS ARE MY OPINIONS. THEY ARE FACTS BACKED UP BY STATS FACTS BACKED UP BY STATS ARE SUPERIOR, IN EVERY WAY, TO THE EYEBALL TEST.OF SOMEONE THAT IS A CONFIRMED FOOTBALL IDIOT.
This post was edited on 7/12/15 at 5:10 pm
Posted by chilge1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
12139 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

If you think that a QB who threw for 67, 50, and 30 yards in 3/6 of the games that he started as a senior


As a mobile QB on a run-based team against Top 4 passing defenses, who went 2-1 in said games.
Posted by southeasttiger113
Member since Aug 2011
2046 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 5:09 pm to
Since I'm being so ignorant why don't you start a thread and tell all of tigerdroppings that Jefferson wasn't a bad quarterback and tell them that he's the reason that we won 2 games against Alabama in his career and see what kind of response you get. Put your money where your mouth is champ.
Posted by southeasttiger113
Member since Aug 2011
2046 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

As a mobile QB on a run-based team against Top 4 passing defenses, who went 2-1 in said games.
Start a thread and enlighten tigerdroppings that his 67, 50, and 30 yard performances were fine and they were only because of the system he played in and he was the reason that he won. Really, the majority of tigerdroppings should agree with you if you're so right and I'm so wrong
Posted by TigerBait1971
PTC GA
Member since Oct 2014
15973 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 5:12 pm to
18 pages of JJ vs. Lee diarrhea.

LOL
Posted by chilge1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
12139 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 5:12 pm to
Because I don't care for him personally and it does a disservice to every other contributor to those teams.
Jump to page
Page First 16 17 18 19 20 ... 30
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 18 of 30Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram