re: Seastrunk question

I don't think anyone from an Arky perspective is saying Malzahn made DMAC and Jones. We all know what type of God-given ability they have. He was smart enough as an OC to put these guys on the field at the same time. If anyone thinks we would have won the west that year without the introduction of the wildcat is fooling themselves...


What lies are being told to LS?

quote:

---

As you can probably tell by now they view their own opinions as facts and any opinons or facts they don't agree with as lies. In their mind since the Auburn coaches aren't telling Seastrunk "Don't pay attention to all those great Auburn running backs in the past we didn't coach them" or "yeah The offenses at Arkansas and Tulsa looks impressive but that is irrelevant" they are telling lies. It doesn't really matter what you say to them, reading comprehension and logical reasoning aren't their strong suit.

---

Bottom line is that the AU coaches are doing a pretty good job selling the University to this point. Whether they get Lattimore or Seastrunk it helps to be in those battles that they weren't in the last few years.

quote:

---

So is the order LS, ML, MD

---

Order for what? Do you mean order by the prospects intrest in AU or who I think is better?

quote:

---

link?

---

What do you mean link? You want me to link you to your own posts in this thread? You have stated over and over again that Auburn's history of running backs and Malzhans resume as an OC are irrelevant in this discussion (which is of course about what Auburn has to offer running back recruits in case you forgot). It would follow then that you agree with Born to be a Tigers post above saying Auburns staff is telling seastrunk lies...since they are telling him the opposite of your claims.

quote:

---

You want me to link you to your own posts in this thread? You have stated over and over again that Auburn's history of running backs and Malzhans resume as an OC are irrelevant in this discussion (which is of course about what Auburn has to offer running back recruits in case you forgot). It would follow then that you agree with Born to be a Tigers post above saying Auburns staff is telling seastrunk lies...since they are telling him the opposite of your claims.

---

auburn fans are the ones on here bringing up the history of running backs at your school from 5,10,20 years ago to begin with, when nobody currently at the school had jack shite to do with their development, recruitment, etc. Unless its due to steroids in the water fountain I dont really think it has anything to do with Auburn itself and especially not Curtis Luper who's big selling point is what? producing 2 above average backs in the Big 12?

Are you saying that his selling point is not look at the great RBs that we've had here at Auburn/look at what Malzahn did with McFadden but instead is look at the success I had at Oklahoma State (which pales in comparison to Larry Porter's btw)?