- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: USC recruiting so far
Posted on 8/18/09 at 11:37 pm to MJRuffalo
Posted on 8/18/09 at 11:37 pm to MJRuffalo
Florida would have arse-raped USC in 2006 and 2008. If Sam Bradford couldn't get it done, there's no way in hell Mark "Dirty" Sanchez would have.
USC might have gotten it done against LSU in 2007. LSU was defensively-challenged that year. Then again, with a loss to Stanford, I'm not convinced the Trojans had much heart that year.
USC might have gotten it done against LSU in 2007. LSU was defensively-challenged that year. Then again, with a loss to Stanford, I'm not convinced the Trojans had much heart that year.
2
Posted on 8/18/09 at 11:53 pm to HarnessedInSlums
you are clueless and just a flamer. be gone.
Posted on 8/19/09 at 12:01 am to MJRuffalo
quote:
Would have been favored in 2006, 2007, and 2008 over anyone. But that is why mnc's in college football are a punchline and not much more.
Uh.........no.
Posted on 8/19/09 at 12:02 am to MJRuffalo
quote:
If we had some sort of playoff then USC would have a few more national championships without a doubt. Would have been favored in 2006, 2007, and 2008 over anyone.
Purely hypothetical.
Means nothing.
Because being favored in the National Championship Game means nothing if you don't win.
Ask Ohio St.
Ask Oklahoma.
Ask USC.
This post was edited on 8/19/09 at 12:08 am
Posted on 8/19/09 at 12:05 am to HarnessedInSlums
quote:
LSU was defensively-challenged that year.
Only when injured. And that didn't stop us from beating your team, either.
ETA: We had the #3 defense in the country that year, btw. It was 1 OSU 2 USC 3 LSU.
Just for your info, because you seem to be confused about this matter.
This post was edited on 8/19/09 at 12:10 am
Posted on 8/19/09 at 12:10 am to MJRuffalo
quote:
Htat is just because mnc's in college football are so subjective. The 2 best teams rarely meet. If we had some sort of playoff then USC would have a few more national championships without a doubt. Would have been favored in 2006, 2007, and 2008 over anyone. But that is why mnc's in college football are a punchline and not much more.
They would have been favored over a 11-1 Florida and 12-0 Ohio State in 06' after losing their last game to UCLA and being 10-2? Were they even favored over fricking Michigan?
Posted on 8/19/09 at 12:13 am to Javzz
Yes, we were favord over Michigan. But I am talking a game after the bowls, a plus 1 scenario. Either way though. Neither LSu nor UF would likely beat USC in a bowl game those seasons. USC would at least have gone 2-1.
Posted on 8/19/09 at 12:16 am to MJRuffalo
All of the "if's" and "would have's" make my head hurt.
It's like listening to Jim Mora all over again having his annual meltdown over a loss.
Like I said before, hypotheticals mean nothing when compared to reality.
And it's usually the loser who deals in hypotheticals.
It's like listening to Jim Mora all over again having his annual meltdown over a loss.
Like I said before, hypotheticals mean nothing when compared to reality.
And it's usually the loser who deals in hypotheticals.
Posted on 8/19/09 at 12:18 am to offdacorner
It was some dumb LSu fan who brought this whole thing up in the first place. Talking about mythical titles and such.
Posted on 8/19/09 at 12:24 am to MJRuffalo
quote:
Yes, we were favord over Michigan. But I am talking a game after the bowls, a plus 1 scenario. Either way though. Neither LSu nor UF would likely beat USC in a bowl game those seasons. USC would at least have gone 2-1.
Sure, Florida just completely dismantled an undefeated Ohio State team while also having a better record. Let's throw out all logic whatsoever, USC would have been favored.
Posted on 8/19/09 at 12:27 am to MJRuffalo
We put up 38 points on the #1 defense in the country. USC had the #2.
I don't think LSU would had any trouble putting up points on USC that year.
I don't think LSU would had any trouble putting up points on USC that year.
Posted on 8/19/09 at 12:42 am to TxTiger82
Ohio st. went to the mnc game as there was nobody else. they managed there way through a very, very weak schedule. If you truly think they were better thatn USC, then there is no point in even continuing.
Posted on 8/19/09 at 1:15 am to MJRuffalo
quote:
Ohio st. went to the mnc game as there was nobody else. they managed there way through a very, very weak schedule. If you truly think they were better thatn USC, then there is no point in even continuing.
I'm not arguing who's the better team, not a fan of discussing past match-ups. All I'm saying is USC lost to two very mediocre teams and Florida had a better record and destroyed the team that was widely believed to be the best team in the nation, and thus will be favored.
It's completely pointless to discuss who would win a hypothetical playoff.
Posted on 8/19/09 at 1:20 am to TxTiger82
quote:
And that didn't stop us from beating your team, either.
Florida beat LSU up and down the field that year for three and a half quarters. In the end, the refs gave LSU the victory by adding an extra yard to a 4th down, Jacob Hester carry that was stopped short.
Without the zebras in your back pockets that year, you lose to Florida and never even sniff the title game.
That's why both of your supposed titles this decade are kind of a joke.
Posted on 8/19/09 at 1:25 am to HarnessedInSlums
I think the real question that needs to be asked is "what loser team is going to beat USC this year?"
Posted on 8/19/09 at 2:20 am to HarnessedInSlums
quote:
Florida beat LSU up and down the field that year for three and a half quarters
A game is 4 quarters
Posted on 8/19/09 at 2:29 am to Bum
quote:
A game is 4 quarters
Sure, when the refs aren't doing a little home cookin'. When the refs are giving the home team favorable spots, the game is as long as they need it to be to produce the desired result.
That's why LSU's 2007 title isn't legit.
Posted on 8/19/09 at 2:45 am to HarnessedInSlums
quote:
HarnessedInSlums
Go flame elsewhere... You are clearly disassociated from reality and your mother still dresses you funny.
Posted on 8/19/09 at 2:52 am to HarnessedInSlums
quote:
Florida beat LSU up and down the field that year for three and a half quarters. In the end, the refs gave LSU the victory by adding an extra yard to a 4th down, Jacob Hester carry that was stopped short.
Without the zebras in your back pockets that year, you lose to Florida and never even sniff the title game.
That's why both of your supposed titles this decade are kind of a joke.
Wow.
Even more "what if's" and "could'ves".
Simply loser talk--nothing more.
Posted on 8/19/09 at 3:58 am to HarnessedInSlums
HarnessedInSlums...
from this board. He has nothing of value or relevance to say. Everyone just ignore him from now. He is irrelevant.
from this board. He has nothing of value or relevance to say. Everyone just ignore him from now. He is irrelevant.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News