Started By
Message
locked post

The real reason LSU is on a slide.

Posted on 1/1/10 at 9:36 pm
Posted by Wicked Cajun
Houma
Member since Aug 2009
187 posts
Posted on 1/1/10 at 9:36 pm
18 out of the 39 recruits in 05 and 06 are not on the team any more. No leadership.
Posted by DocJerome
New Jersey
Member since Aug 2009
887 posts
Posted on 1/1/10 at 9:46 pm to
Wow. That's telling.
Posted by Luke4LSU
Member since Oct 2007
11986 posts
Posted on 1/1/10 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

That's telling.


of?
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
34323 posts
Posted on 1/1/10 at 10:18 pm to
To be fair, most of the players who have left the team were not leaders.

Also, Jean-Francois and Beckwith contributed and left due to graduation or early entry.

The only guy I can think of who was in a leadership role was Perrilloux.

To illustrate the point, here are the other players we lost:

2005
FB Steven Korte
OT Kyle Anderson
S Antonio Robinson

Really...who cares about those guys? Nobody.

2006
WR Jared Mitchell
WR Ricky Dixon
TE JD Lott
OT Phil Loadholt
OT Zhamal Thomas
OT Mark Snyder
OG Matt Allen
OG Steven Singleton
DT Charles Deas
OLB Derrick Odom
S Troy Giddens
CB Jason Teague

A couple of guys stand out here. Obviously, losing Loadholt hurt a little bit, but he'd be gone by now anyways. Losing Zhamal Thomas hurt a bit because he, of any of the olinemen in the class, showed a lot of promise. The other olinemen were so-so.

Losing Deas was a blessing in disguise. Derrick Odom still would not be starting over Cutrera and the Georgia boys. Troy Giddens would never start. Jason Teague probably wouldn't be starting over Eugene or Hawkins.

So really, when you look at the players we lost, it boils down to one or two guys we really miss, and the only really important player was Perrilloux.
Posted by hobo with a rolex
everywhere
Member since Sep 2006
3203 posts
Posted on 1/1/10 at 10:19 pm to
I am not in any way a Miles lover, but we beat fla, Penn st, and ole miss with a better Qb. I am completely sold on the fact that niether JJ or Lee are the answer. I hope Garrett is farther along than than anyone knows, and hopefully can work his way up. I don't see much different results in the future with our current qbs.
Posted by Tiger Rob
Shreveport, La.
Member since Nov 2004
1681 posts
Posted on 1/1/10 at 10:21 pm to
there are four lineman in that class. They might not have developed but we were horrible there this especially at guard so signing guys and not having them grow into being a player is a big thing.
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
34323 posts
Posted on 1/1/10 at 10:24 pm to
Loadholt - would have been gone anyways
Thomas - probably could be starting at guard
Snyder - scrub
Allen - scrub
Singleton - scrub

I mean there is a reason Allen and Singleton transferred. Snyder was not going to be better than Barksdale or Black.

We're talking about one guy here, Zhamal Thomas. Would he have started over Dworaczyk this year? Probably. But he's one guy.
Posted by hogeb
Foster City, CA
Member since Jan 2006
369 posts
Posted on 1/1/10 at 10:32 pm to
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong about these comments:

2006
WR Jared Mitchell - left early for baseball
WR Ricky Dixon - transferred for lack of playing time (and rightly so)
TE JD Lott - transferred for lack of playing time (and rightly so)
OT Phil Loadholt - never made it to campus due to grades
OT Zhamal Thomas - kicked off for behavior
OT Mark Snyder - career ending injury
OG Matt Allen - transfered due to lack of playing time (I do think we miss him)
OG Steven Singleton - transferred (I'm not sure why)
DT Charles Deas - never made it to campus due to grades
OLB Derrick Odom - kicked off for behavior
S Troy Giddens - kicked off for behavior
CB Jason Teague - never made it to campus due to grades

So, by my reckoning, the only player lost that could have helped is Matt Allen, and he's not starting for TAMU, so how much he could have helped is debatable.
This post was edited on 1/1/10 at 10:38 pm
Posted by DocJerome
New Jersey
Member since Aug 2009
887 posts
Posted on 1/1/10 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

of?


Lack of player development.
Lack of organizational goals for recruits.
Quality of recruit in those years.
None of the above.
In the end, it really doesn't matter?

This post was edited on 1/1/10 at 10:40 pm
Posted by Tiger Rob
Shreveport, La.
Member since Nov 2004
1681 posts
Posted on 1/1/10 at 10:41 pm to
The point is you cant sign four o-lineman in a class and get nothing from them.

Posted by DocJerome
New Jersey
Member since Aug 2009
887 posts
Posted on 1/1/10 at 10:47 pm to
I concur.
Posted by hogeb
Foster City, CA
Member since Jan 2006
369 posts
Posted on 1/1/10 at 10:53 pm to
That's especially true since we were thin on the OL already. It's also one reason we are thin on the DL this year since Hitt, Barksdale, Blackman, and Hagans have all been moved to OL to compensate (though Hagans is inconsequential it seems). I do think they've done a good job recruiting OL the last two years, and this depth will begin to show next year.
Posted by Wicked Cajun
Houma
Member since Aug 2009
187 posts
Posted on 1/1/10 at 11:03 pm to
The point I was trying to make is look how many scholarship were wasted in 05 and 06. You need leadership from your seniors and juniors and we have very few. I agree that only a handful would be contrubuting. But take T-bow off of Florida and your talking about a different team. Not saying anyone was his caliber. But maybe our coaching staff sucks at finding good talent.
Posted by lsufanva
sandston virginia
Member since Aug 2009
13123 posts
Posted on 1/1/10 at 11:03 pm to
Hobo, I'm kind of in the same thinking as you.I still believe Jefferson could be fantastic but I question if he'll ever mentally be ready.He needs coaching bad.I also hope Garrett is as good as people were saying in the spring.Jefferson would have had great #'s today without the drops but he made some really questionable throws.If one of the qb's steps up and plays to their talent we'll be right back in the NC picture.As bad as we played offensively this year,we could've beaten every team we played.
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
34323 posts
Posted on 1/1/10 at 11:11 pm to
I think the bottom line is that 2005 and 2006 simply were not very good classes.

2005 was Miles' first class, and he had to pick up the pieces from Saban's departure. I think he actually did well considering. We got several key contributors from that class including LaFell, Black, Alem, and Hawkins. Of course, Perrilloux was in that class and we all THOUGHT he would be a key pickup.

Parts of the 2006 class were good (HB, TE, LB) but other parts were not as good (WR, DB) while still other parts ending up being just terrible (OL, DL).
Posted by hogeb
Foster City, CA
Member since Jan 2006
369 posts
Posted on 1/1/10 at 11:18 pm to
Well what if we look at who is still on the team from 2006. Any leaders?

Maybe:

Richard Dickson
Perry Riley
Charles Scott
Kelvin Sheppard

Underachievers:

Jai Eugene
Al Woods

and a few good but not great players:

Pep Levingston
Keiland Williams
Danny McCray
Jacob Cutrera

Still waiting on Richard Murphy.

Not a very strong class as it turns out, but if there is one "leader" on this year's team, it would be Charles Scott, so it wasn't a disaster. The last two years have been more stable, so we should have some juniors who can step up next year. We'll see
Posted by Wicked Cajun
Houma
Member since Aug 2009
187 posts
Posted on 1/1/10 at 11:24 pm to
Thats what I am hoping for. Hopefully 2007/2008 = 2003/2004
Posted by peopleschamp
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
6576 posts
Posted on 1/2/10 at 12:33 am to
quote:

18 out of the 39 recruits in 05 and 06 are not on the team any more. No leadership.

I don't believe it is about a loss of leadership among the players, but with the head coach. While Miles is an OK coach, I don't think anyone would argue he is the caliber of a Saban or a Meyer as a leader. Unfortunately for Miles he has to play Saban every year. The leadership comes from the top and runs through the program. Coaches like Meyer and Saban are control freaks and they run their program to a point everyone knows who is in charge and who they have to answer to.

Posted by tiger187
Jackson, MS
Member since Jan 2009
368 posts
Posted on 1/2/10 at 12:46 am to
quote:

I am not in any way a Miles lover, but we beat fla, Penn st, and ole miss with a better Qb. I am completely sold on the fact that niether JJ or Lee are the answer. I hope Garrett is farther along than than anyone knows, and hopefully can work his way up. I don't see much different results in the future with our current qbs.


Chris Garrett is not the permanent answer. I saw him play in high school a few times. he was pretty good there, of course, but i did not see anything too special there. He will be so-so
Posted by LSUDad
Still on the move
Member since May 2004
60767 posts
Posted on 1/2/10 at 3:32 am to
In 2006 Texas signed 25 kids, 9 will not be on the sidelines for the NC game. So you know what that means?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram