- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lache and Reed
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:17 pm to Brendoni
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:17 pm to Brendoni
quote:
texas isn't showing any interest, and momma might be on LSU's side...
They're from here. His mom wants him at LSU. Therefore, mama's right. I meant to say this state as in this is as far as he goes. Poorly worded I guess.
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:19 pm to AuburnCPA
quote:
epic meltdown.
The only people you will see that from will be the ones who don't really keep up with it year round and come here in February just to see who LSU signs. They will come and demand to know how Les can loose one of our state's top recruits again.
I would love to get them both but feel Reed is a goner and have a lot of doubt about Lache coming too.
Don't be disappointed not to see gnashing of teeth here in February though. Not from everyone anyway.
This post was edited on 10/27/09 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:19 pm to MightyYat
quote:
They're from here. His mom wants him at LSU. Therefore, mama's right. I meant to say this state as in this is as far as he goes. Poorly worded I guess.
probably my reading. i'm all doped up on cold medicine
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:35 pm to chinese58
I find it very disturbing to learn that Reed and Seastrunk are now, according to highly reliable AU fans, recruiting for AU.
I would have thought that those 2 guys would have much more influence with players rated higher than 2-3 stars.
I would have thought that those 2 guys would have much more influence with players rated higher than 2-3 stars.
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:38 pm to Monk
In the end, Lache to LSU or U$C. Always felt $C was a bigger player than he has let on.
Neither of these players are must haves for LSU. Reed more than Seastrunk only because of the in state connotations.
Neither of these players are must haves for LSU. Reed more than Seastrunk only because of the in state connotations.
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:38 pm to Monk
quote:
players rated higher than 2-3 stars
Like Antonio Goodwin, Joel Bonomolo, LaDarius Owens, Jeremy Richardson, Ed Christian, Shon Coleman, Craig Sanders?
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:40 pm to Monk
Most know not to put much stock into Auburn boards or pay sites. Auburn fans were just saying a few weeks ago that it was an AU/TEXAS battle for Lache.
What do you know, he is quoted as saying he doesn't think he has received a single letter for UT this season.
What do you know, he is quoted as saying he doesn't think he has received a single letter for UT this season.
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:40 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Neither of these players are must haves for LSU. Reed more than Seastrunk only because of the in state connotations.
You got it backwards. LACHE is a NEED, Reed can be substituted for by Fobbs or others.
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:41 pm to DEANintheYAY
I thought Shon Coleman was going to Bama?
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:43 pm to bhelmLSU
Shon Coleman is verbally committed to Auburn bud.
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:46 pm to bhelmLSU
Haha ooooOOOoooooo Uh oh! I'm worried

Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:47 pm to warAUeagle
Don't get too worried, Bama might decide they don't want him anymore. 
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:49 pm to bhelmLSU
quote:
Don't get too worried, Bama might decide they don't want him anymore.
HAHA! Didn't you know that's what happens with all of our commits?!
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:50 pm to DEANintheYAY
Lache is more valuable to us than Reed. but a need is going too far, did you RS at tailback. Lache's job at LSU is 10-15 carries per game. if he goes elsewhere RS gets 8-10 carries and the rest goes to other backs. he's not critical. but he's really good and we want him badly enough to pass on Christine Michaels (5 star)
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:51 pm to bhelmLSU
AU is worried about losing Shon Coleman.
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:54 pm to bhelmLSU
quote:
bhelmLSU
I watched Shon Colman and Damien Robinson(sp) play against South Panola and they got pushed around by smaller faster DE and DT... I know SP is known as a powerhouse, but we are talking about D-1 talent here getting put on their backs. I wasn't impressed at all. However it is a rivalry and everyone was expecting Olive Branch to win, so who knows.
I have seen video of Robinson and Colman and they did look much more sound than what I witnessed first hand.
This post was edited on 10/27/09 at 4:56 pm
Posted on 10/27/09 at 4:56 pm to memphisplaya
Robinson isn't highly regarded, and I'm glad we seem to be passing on him.
Bhelm knows his stuff and posts on Tiger Forums.
Bhelm knows his stuff and posts on Tiger Forums.
Posted on 10/27/09 at 5:04 pm to STLSU
quote:quote:
You got it backwards. LACHE is a NEED, Reed can be substituted for by Fobbs or others.
Lache would be a situational player at LSU. Can't see him getting 10 touches a game for LSU in the present system.
Hate to say it, but Lache would most likely be highlighted elsewhere. Don't see it happening at LSU, at the RB position.
Popular
Back to top


2




