Started By
Message

re: Lache and Reed

Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:17 pm to
Posted by MightyYat
StB Garden District
Member since Jan 2009
25029 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

texas isn't showing any interest, and momma might be on LSU's side...



They're from here. His mom wants him at LSU. Therefore, mama's right. I meant to say this state as in this is as far as he goes. Poorly worded I guess.
Posted by seeLSUrun
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2005
23038 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:18 pm to
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
33152 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

epic meltdown.


The only people you will see that from will be the ones who don't really keep up with it year round and come here in February just to see who LSU signs. They will come and demand to know how Les can loose one of our state's top recruits again.
I would love to get them both but feel Reed is a goner and have a lot of doubt about Lache coming too.
Don't be disappointed not to see gnashing of teeth here in February though. Not from everyone anyway.
This post was edited on 10/27/09 at 4:22 pm
Posted by Brendoni
Oklahoma City, Ok
Member since Apr 2009
22198 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

They're from here. His mom wants him at LSU. Therefore, mama's right. I meant to say this state as in this is as far as he goes. Poorly worded I guess.


probably my reading. i'm all doped up on cold medicine
Posted by Monk
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
3660 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:35 pm to
I find it very disturbing to learn that Reed and Seastrunk are now, according to highly reliable AU fans, recruiting for AU.

I would have thought that those 2 guys would have much more influence with players rated higher than 2-3 stars.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
294984 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:38 pm to
In the end, Lache to LSU or U$C. Always felt $C was a bigger player than he has let on.


Neither of these players are must haves for LSU. Reed more than Seastrunk only because of the in state connotations.
Posted by warAUeagle
Member since Oct 2009
192 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

players rated higher than 2-3 stars

Like Antonio Goodwin, Joel Bonomolo, LaDarius Owens, Jeremy Richardson, Ed Christian, Shon Coleman, Craig Sanders?
Posted by bhelmLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2009
637 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:40 pm to
Most know not to put much stock into Auburn boards or pay sites. Auburn fans were just saying a few weeks ago that it was an AU/TEXAS battle for Lache.

What do you know, he is quoted as saying he doesn't think he has received a single letter for UT this season.
Posted by DEANintheYAY
LEFT COAST
Member since Jan 2008
31975 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:40 pm to
quote:



Neither of these players are must haves for LSU. Reed more than Seastrunk only because of the in state connotations.


You got it backwards. LACHE is a NEED, Reed can be substituted for by Fobbs or others.
Posted by bhelmLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2009
637 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:41 pm to
I thought Shon Coleman was going to Bama?
Posted by warAUeagle
Member since Oct 2009
192 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:43 pm to
Shon Coleman is verbally committed to Auburn bud.
Posted by bhelmLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2009
637 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:44 pm to
For now....
Posted by warAUeagle
Member since Oct 2009
192 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:46 pm to
Haha ooooOOOoooooo Uh oh! I'm worried
Posted by bhelmLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2009
637 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:47 pm to
Don't get too worried, Bama might decide they don't want him anymore.
Posted by warAUeagle
Member since Oct 2009
192 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

Don't get too worried, Bama might decide they don't want him anymore.

HAHA! Didn't you know that's what happens with all of our commits?!
Posted by lsuchamps11
Member since Oct 2009
257 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:50 pm to
Lache is more valuable to us than Reed. but a need is going too far, did you RS at tailback. Lache's job at LSU is 10-15 carries per game. if he goes elsewhere RS gets 8-10 carries and the rest goes to other backs. he's not critical. but he's really good and we want him badly enough to pass on Christine Michaels (5 star)
Posted by STLSU
Hallandale Beach, FL
Member since Dec 2004
14823 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:51 pm to
AU is worried about losing Shon Coleman.
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
87025 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

bhelmLSU


I watched Shon Colman and Damien Robinson(sp) play against South Panola and they got pushed around by smaller faster DE and DT... I know SP is known as a powerhouse, but we are talking about D-1 talent here getting put on their backs. I wasn't impressed at all. However it is a rivalry and everyone was expecting Olive Branch to win, so who knows.

I have seen video of Robinson and Colman and they did look much more sound than what I witnessed first hand.

This post was edited on 10/27/09 at 4:56 pm
Posted by STLSU
Hallandale Beach, FL
Member since Dec 2004
14823 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:56 pm to
Robinson isn't highly regarded, and I'm glad we seem to be passing on him.

Bhelm knows his stuff and posts on Tiger Forums.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
294984 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

quote:


You got it backwards. LACHE is a NEED, Reed can be substituted for by Fobbs or others.





Lache would be a situational player at LSU. Can't see him getting 10 touches a game for LSU in the present system.

Hate to say it, but Lache would most likely be highlighted elsewhere. Don't see it happening at LSU, at the RB position.
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram