- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: RMD- Vote on 107
Posted on 4/8/10 at 2:28 pm to PastySkankster
Posted on 4/8/10 at 2:28 pm to PastySkankster
Option one.
Posted on 4/8/10 at 2:36 pm to GulfCoastBiased
quote:
Option one.
That makes a majority.
Posted on 4/8/10 at 2:55 pm to jembeurt
quote:
Majority which way?
Supplemental Rounds.
Posted on 4/8/10 at 2:58 pm to PastySkankster
Sweet balls.
With the first selection.....
I take .......
Hurry up. I'm ready to make a selection
With the first selection.....
I take .......
Hurry up. I'm ready to make a selection
Posted on 4/8/10 at 3:04 pm to jembeurt
Suntiger selects Jeff Luc LB!!! Called it, not takesys backsys.
But seriously, I'm pretty sure Luc, Joyner and Easily will be the first to go. My guess is that Michael Palardy will be the last.
But seriously, I'm pretty sure Luc, Joyner and Easily will be the first to go. My guess is that Michael Palardy will be the last.
Posted on 4/8/10 at 3:19 pm to Suntiger
quote:
My guess is that Michael Palardy will be the last
Since the rest of the players are also in the supplemental draft, my guess brad wing might be drafted last.
Posted on 4/8/10 at 4:09 pm to jembeurt
When do we get to find out the order for the supplemental draft? 
Posted on 4/8/10 at 4:20 pm to OldIowaTiger
quote:
When do we get to find out the order for the supplemental draft?
I can draw it up now.
Should I reveal it after the regular draft is over or just unveil it?
Posted on 4/8/10 at 4:21 pm to OBUDan
quote:
Should I reveal it after the regular draft is over or just unveil it?
Bring it! That way the crying can begin.
Posted on 4/8/10 at 5:12 pm to PastySkankster
WITHOUT FURTHER ADIEU... I GIVE YOU... the SUPPLEMENTAL DRAFT ORDER:
1) Pasty
2) Goosed
3) TSB4L
4) TIGER PHANATICK
5) OldIowaTiger
6) mgdtiger
7) OUandLSUFan
8) Harry3740
9) BayouCatFan
10) OBUDan
11) Crowbar
12) Flask
13) GeauxCroTigers
14) jc77
15) jembeurt
16) Hand
17) Yetty
18) 102362
19) Dro
20) GulfCoastBiased
21) SunTiger
22) Lynxcat
1) Pasty
2) Goosed
3) TSB4L
4) TIGER PHANATICK
5) OldIowaTiger
6) mgdtiger
7) OUandLSUFan
8) Harry3740
9) BayouCatFan
10) OBUDan
11) Crowbar
12) Flask
13) GeauxCroTigers
14) jc77
15) jembeurt
16) Hand
17) Yetty
18) 102362
19) Dro
20) GulfCoastBiased
21) SunTiger
22) Lynxcat
Posted on 4/8/10 at 5:42 pm to OBUDan
That's BS!!!! I have to pick behind Dan again!!! I'm done with this thing. 
Posted on 4/8/10 at 5:43 pm to crowbar832001
I found a random sequence generator online. Assigned everyone a number and those are the results it turned out.
So you can't even blame me for peaking at names in the hat
Posted on 4/8/10 at 5:45 pm to crowbar832001
I like it.
I just realized how nerdy I'll be over the next four years, being sure to check the stats of all of my players each week as they play random games around the country.
I just realized how nerdy I'll be over the next four years, being sure to check the stats of all of my players each week as they play random games around the country.
Posted on 4/8/10 at 5:46 pm to OBUDan
Oh well, I guess Suntiger is not getting Luc now.
I actually love my postion. Hopefully my guy makes it to me, and the other guy makes it back.
I actually love my postion. Hopefully my guy makes it to me, and the other guy makes it back.
Posted on 4/8/10 at 5:49 pm to jembeurt
How many players are available in the supplemental round?
Posted on 4/8/10 at 5:52 pm to OBUDan
quote:
WITHOUT FURTHER ADIEU... I GIVE YOU... the SUPPLEMENTAL DRAFT ORDER:
1) Pasty
I don't think I can take the pressure of picking 1st. I need to trade down! (J/K)
On a serious note:
Are we really going to just add two more roster spots with these 2 picks? If so, it makes it easy for me and not very interesting. However, if you really have to consider giving a player back to get a player, that changes things in a big way for me (a few others voiced that along with their vote). I like my guys, and giving some of them up for a higher rated player just won't happen (regardless of who is available). People will make very different decisions if this is the rule. You might be surprised at how far some of the first round guys fall if we do it that way. I would also recommend returning "traded" players back to the pool if we would go that route.
Your call Dan. No vote necessary IMO. Not trying to complicate things.
Posted on 4/8/10 at 6:01 pm to PastySkankster
I personally like the thought of giving one back. Will have to put more thought into it that way because you have to really give something up. You can't just stack yourself up at a position.
Posted on 4/8/10 at 6:02 pm to OldIowaTiger
It will certainly be different than the highest rated players leaving the board in order. It will keep people guessing and make the decisions difficult IMO. I know it changes my pick without a doubt.
Posted on 4/8/10 at 6:08 pm to PastySkankster
quote:
Are we really going to just add two more roster spots with these 2 picks? If so, it makes it easy for me and not very interesting. However, if you really have to consider giving a player back to get a player, that changes things in a big way for me (a few others voiced that along with their vote). I like my guys, and giving some of them up for a higher rated player just won't happen (regardless of who is available). People will make very different decisions if this is the rule. You might be surprised at how far some of the first round guys fall if we do it that way. I would also recommend returning "traded" players back to the pool if we would go that route.
Your call Dan. No vote necessary IMO. Not trying to complicate things.
I would love to do it where you throw players back, but a lot of posters expressed frustration on that.
If enough people want to do it that way, I'm cool with it. I like majority rule.
Popular
Back to top


1



