re: NCAA doesn't care about education anymore

Never did

quote:

---

Correct

In what other business can companies, in this case universities, band together to control labor expenses for the rank in file anc stuffed outside in one; while administrators keep making bigger and bigger salaries.

Not in the US.

---

Kavabaw put it best: they want to justify not paying their employees on the grounds that their business model is to not pay their employees.

Ole Eltigre52 wants LSU to be a top academic institution. That’s why he’s here on the recruiting board throwing shade.

[quote]NCAA has little to do with NIL since the Supreme Court ruled their regulations on NIL were illegal

[/quote]

Counselor,

this is the farthest thing from the truth, the USSC affirmed the lower courts finding that NCAA By-Laws violated provisions of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act in prohibiting education related compensation to student-athletes.

NIL was a creation of the NCAA.

The following is directly quoted from the Harvard Law Review analysis of the case NCAA v Alston in the very first paragraph:

"in NCAA v. Alston,
5. 141 S. Ct. 2141 (2021).
the Supreme Court upheld a district court ruling that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules limiting education-related compensation violated section 1 of the Sherman Act.
6. See id. at 2151–52, 2166.
Shortly after the Court’s decision, the NCAA voted of its own accord to allow a student athlete to receive compensation in exchange for use of their name, image, and likeness (NIL).
7. The Alston holding did not compel the NCAA’s NIL decision because the ruling left the NCAA’s rules limiting compensation unrelated to education undisturbed. See id. at 2165.
Even after this series of changes, the NCAA still restricts the compensation that schools can provide directly to their athletes unrelated to education."

Additionally, for your reading pleasure:

HLR NCAA v Alston

National Law Review article on NCAA v Alston