- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Get QB Riley Ferguson now ....
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:04 pm to Tiger Authority
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:04 pm to Tiger Authority
Not a hijack at all...it relates to Ferguson. I don't think LSU is pursuing Ferguson to the level LSU is pursuing Johnson (the new reference).
Therefore, I don't think we are going hard after Ferguson and I don't think he will be part of this class.
Therefore, I don't think we are going hard after Ferguson and I don't think he will be part of this class.
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:14 pm to GABlueDog
Boy yall some stupid gay,dum,jobless,lazy,always the same posters bitching about nothing...tatoo?really
jj2.0?
some of yall posters need tooo die off quickly,,,
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:17 pm to NEKCIHCUSL
JJ had no tats yet he curb stomped someone and pouted for 4 years, so that logic is retarded.
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:23 pm to sunnydaze
This whole thread went to shite.
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:24 pm to Bearded Angler
quote:
who are you to judge a man based on his tattoos?
Im a person with 2 eyes, a brain, and that's honest. Everybody is judged whether you want to accept it or not. This is not a job application for Burger King. This is a 4 year commitment to lead a multi million dollar football program. LSU isn't taking 4 qbs, it's like a marriage. I guess you wouldn't care if your wife looked like trailer trash either
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:24 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
This whole thread went to shite.
As are all QB threads that are started on this board
Simple solution: make referring to JJ or Lee, or comparing a current recruit to them, a bannable offense
This post was edited on 5/16/12 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:27 pm to glenoaks
You dont even know the kid. Don't judge a book by the cover my man. While I do agree with you about how tattoos can be looked down upon, that is very shallow of you to just say "oh he has tattoos, I dont want him to lead my team"
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:29 pm to glenoaks
What the hell happened to my Riley thread ?
The kid is a winner, forget the ink on his arm.
The main thing is that he has an "Arm" and he will get the ball downfield and to the right guy.
The kid is a winner, forget the ink on his arm.
The main thing is that he has an "Arm" and he will get the ball downfield and to the right guy.
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:30 pm to GeauxAggie972
quote:
Simple solution: make referring to JJ or Lee, or comparing a current recruit to them, a bannable offense
I wish it was that easy. ha
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:38 pm to bopper50
Long story short...I like Ferguson, as do a lot of other people here as well as a lot of other programs. He is good. But I do not think he will be a part of this class...partly because the coaches like someone else more.
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:52 pm to GABlueDog
I like Ferguson's tools. His tools are comparable to most of the top 10 qbs in the class. He quite honestly has better tools than Mitch does. The tattoo issue is bogus. Has nothing to do with his judgement nor his makeup as a person.
Not sure how hard we're recruiting him but we're in his top 3 so we must be recruiting him some. Also Clemson isn't in his top 3(at least weren't last week) and to my knowledge Clemson isn't planning to take a qb this year. They got Kelly last year and already have a 2014 kid. Ferguson was/is Bama's to lose but now that Bateman is in for them he may have to pursue other options. UNC is the team to watch with Ferguson. Who knows for sure how it breaks down. Each qb commitment changes the dynamic for kids.
Not sure how hard we're recruiting him but we're in his top 3 so we must be recruiting him some. Also Clemson isn't in his top 3(at least weren't last week) and to my knowledge Clemson isn't planning to take a qb this year. They got Kelly last year and already have a 2014 kid. Ferguson was/is Bama's to lose but now that Bateman is in for them he may have to pursue other options. UNC is the team to watch with Ferguson. Who knows for sure how it breaks down. Each qb commitment changes the dynamic for kids.
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:58 pm to lsufanva
quote:
Not sure how hard we're recruiting him but we're in his top 3
when was this announced?
Posted on 5/16/12 at 3:06 pm to lsufanva
quote:
He quite honestly has better tools than Mitch does.
Agree.
Posted on 5/16/12 at 3:24 pm to GABlueDog
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree as well, this kid has all the tools to be a great QB at LSU and we should pour it on to get him.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:
He quite honestly has better tools than Mitch does.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree.
I agree as well, this kid has all the tools to be a great QB at LSU and we should pour it on to get him.
This post was edited on 5/16/12 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 5/16/12 at 3:44 pm to glenoaks
quote:
Everybody is judged whether you want to accept it or not
That doesn't mean those judgements are valid.
Just because you don't like Tattoos (I hate them, especially on women) doesn't mean its a "bad decsion" let alone an indicator that someone will make bad decisions as a QB.
Posted on 5/16/12 at 5:22 pm to H-Town Tiger
Ask what 3 schools he was considering the most in a 247 article(or one of the team sites on there) last week and named Bama,LSU and USCe(I'm pretty sure;I'll have to check to be positive). I would consider that as much a top 3 as anything a kid says these days since it changes so much.
Posted on 5/16/12 at 8:40 pm to GABlueDog
quote:
I can't use JJ because every one will think of JJ
JJ has another 4 years of eligibility? If everyone on the recruiting board thinks we are recruiting JJ over again, we need a new batch of recruitniks.
Popular
Back to top

1





